A Study on the Singularity of Mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$ in the Contemporary Interior Architecture

현대실내건축의 미장센적 특이성에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

This thesis sets out to study the immanent mechanism of architectural space which had been classified as external space in general. The mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$ could consider one among various immanent tools to deal with the singularity of interior architecture. An imaginary interrelationship between cinema and architecture offers a possibility which a mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$ could be used with a space making equipment. The mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$ is a conscious equipment to lead a meta-function of simple visual-perception. The mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$-space has been supposed to visual-perception cases and conscious cases in interior architecture. In particular, as a result of analysis, it becomes clear that the mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$-space is a kind of something signifer to expose designers's an abyss of conscious and unconscious. In my opinion, this is the very way that the contemporary interior architecture is exposed to its singularity by a mechanism of mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$-space. In conclusion, the psychoanalysis-frame of mise en $sc{\acute{e}}ne$-space has brought out any possibility of an interpretation about architectural immanent themes like a subject, meaning creation, and construction logic, and it has also been useful to reveal the architectural singularity.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthony Vidler, The Architectural Uncanny, MIT Press, 1992
  2. Christian Metz, Essais sur la Signifination au cinEma I, Klincksieck
  3. Frame ed., Fabio Novembre, Birkhauser, 2001
  4. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection. trans. Alan Sheridan, London: Tavistock Publications, 1977
  5. Victor Turner, Image and Pilgrimage in Christian Culture: Anthropological Perspectives, N.Y.: Columbia University Press, 1978
  6. Taschen ed., Starck, Taschen, 1999
  7. 렘 콜하스, 김원갑 역, 광기의 뉴욕, 세진사, 2001
  8. 베이트리체 콜로미냐, 강미선 외 역, 섹슈얼리티와 공간, 동녘, 2005
  9. 슬라보예 지젝, 김소연. 유재희 역, 삐딱하게 보기, 시각과 언어, 1995
  10. 자크 오몽 外, 이용주 역, 영화미학, 동문선, 2003
  11. 파스칼 보니체, 홍지화 역, 영화와 회화, 동문선, 2003
  12. 김상환. 홍준기, 라깡의 재탄생, 창작과 비평사, 2005
  13. 정인하, 투시도법과 디지털 표현방식의 비교를 통한 비표상적 건축에 관한 연구, 건축역사연구 통권 34호, 2003-06
  14. 안은희, 공간-환상을 통해서 본 현대실내건축의 특이성 연구, 경원대 박논, 2007
  15. 안은희. 이정욱, 실내건축의 욕망유형을 통한 욕망구조 특성에 관한 연구, 한국실내디자인학회논문집 통권63호, 2007-08
  16. http://cglink.co.kr/zb/view.php?id=DIC&no=432, 2008-08-11