DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Posterior Cervical Fixation with Nitinol Shape Memory Loop in the Anterior-Posterior Combined Approach for the Patients with Three Column Injury of the Cervical Spine: Preliminary Report

  • Yu, Dong-Kun (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Heo, Dong-Hwa (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Min (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Hun (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Sheen, Seung-Hun (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Jun (Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University)
  • 발행 : 2008.11.28

초록

Objective: The authors reviewed clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with three column injury of the cervical spine who had undergone posterior cervical fixation using Nitinol shape memory alloy loop in the anterior-posterior combined approach. Materials: Nine patients were surgically treated with anterior cervical fusion using an iliac bone graft and dynamic plate-screw system, and the posterior cervical fixation using Nitinol shape memory loop ($Davydov^{TM}$) at the same time. A retrospective review was performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Frankel grading method. We reviewed the radiological parameters such as bony fusion rate, height of iliac bone graft strut, graft subsidence, cervical lordotic angle, and instrument related complication. Results: Single-level fusion was performed in five patients, and two-level fusion in four. Solid bone fusion was presented in all cases after surgery. The mean height of graft strut was significantly decreased from $20.46{\pm}9.97mm$ at immediate postoperative state to $18.87{\pm}8.60mm$ at the final follow-up period (p<0.05). The mean cervical lordotic angle decreased from $13.83{\pm}11.84^{\circ}$ to $11.37{\pm}6.03^{\circ}$ at the immediate postoperative state but then, increased to $24.39{\pm}9.83^{\circ}$ at the final follow-up period (p<0.05). There were no instrument related complications. Conclusion: We suggest that the posterior cervical fixation using Nitinol shape memory alloy loop may be a simple and useful method, and be one of treatment options in anterior-posterior combined approach for the patients with the three column injury of the cervical spine.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Berquist TH : Imaging of the postoperative spine. Radiol Clin North Am 44 : 407-418, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2006.01.002
  2. Braun JT, Akyuz E, Udall H, Ogilvie JW, Brodke DS, Bachus KN : Three-dimensional analysis of 2 fusionless scoliosis treatments : a flexible ligament tether versus a rigid-shape memory alloy staple. Spine 31 : 262-268, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197569.13266.fe
  3. Brodke DS, Klimo P, Bachus KN, Braun JT, Dailey AT : Anterior cervical fixation : analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 1566-1573, 2006 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00305
  4. Fagerström T, Hedlund R, Bancel P, Robert R, Dupas B : Laminar hook instrumentation in the cervical spine. An experimental study on the relation of hooks to the spinal cord. Eur Spine J 10 : 340- 344, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100251
  5. Harrington JF Jr, Park MC : Single level arthrodesis as treatment for midcervical fracture subluxation : a cohort study. J Spinal Disord Tech 20 : 42-48, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211255.05626.b0
  6. Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Putzier M, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, et al : Posterior stabilization of subaxial cervical spine trauma : indications and techniques. Injury 36 (Suppl 2) : B36-43, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.013
  7. Kim YS, Zhang HY, Moon BJ, Park KW, Ji KY, Lee WC, et al : Nitinol spring rod dynamic stabilization system and Nitinol memory loops in surgical treatment for lumbar disc disorders : shortterm follow up. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E10, 2007
  8. Kwon BK, Vaccaro AR, Grauer JN, Beiner JM : The use of rigid internal fixation in the surgical management of cervical spondylosis. Neurosurgery 60 : S118-129, 2007
  9. Lee DC, Yoon SH, Park HC, Park JO, Hyun DK, Park HS : Clinical and computed tomography evaluation of plate and screw on the cervical lateral mass : a modified magerl's technique. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 39 : 251-255, 2006
  10. Lee GY, Massicotte EM, Rampersaud YR : Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement : a comparison of the "open" lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech 20 : 25-32, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000211239.21835.ad
  11. Lindsey RW, Miclau T : Posterior lateral mass plate fixation of the cervical spine. J South Orthop Assoc 9 : 36-42; discussion 42, 2000
  12. Liu JK, Das K : Posterior fusion of the subaxial cervical spine : indications and techniques. Neurosurg Focus 10, 2001
  13. Sanders JO, Sanders AE, More R, Ashman RB : A preliminary investigation of shape memory alloys in the surgical correction of scoliosis. Spine 18 : 1640-1646, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199309000-00012
  14. Schultz KD, McLaughlin MR, Haid RW, Comey CH, Rodts GE, Alexander J : Single-stage anterior-posterior decompression and stabilization for complex cervical spine disorders. J Neurosurg 93 : 214-221, 2000 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0214
  15. Tankson C, Chutkan NB : Posterior cervical instrumentation. Orthopedics 29 : 695-700; quiz 701-702, 2006
  16. Toohey JS, Stromberg L, Neidre A, Ramsey M, Fogel GR : Treatment of cervical pseudarthrosis after Smith-Robinson procedure with Halifax clamp fixation. J Surg Orthop Adv 15 : 201-202, 2006

피인용 문헌

  1. Posterior Cervical Fixation with a Nitinol Shape Memory Loop for Primary Surgical Stabilization of Atlantoaxial Instability : A Preliminary Report vol.52, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.52.1.21
  2. Radicular Pain due to Subsidence of the Nitinol Shape Memory Loop for Stabilization after Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy vol.57, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.1.61
  3. Nitinol Memory Rods Versus Titanium Rods: A Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation in a Synthetic Corpectomy Model vol.11, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220902401