International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems

Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems (제어로봇시스템학회)
권호 표지

A Unified Approach to Exact, Approximate, Optimized and Decentralized Output Feedback Pole Assignment

  • Tarokh, Mahmoud (Department of Computer Science, San Diego State University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The paper proposes a new formulation of the output feedback pole assignment problem. In this formulation, a unified approach is presented for solving the pole assignment problem with various additional objectives. These objectives include optimizing a variety of performance indices, and imposing constraints on the output feedback matrix structure, e.g. decentralized structure. Conditions for the existence of the output feedback are discussed. However, the thrust of the paper is on the development of a convergent pole assignment algorithm. It is shown that when exact pole assignment is not possible, the method can be used to place the poles close to the desired locations. Examples are provided to illustrate the method.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Kimura, "Pole assignment by gain output feedback," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 509-516, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1975.1101028
  2. E. J. Davison and S. H. Wang, "On pole assignment in linear multivariable systems using output control," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 516-518, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1975.1101023
  3. T. Topalgu and D. Seborg, "A design procedure for pole assignment using output feedback," Int. J. Control, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 741-751, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177508922119
  4. H. Seraji, "A new method for pole placement using output feedback," Int. J. Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 147-156, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207177808922444
  5. P. Misra and R. Patel, "Numerical algorithms for eigenvalue assignment by constant and dynamic output feedback," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 34, pp. 579-588, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1109/9.24226
  6. M. Tarokh, "On output stabilization and pole assignment," Int. J. Control, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 399-408, 1980
  7. P. T. Kabamba and R. W. Longman, "Exact pole assignment using direct or dynamic output feedback," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1244-1246, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1982.1103105
  8. V. L. Syrmos, C. T. Abdallah, P. Dorato, and K. Grigoriadis, "Static output feedback - A survey," Automatica, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125-137, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(96)00141-0
  9. X. Wang, "Pole assignment by static output feedback," J. Math. Systems Estimation Control, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 23-24, 1993
  10. M. Tarokh, "An approach to pole assignment by centralized and decentralized output feedback," IEE Proceeding, Part D, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 89-97, 1989
  11. J. Leventides and N. Karcanias, "Global asymptotic linearization of pole assignment map: A closed-form solution for the constant output feedback problem," Automatica, vol. 31, pp. 1303-1309, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(95)00047-Z
  12. T. Hu and J. Lam "On optimizing performance indices with pole assignment constraints," Proc. Instn Mech Engr., vol. 212, Part I, pp. 327-337, 1998
  13. J. Ensor and R. Davis, "Assignment of reduced sensitivity eigenstructure," IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl., vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 104-109, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-cta:20000137
  14. I. Carotenuto and G. Franze, "Eigenvalue assignment with spectral condition number optimization by static output feedback," Proc. of the 11th Mediterranean Conf. Contr. Automation, 2003
  15. T. Hu, Z. Lin, and J. Lam, "A unified gradient approach to performance optimization under pole assignment constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 361-384, July, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000037409.86566.f9
  16. B. A. White, "Eigenstructure assignment: A survey," Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., vol. 209, pp. 1-11, 1995
  17. E. K. Chu, "Optimization and pole assignment in control system design," Int. J. Appl. Math Comput. Sci, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1035-1053, 2001
  18. E. W. E. Chu, "Approximate pole assignment," Int. J. Control, vol. 58, pp. 471-484, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179308923011
  19. C. C. Tsui, "Six-dimensional expansion of output feedback design for eigenstructure assignment," J. Franklin Inst., vol. 342, no. 7, pp. 892-901, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2005.06.004
  20. D. W. C. Ho, J. Lam, J. Xu, and H. K. Tam, "Neural computation for robust approximate pole assignment - A survey," Neurocomputing, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 191-211, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(99)00057-0
  21. J. Lam and H. K. Tam, "Robust feedback pole assignment using genetic algorithms," Proc. Inst. Mech. Engr., Part I. J. Sys, Contr. Eng., vol. 214, no. 5, pp. 327-338, 2000
  22. S. H. Wang and E. J. Davison, "On stabilization of decentralized control systems," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 18, pp. 473-479, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1973.1100362
  23. X. Wang, "Decentralized pole assignment and product Grassmanians," SIAM J. Control Optimization, vol. 32, pp. 855-875, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1137/S0363012991223339
  24. J. Leventides and N. Karcanias, "Decentralized dynamic pole assignment with low order compensators," IMA J. Math. Contr. Information, vol. 24, pp. 395-410, 2007
  25. M. Tarokh, "Measures for controllability, observability and fixed modes," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1268-1273, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1109/9.151124
  26. A. Dickman, "On the robustness of multivariable linear feedback systems in state-space representation," IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 32, pp. 407-410, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1987.1104611
  27. M. Tarokh, "Fixed modes in multivariable systems using constrained controllers," Automatica, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 495-497, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(85)90087-1