Free gingival graft for the increase of peri-implant attached keratinized mucosa decreased after guided bone regeneration

골 유도 재생술 후 감소된 임플란트 주위 부착 각화 점막 증대를 위한 유리 치은 이식술 증례

  • Kim, Deug-Han (Department of Periodontology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Ji, Suk (Department of Periodontology, Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Pang, Eun-Kyoung (Department of Periodontology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김득한 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 지숙 (고려대학교 안암병원 치과 치주과) ;
  • 방은경 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: During guided bone regeneration procedures for the augmentation of deficient alveolar ridge, primary closure of flap is necessary. For primary flap closure, flap is repositioned coronally and the zone of attached keratinized mucosa may decreased. The need for attached keratinized mucosa around dental implants is still controversial, but sufficient peri-implant attached keratinized mucosa would be beneficial for functional and esthetic aspects. This case report presents three cases that demonstrated free gingival graft for increasing the zone of peri-implant attached keratinized mucosa which was decreased after guided bone regeneration. Materials and Methods: In first case, maxillary incisors were extracted and guided bone regeneration was performed simultaneously. Because the membrane was exposed at 3 weeks after operation, the membrane was removed and free gingival graft was performed for primary flap closure. Free gingival graft was performed again at implant placement for the increase of attached keratinized mucosa. In second case, guided bone regeneration was performed on lower right first molar area, and implant was placed with free gingival graft. In third case, lower right molar area showed insufficient attached keratinized mucosa after implant placement with guided bone regeneration. When abutments were connected, free gingival graft with apically positioned flap was performed. Result: In these three cases, the zone of attached keratinized mucosa around dental implants was decreased after guided bone regeneration. And the increase of peri-implant attached keratinized mucosa could be obtained effectively by free gingival graft. Conclusion: Free gingival graft could be a effective treatment method increasing the zone of attached keratinized mucosa which was decreased after guided bone regeneration procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosenquist B: A comparison of various methods of soft tissue management following the immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:43-51
  2. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC: Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol 1982;53:349-352 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1982.53.6.349
  3. Kennedy J, Bird W, Palcanis K et al: A longitudinal evaluation of varying widths of attached gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 198;:12:667-675 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1985.tb00938.x
  4. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI: A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  5. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR: The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  6. Carl E. Misch: CONTEMPORARY IMPLANT DENTISTRY 3rd edition. MOSBY ELSEVIER 2008
  7. Fugazzotto PA: Maintenance of soft tissue closure following guided bone regeneration: technical considerations and report of 723 cases. J Periodontol 1999;70:1085-1097 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1085
  8. Trombelli L, Tatakis DN, Scabbia A, Zimmerman GJ: Comparison of mucogingival changes following treatment with coronally positioned flap and guided tissue regeneration procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;5:448-455
  9. Silverstein LH, Lefkove MD, Garnick JJ: The use of free gingival soft tissue to improve the implant/soft-tissue interface. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:36-40
  10. Evian CI, al-Maseeh J, Symeonides E: Soft tissue augmentation for implant dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:195-198, 200-202, 204-206
  11. Bauman GR, Rapley JW, Hallmon WW, Mills M: The peri-implant sulcus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:273-280
  12. Meffer R: The soft tissue interface in dental implantology. Implantologist 1986;5:55-58
  13. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F: The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(81)80007-0
  14. Giancarlo Agudio, Michele Nieri, Roberto Rotundo, Pierpaolo Cortellini, Giovanpaolo Pini Prato: Free Gingival Grafts to Increase Keratinized Tissue: A Retrospective Long-Term Evaluation (10 to 25 years) of Outcomes. J Periodontol 2008;79:587-594 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070414