Automotive Body Design

차량 차체 설계

  • 이정익 (인하공업전문대학 기계시스템학부 기계설계과) ;
  • 김병곤 (군산대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 정태진 (군산대학교 기계공학과)
  • Published : 2008.10.15

Abstract

In an automotive body structure, a design configuration that fulfills structural requirements such as deflection, stiffness and strength is necessary for structural design and is composed of various components. The integrated design is used to obtain a minimum weight structure with optimal or feasible performance based on conflicting constraints and boundaries. The mechanical design must begin with the definition of one or more concepts for structure and specification requirements in a given application environment. Structural optimization is then introduced as an integral part of the product design and used to yield a superior design to the conventional linear one. Although finite element analysis has been firmly established and extensively used in the past, geometric and material nonlinear analyses have also received considerable attention over the past decades. Also, nonlinear analysis may be useful in the area of structural designs where instability phenomena can include critical design criteria such as plastic strain and residual deformation. This proposed approach can be used for complicated structural analysis for an integrated design process with the nonlinear feasible local flexibilities between system and subsystems.

Keywords

References

  1. Huizinga, A. T. M. J. M., Campen, D. H., and Kraker, A., 1997, "Application of Hybrid Frequency Domain Substructuring for Modeling and Automotive Engine Suspension," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 119, pp. 304-310 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2889724
  2. Wyckaert, K., Brughmans, M., Zhang, C., and Dupont, R., 1997, "Hybrid Substructuring for Vibro-Acoustical Optimisation: Application to Suspension - Car Body Interaction," Proceedings of the SAE Noise & Vibration Conference, pp. 591-598
  3. Heo, J. H. and Ehmann, K. F., 1991, "A Method for Substructural Sensitivity Synthesis," Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 113, pp. 201-208 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2930170
  4. Santos, J. M. C. and Arruda, J. R. F., 1990, "Finite Element Model Updating Using Frequency Response Functions and Component Mode Synthesis," Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference, pp. 1195-1201
  5. Lallemand, B., Level, P., Duveau, H., and Mahieux, B., 1999, "Eigensolutions Sensitivity analysis using a substructuring method," Computer & Structures, Vol. 71, pp. 257-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00231-4
  6. Jee, T. H., 1995, "Structural Parameter Identification and Dynamic Modification Using Frequency Response Sensitivity of Substructures," Ph.D. Thesis, Yonsei University, Korea
  7. Ting, T., 1993, "Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Frequency Response," American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 1965-1967 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.49114
  8. Ochsner, S. D. and Bernhard, R. J., 1995, "Application of a component mobility technique to automotive suspension systems," Noise Control Engineering Journal, Vol. 43, pp. 73-82 https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2828367
  9. Neuwirth, E., Hunter, K., Dittmann, K. J., and Singh, P., 2004, "Experience in use of a virtual test laboratory (VTL) for dynamic multibody simulation (MBS) of full vehicle durability testing," Numerical Analysis and Simulation in Vehicle Engineering, Vol. 46, pp. 381-408
  10. Stensson, A., Asplund, C., and Karlsson, L., 1994, "The nonlinear behavior of a Macpherson strut wheel suspension," Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 23, pp. 85-106 https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119408969051
  11. Yim, H. J. and Lee, S. B., 1996, "An integrated CAE system for dynamic stress and fatigue life prediction of mechanical systems," KSME Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 158-168 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02953655
  12. Su, H., 2000, "Automotive CAE durability analysis using random vibration approach," MSC 2nd Worldwide Automotive Conference, Dearborn, MI, Oct
  13. Lee, D. C., Jang, J. H., and Han, C. S., 2006, "Design consideration of mechanical structure with geometric and material non-linearities," Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part D; Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 220, No. 3, pp. 281-288 https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070JAUTO21
  14. Lee, D. C., 2004, "A design of panel structure for the improvement of dynamic stiffness," Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs, Part D; Journal of Automobile Engineering, Vol. 218, No. 6, pp. 647-654 https://doi.org/10.1243/0954407041166058
  15. Lee, D. C., Choi, H. S., and Han, C. S., 2006, "Design of automotive body structure using multicriteria optimization," Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 161-167 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-005-0577-2
  16. Singiresu, S. Rao, 2002, Engineering optimization-theory and practice, 3rd edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., USA
  17. Ding, Y. L., 1986, "Shape optimization of structures: A literature survey," Computers & Structures, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 985-1004 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(86)90307-X
  18. Bendsoe, M. P. and Kikuchi, N., 1988, "Generating optimal topologies for structural design using a homogenization method," Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, Vol. 71, pp. 197-224 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
  19. Bendsoe, M. P., 1989, "Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem," Structural Optimization, Vol. 1, pp. 193-202 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01650949