Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지

A comparison of agglutination tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the bovine brucellosis

소 브루셀라병 혈청 항체가 응집반응 비교 시험

  • Kim, Cheol-Ho (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Bang, Sang-Young (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Jeon, Jae-Hyung (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Bhak, Jong-Sik (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Min-Kwon (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute) ;
  • Shin, Jung-Sub (North branch of Gyeongsangnamdo Livestock Promotion Research Institute)
  • 김철호 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소) ;
  • 방상영 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소) ;
  • 전재형 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소) ;
  • 박종식 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소) ;
  • 이민권 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소) ;
  • 신정섭 (경상남도 축산 진흥연구소 북부지소)
  • Published : 2008.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A total of 710 bovine serum samples which are composed 532 bovine serum samples showed negative reaction and 178 bovine serum samples showed positive reaction with tube agglutination test (TAT) from North area of Gyeong-nam, Korea were tested using all the 3 assays which are Rose-Bengal test(RBT), tube agglutination test (TAT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, two types) and analyzed for evaluation of specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility and predictive value. In the comparison of serum antibody titer agglutination test, RBT showed almost agreement with TAT. In the comparison of TAT and two types of ELISA method, they showed difference in specificity and sensitivity about 5%. But there is no significant difference in detecting sensitivity between two types of ELISA method and TAT. In serologic tests for bovine brucellosis, the new assay ELISA would be a good candidate for serologic survey for bovine brucellosis in Korea because it is efficient in detecting many test samples quickly. But the serum agglutination tests (RBT, TAT) are more economical and easy assay for detection. In the test of comparison of antibody titer between first day of finding and 10 days after finding by TAT, there was no change in 55% (76/139) of positive cattle.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립수의과학검역원. 2006. 동물 부루세라병 국제 심포지움. 1-163
  2. 김금화, 안수환, 박용호 등. 1982, 부루세라병 검색에 사용되는 여러 가지 혈청학적 진단법의 비교연구. 대한수의학회지. 22(2):149-153
  3. 김두희, 정병탁, 문재봉. 1968. 부루셀라 감염한우에 대한 혈청학적 연구. 농사시험연구보고 11:1-18
  4. Timoney JF, Gillespie JH, Scott FW et al. 1988. Hagan and Bruner's microbio-logy and infectious diseases of domestic animals. Cornell University Press. 8 eds. Ithaca:135-152
  5. Morgan WJB, Mackinnon DJ, Cullen GA. 1969. The Rose Bengal Plate agglu-tination test in the diagnosis of brucel-losis. Vet Rec 85:636 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.85.23.636
  6. Myer ME. 1990. Brucella of Review of Veterinary Microbiology. Blackwell Scien-tific Pubilication Inc:250-258
  7. Ariza J, Servitje O, Pallares R, et al. 1989. Characteristic cutaneous lesions in patients with brucellosis. Arch Dermatol 125:380-383 https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.125.3.380
  8. Berger TG, Guill MA, Goette DK. 1981. Cutaneous lesions in brucellosis. Arch Dermatol 117 : 40-42 https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.117.1.40
  9. Qiomm PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, er al. 1994. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Wolfe Press : 261-267
  10. Tekkoke KIH, Berker M, Ozcan et al. 1993. Brucellosis of the spine. Neuro-surgery 33:838-844
  11. Vallat B, 2004. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals(mam-mals, birds and bees). 5 eds. Office International Des Epizooties. Paris:409-438
  12. 농촌진흥청 가축위행연구소. 1991. 한국의 가축위생연구(가축위생연구소 80년사). 박근식 발행. 박정문 편집. 도서출판 상록:77-82
  13. 농림수산부예규. 1988(1. 11). 제 142호 제 10조 제 15조
  14. 농림부. 제 2007-15(2007.03.16)호. 결핵병 및 부루세라병방역실시요령
  15. 박동권, 이창희. 1959. 우리나라에 발생한 축우 Brucella 증에 대하여. 수의계 3:192-195
  16. 손준용, 이길웅, 유재창 등. 1986. Zoonosis 부루셀라증에 관한 연구. 국립보건원보 23:281-295
  17. 임윤규, 양기천, 이경갑 등. 1995. SDS 처리한 브루셀라항원과 Yersinia entero- colitica 0:9주의 혈청학적 교차반응 연구. 대한수의학회지 35(1):143-148
  18. 정석찬, 조동희, 남향미 등. 2007. 국내 소 Brucella병의 발생 및 연구동향. 한국수의공중보건학회지 31(2):91-103
  19. Alton GG, Jones LM, Pietz DE. 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. Mono-graph series. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
  20. Alastair M. 1990. Conventional serologi-cal tests. In: Animal Brucellosis. Mielsen K, Duncan R, ed. CRC Press:153-198
  21. OIE. 2004. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. 5 eds:409-438
  22. Godfroid J, Saegerman C, Wellemans V, et al. 2002. How to substantiate eradica-tion of bovine brucellosis when aspeci-fic serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing. Vet Micro-biol 90:461-477 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00230-4
  23. Nielsen K. 2002. Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology. Vet Microbiol 90:447-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00229-8
  24. 김금화, 안수환, 박용호 등. 1982. 브루셀라병 검색에 사용되는 여러 가지 혈청 진단법의 비교 연구. 대한수의사학회지 22(2):149-153
  25. Lambert G, Amerault TE. 1962. Compara-tive study of three serological tests for detecting the response in cattle to virulent Brucella abortus. Am J Vet Res 23:529-537
  26. Flores-Castro R, Carmichael LE. 1980. Canine brucellosis. Curr Vet Ther 7:1303-1305
  27. Alton G.G, Jones LM. 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. World Health Organization, Geneva:1-163
  28. USDA. 1985. Brucellosis eradication: Uniform methods and rules. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Iowa
  29. Morgan WJA, Mackinnon DJ, Gill KW. 1978. Brucellosis diagnosis standard labora-tory techniques. 2eds. Ministry of Agri-culture, Fisheries and Food:1-53
  30. Nielson K, Kelly L, Gall D, et al. 1996. Comparison of enzyme immunoassays for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Prev Ver Med 26:17-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(95)00513-7
  31. Wright PF, Nilsson Em Van Rooij EMA, et al. 1993. Standardization and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the cetection df antibody in infectious disease diagnosis. Rev Sci Tecdh Off Int Epiz 12:435-450 https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.12.2.691
  32. Morgan WJB, MacKinnon DJ, Lawson JR, et al. 1969. The rose bengal plate agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis. Vet Rec 85:636-641 https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.85.23.636
  33. Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, et al. 1988. Techniques for the Brucellosis labo-ratory. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. Paris
  34. 농림부, 국립수의과학검역원. 2006. 소 부루셀라병표준방역지침:3-88
  35. George WB. 1995. Handbook of zoonoses. 2eds. CRC Press. London: 9-39
  36. USDA. 2003. Brucellosis eradication : uniform methods and rules. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Iowa:1-121
  37. 허 진, Kakoma I, 정재명, 등. 2007. 소 브루셀라병의 혈청학적 진단법 비교 실험. 한가위지 30(3):385-391
  38. Pama AE, Santisteban G, Margini RA. 1984. Analysis and in vivo agglutination and nonagglutination antibodies. Vet Micro-biol 9:391-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(84)90008-7
  39. Wright PF, Tounkara K, Lelenta M, et al. 1997. international reference Stan-dards: antibody standards for the indi-rect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Rev Sci Tech 3:824-832
  40. 김수업. 1956. Brucella abortus 19 strain과 Enteric bacteria와의 혈청 면역학적 관계. 가축위생연구소 연구보고 4:39-76
  41. 김종만 정석찬, 박정문, 등. 1988. 부루셀라 양성우에서 분리한 부루셀라병 양성우에서 분리한 부루셀라균의 성상과 혈청학적진단법 비교. 농사시험 연구논문집(가축위생편) 20(1):1-6
  42. 임윤규, 이두식, 박전홍, 등. 1993. 축우 부루셀라병의 ELISA 진단법에 관한 연구. 대한 수의학회지 33(1):131-135
  43. 심항섭, 국정희, 정봉수, 등. 1998. 효소면역법을 이용한 Brucella abortus 항체 검출에 관한 연구. 한가위지 21(2): 107-115
  44. 김병구, 정병탁, 차연호. 1963. Brucellosis에 대한 혈청학적 검토(1) 특히 인공감염 한우를 중심으로 한 고찰. 가축위생연구보고 9:40-50