DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Natural Language Queries for Music Information Retrieval

음악정보 검색에서 이용자 자연어 질의의 정확성 연구

  • Lee, Jin-Ha (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

Our limited understanding of real-life music information queries is an impediment to developing music information retrieval (MIR) systems that meet the needs of real users. This study aims to contribute to developing a theorized understanding of how people seek music information by an empirical investigation of real-life queries, in particular, focusing on the accuracy of user-provided information and users' uncertainty expressions. This study found that much of users' information is inaccurate; users made various syntactic and semantic errors in providing this information. Despite these inaccuracies and uncertainties, many queries were successful in eliciting correct answers. A theory from pragmatics is suggested as a partial explanation for the unexpected success of inaccurate queries.

실제 이용자들의 필요성을 충족하는 음악정보 검색 시스템을 개발하는데 있어서 실생활의 음악 정보질의에 대한 부족한 이해가 장애가 되고 있다. 이 연구는 실생활 질의의 경험적 분석을 통해 이용자들이 어떻게 음악 정보를 찾는지에 대한 이론적인 이해를 돕고자 한다. 그 중에서도 미래의 음악정보 검색 시스템의 디자인, 특히 잠재적인 접근점을 선택하는데 있어서 결정적인 정보를 제공하는 역할을 하게 될 실생활의 음악정보 질의 내에서 이용자들이 제공한 정보의 정확성을 검토하고 있다. 이 연구는 이용자의 정보 중 상당 부분이 부정확한 정보임을 보여주며, 이런 부정확성과 불확실성에도 불구하고 다수의 질의가 성공적임을 알려준다. 또한 어용론의 이론으로써 부정확한 질의의 예기치 않은 성공에 대한 부분적 설명을 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allen, B. 1989. “Recall cues in known-item retrieval.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4): 246-252 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198907)40:4<246::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-Z
  2. Baker, S. L. & F. W. Lancaster. 1991. The measurement and evaluation of library services (2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press
  3. Bainbridge, D., S. J. Cunningham, and J. S. Downie. 2003. “How people describe their music information needs: a grounded theory analysis of music queries.” Proc. of ISMIR (International Society of Music Information Retrieval) 2003 (pp.221-222). Baltimore, USA
  4. Birner, B. J. 1991. Discourse entities and the referential/attributive distinction. Paper presented at the 65th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago
  5. Blair, D. C. 2003. “Information retrieval and the philosophy of language.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37: 3-50 https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370102
  6. Byrd, D. and T. Crawford. 2002. “Problems of music information retrieval in the real world.” Information Processing and Management, 38(2): 249-271 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00033-4
  7. Cunningham, S. J., N. Reeves, and M. Britland. 2003. An ethnographic study of music information seeking: implications for the design of a music digital library. Proc. of JCDL 2003 (pp.5-16). Houston, Texas
  8. Donnellan, K. S. 1966. “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” Philosophical Review, 75: 281-304 https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143
  9. Downie, J. S. 1994. “The Musifind musical information retrieval project, phase ii: user assessment survey.” Proc. of the 22nd Annual Conf. of the CAIS, 149-166
  10. Downie, J. S., and S. J. Cunningham. 2002. Toward a theory of music information retrieval queries: system design implications. Proc. of ISMIR 2002 (pp.299-300). Paris, France
  11. Dwyer, C. M., E. A. Gossen, and L. M. Martin. 1991. “Known- item search failure in an OPAC.” RQ, 31(2): 228-236
  12. Futrelle, J. and J. S. Downie. 2003. “Interdisciplinary research issues in music information retrieval: ISMIR 2000-2002.” Journal of New Music Research, 32(2): 121-131 https://doi.org/10.1076/jnmr.32.2.121.16740
  13. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol.3, pp.41-58). New York: Seminar Press
  14. Itoh, M. 2000. Subject search for music: quantitative analysis of access point selection. Proc. of ISMIR 2000. Amherst, MA
  15. Jackson, S. L., and ALA. 1958. Catalog use study: director's report. Chicago: ALA
  16. Katz, B. 2002/2003. “Digital reference: an overview.” The Reference Librarian, (79/80), 1-17
  17. Kim, J.-Y., and N. J. Belkin. 2002. Categories of music description and search terms and phrases used by non-music experts. Proc. of ISMIR 2002 (pp.209-214). Paris, France
  18. Kronfeld, A. 1986. “Donnellan's distinction and a computational model of reference.” Proc. of the 24th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 185-191
  19. Lancaster, F. W. 1998. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois
  20. Laplante, A., and J. S. Downie. 2006. “Everyday life music information-seeking behaviour of young adults.” Proc. of ISMIR 2006 (pp.381-382). Victoria, Canada
  21. Lee, J. H. 2008. Analysis of information features in natural language queries for music information retrieval: use patterns and accuracy. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  22. Lee, J. H., and J. S. Downie. 2004. Survey of music information needs, uses, and seeking behaviours: preliminary findings. Proc. of ISMIR 2004 (pp.441-446). Barcelona, Spain
  23. Lee, J. H., J. S. Downie, and S. J. Cunningham. 2005a. Challenges in cross-cultural/ multilingual music information seeking. Proc. of ISMIR 2005 (pp.1-7). London, UK
  24. Lee, J. H., X. Hu, and J. S. Downie. 2005b. Q&A websites: rich research resources for contextualizing information retrieval behaviors. Proc. of the ACM SIGIR 2005 Workshop on Info. Retrieval in Context (pp.33-36). Salvador, Brazil
  25. Lee, J. H. and A. Renear. 2007. How incorrect information delivers correct search results: a pragmatic analysis of queries. Proc. of the 70th ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Milwaukee, Wisconson
  26. Lee, Y. J. and S. B. Moon. 2006. A user study on information searching behaviors for designing user-centered query interface of content-based music information retrieval system. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 23(2): 5-19 https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.2.005
  27. Lewis, D. W. 1987. “Research on the use of online catalogs and its implications for library practice.” Journal of Academic Librarianship, 13(3): 152-156
  28. McPherson, J. R. and D. Bainbridge. 2001. Usage of the MELDEX digital music library. Proc. of ISMIR 2001(pp.19-20). Bloomington, IN
  29. Ng, K. B. 2002. “The applicability of universal pragmatics in IR interaction: a pilot study.” Information Processing and Management, 38: 237-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00030-9
  30. Onishi, K. H., and G. L. Murphy. 2002. “Discourse model representation of referential and attributive descriptions.” Language and Cognitive Processes, 17: 97-123 https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000166
  31. Swanson, D. R. 1972. Requirements study for future catalogs. Final report to the National Science Foundation. Chicago: The University
  32. Taheri-Panah, S., and A. MacFarlane. 2004. “Music information retrieval systems: why do individuals use them and what are their needs?” Proc. of ISMIR 2004 (pp.455-460). Barcelona, Spain
  33. University of Chicago. Graduate Library School, Swanson, D. R., Vaughan, D. K., & Cooper, W. S. (1968). Requirements study for future catalogs. Progress report no. 2. Chicago