DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PRESENT STATUS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMY OLYMPIAD AND FACTOR ANALYSIS OF SCIENCE STUDY ON ITS PAST PROBLEMS

국제천문올림피아드 현황과 기출문항에 대한 과학탐구 유형 분석

  • Yim, In-Sung (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Sung, Hyun-Il (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Dong (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Kim, Bong-Gyu (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) ;
  • Kim, Yoo-Jea (Korea Astronomy Olympiad) ;
  • Kang, Yong-Hee (Department of Earth Science Education, Teachers College, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Choe, Seung-Urn (Department of Science Education, College of Education, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

The International Astronomy Olympiad (IAO) was established by the Euro-Asian Astronomical Society in order to disseminate astronomical knowledge, promote international cooperation in astronomical education area and recognize the importance of astronomy in far-reaching field of science and human culture. The first IAO competition was held at the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences located in the north Caucasus of Russia in 1996. Since then, it has been held every year. This paper describes the present status of the IAO main regulations regarding its operation and major results by year, related institutions, and organizations. We created a scientific inquiry framework to analyze past IAO problems in the recognitive aspect in order to measure levels of the scientific knowledges and the scientific thinking abilities. Through this analysis, we can understand the current status of the IAO, and examine the future direction of Korea Astronomy Olympiad. Also, we can make preparation for the IAO competition and the education of delegates.

Keywords

References

  1. 박용선, 임인성, 2001, 2001 국제천문올림피아드 참관기, 천문학회보 특별기고, 27, 91
  2. 최승언, 임인성, 2003, 2002년 제7회 국제천문올림피아 드 참가기, 천문학회보 28, 24
  3. 임인성, 최승언, 2004, 국제천문올림피아드 문제에 나타 난 인지적 측면의 과학탐구 요소 분석, 한국지구과학회지, 25, 719
  4. 최승언, 2005, 서울대학교 과학영재교육프로그램 평가를 위한 평가틀 개발 및 평가 수행, 서울대학교 연구보고서, 63
  5. Azar, A., 2005, Analysis of turkish highschool physics-examination question and university entrance Exams questions according to Blooms' Taxonomy, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2, 68
  6. Bloom, B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 56
  7. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A., 2002, Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in School: A theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks, Science Education, 86, 175 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
  8. De Vito, A., 1989, Creative wellsprings for science teaching. (2nd Ed.). West Lafayette: Creative Ventures, Inc., 89
  9. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls., S., 1996, Analysis of Nine High School Biology Laboratory Manuals: Promoting Scientific Inquiry, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. Karamustafaog, S., 2003, High-School Chemistry- Examination Questions according to Blooms Taxonomy, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4, 25 https://doi.org/10.1039/b2rp90034c
  11. Park, J. W., 2004, Suggesting a model of scientific creativity and developing scientific creativity activities, The 8th Asia-Pacific Conference on Giftedness, 104
  12. Sternberg, R. J., 1994, A triarchic model for teaching and assessing students in general Psychology, The General Psychologist, 30, 42