대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제46권1호
  • /
  • Pages.22-30
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

3종의 CAD/CAM 시스템에서 지르코니아 코어의 파절 강도에 관한 비교 연구

Comparative study in fracture strength of zirconia cores fabricated with three different CAD/CAM systems

  • 신언식 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 박원희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Shin, Eon-Sick (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 발행 : 2008.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 CAD/CAM 시스템을 이용하여 제작된 지르코니아 코어의 사용이 증가하고 있다. 하지만 국내 기술력을 이용한 제품에 대한 연구는 아직 미흡한 단계이다. 본 연구의 목적은 3종의 CAD/CAM 시스템에서 단일 전부 도재관을 위한 지르코니아 코어의 파절 강도를 비교하는 것이다. 본 연구를 위해 상악 중절치 부위의 전부도재관을 위한 30개의 지르코니아 코어를 제작하였다. 각 군은 다음과 같다. 1. $Adens^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM 시스템 군, 2. $Cerasys^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM 시스템 군, 3. $Lava^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM 시스템 군. 모든 시편은 두께 0.5mm, relief $40{\mu}m$로 일관성 있게 제작하였다. 시편은 Z250/SN5S을 이용하여 파절 강도를 측정하였다. 각 군의 평균과 표준편차를 구하고, 각 군간의 유의성을 알아보기 위해 Kruskal waillis test와 Wilcoxon Rank Sum test를 시행하였다. 본 연구 결과, 각 군의 파절 강도는 $Adens^{(R)}$ 시스템은 $615.89{\pm}156.1N$, $Cerasys^{(R)}$ 시스템은 $863.98{\pm}151.5N$, 3M $Lava^{(R)}$ 시스템은 $1143.1{\pm}286.6N$ 이었다. 각 군의 파절 강도는 3M $Lava^{(R)}$ 시스템, $Cerasys^{(R)}$ 시스템, $Adens^{(R)}$ 시스템 순으로 통계학적으로 유의한 수준의 차이를 보였으나, 세 그룹 모두 임상적으로 사용 가능한 결과를 나타냈다. 실제 임상에서 장기간의 사용에 대한 연구가 필요할 것이다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare three different CAD/CAM systems through the fracture strength of zirconia core and to evaluate the clinical availability of each system. Material and methods: The following three groups of 30 maxillary mesial incisor core for all-ceramics(each group 10) were fabricated as follows: group 1. $Adens^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM system, group 2. $Cerasys^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM system, group 3. 3M $Lava^{(R)}$ CAD/CAM system. All specimens were manufactured consistently thickness 0.5mm and relief $40{\mu}m$. Specimens were subjected to compressive loading on the lingual area by Z250/$SN5S^{(R)}$. Each group's mean and standard deviation were calculated and Kruskal Waillis test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test were utilized to find out the relationship among the groups. Results: The results were as follows: 1. The mean fracture strength of $Adens^{(R)}$ system was $615.89{\pm}156.1N$, the $Cerasys^{(R)}$ system was $863.98{\pm}151.5N$, and the 3M $Lava^{(R)}$ system was $1143.1{\pm}286.6N$. 2. The fracture strength of the systems showed the significant statistical differences in order of 3M $Lava^{(R)}$ system, $Cerasys^{(R)}$ system, $Adens^{(R)}$ system. Conclusion: In this study, in spite of the differences among the groups, every group showed clinically useful results. It is necessary to study further clinical experiments on a long term basis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park JH, Whang JW, Shin SW. The Study of Flexural Strength of Various Zirconia Ceramics. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:142-153
  2. Rosenblum M. A review of All-Ceramic Restoration. JADA 1997;128:297-307 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0193
  3. Burke FJT. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded All-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293-300
  4. Yu JH, Kim YC, Kang DW. A Study on the Marginal Fidelities and Fracture Strength of IPS Empress $2^{\circledR}$ ceramic crowns. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:1-11
  5. Luca L, Dalloca UD. A new esthetic material for anterior crowns: IPS-Empress. QDT 1995:171-175
  6. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-456 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  7. Ardlin BI. Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crowns and bridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater 2002;18:590-595 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00095-1
  8. Guazzato M, Proos K, Sara G, Swain MV. Strength, reliability and mode of fracture of bilayered pocerain/core ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:142-149
  9. Jeon MH, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, Lim JS, Jeong HC. A study of precise fit of the CAM zirconia all-ceramic framework. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:611-621
  10. Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Herold V, Walter MH. Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:146-151
  11. McLaren EA, Terry DA. CAD/CAM systems, materials and clinical guidelines for all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Compendium 2002;23:637-653
  12. Giordano R. All-ceramic restorative systems: aluminabased core systems. J Mass Dent Soc 2002;51:30-35
  13. White SN, Caputo AA, Li ZC, Zhao XY. Modulus of rupture of the Procera All-Ceramic System. J Esthet Dent 1996; 8:120-126 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb01005.x
  14. Wagner WC, Chu TM. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:140-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90297-8
  15. Hwang JW, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A Study on Fracture Strength of Conventional and Copy-milled In-CERAM Crowns. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:1-27
  16. Kim DY, Lee YS, Park WH. Comparative Study of Fracture Strength Depending on the Thickness of some All Ceramic Cores. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:49-56
  17. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Swain MV, Ironside J. Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-Ceram Zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:339-346
  18. Suttor D, Bunke K, Hoescheler S, Hauptmann H, Hertlein G. LAVA-the system for all-ceramic $ZrO_2$ crown and bridge frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 2001;4:195-206
  19. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. pp65, ST Louis, CV Mosby, 1989
  20. Shin DK, Kang HJ, Park YS, Park KS, Dong JK. Fracture Strength of the IPS Empress Crown : The Effects of Incisal Reduction and Axial Inclination on Upper Canine. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:30-40
  21. Campbell SD, Sozio RB. Evaluation of the fit and strength of an all-ceramic fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1998;59:301-306
  22. Nakamura T, Ohyama T, Imanashi A, Ishigaki S. Franture resistance of pressable glass-ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabilitation 2002;29:951-955 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00929.x
  23. Scherrer SS, Rijk WG. The effect of crown length on the fracture resistance of posterior pocelain and Glass-ceramic crown. Int J Prosthet 1992;5:550-557
  24. Grossman DG, Nelson JW. The bonded Dicor crown. J Dent Res 1987;800. 66:206
  25. Probster L. Compressive strength of two modern All-ceramic crown. Int J Prosthet 1992;4:409-414
  26. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ. Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconiabased ceramics. J Dent 2000;28:529-535 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00030-0
  27. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Review zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  28. Willer J, Rossbach A, Weber HP. Computer-assisted milling of dental restoration using a new CAD/CAM data acquisition system. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:346-351 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70136-2
  29. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina- and zirconia-based three unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-238
  30. Bindl A, Mormann WH. An up to 5-years clinical evaluation of posterior In-Ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:451-456
  31. Koh JW, Yang JH, Lee SH. Influence of thickness of Empress 2 ceramic on fracture strength. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:446-460
  32. Friedlander LD, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength Dicor crowns. PartI. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:159-168
  33. Ludwing K. Study on the ultimate strength of all-ceramic crowns. Dental-labor. No.5/91:647-651
  34. Kem M, Fechtig T, Strub J. Influence of water storage and thermal cycling on the fracture strength of all-ceramic, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:251-256 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90463-4
  35. Scherrer SS, Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-467
  36. McCormick JT, Rowland W, Shilingburg Jr HT, Duncanson Jr MG. Effect of luting media on the compressive strengths of two types of all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 1993;24:405-408
  37. Hwang JW, Yang JH. A study on the fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled In-Ceram crown. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:417-429
  38. Seghi RR, Daher T. Relative flexural strength of dental restorative ceramics. Dental Materials 1990;6:181-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(90)90026-B
  39. Lee SK, Wilson PR. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns with varying core elastic moduli. Aust Dent J 2000;45:103-107
  40. Derand P, Derand T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:131-135
  41. Yang JH, Yeo IS, Lee SH, Han JS, Lee JB. Mrginal fit of celay/In-Ceram, Conventional In-Ceram and Empress 2 all-ceramic single crowns. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 2002;40:131-139
  42. Maruyama T, Koh N, Hino T, Miyauchi S. Clinical use of a new castable glass ceramic material. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:138-146
  43. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo:Analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-1258 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740060301