DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robotized Filament Winding of Full Section Parts: Comparison Between Two Winding Trajectory Planning Rules

  • Sorrentino, L. (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universita degli Studi di Cassino) ;
  • Polini, W. (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universita degli Studi di Cassino) ;
  • Carrino, L. (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universita degli Studi di Cassino) ;
  • Anamateros, E. (Agusta Westland SpA, Aerospace Composite Center) ;
  • Paris, G. (Agusta Westland SpA, Aerospace Composite Center)
  • Published : 2008.03.01

Abstract

Robotized filament winding technology involves a robot that winds a roving impregnated by resin on a die along the directions of stresses to which the work-piece is submitted in applications. The robot moves a deposition head along a winding trajectory in order to deposit roving. The trajectory planning is a very critical aspect of robotized filament winding technology, since it is responsible for both the tension constancy and the winding time. The present work shows two original rules to plan the winding trajectory of structural parts, whose shape is obtained by sweeping a full section around a 3D curve that must be closed and not crossing in order to assure a continuous winding. The first rule plans the winding trajectory by approximating the part 3D shape with straight lines; it is called the discretized rule. The second rule defines the winding trajectory simply by offsetting a 3D curve that reproduces the part 3D shape, of a defined distance; it is called the offset rule. The two rules have been compared in terms of roving tension and winding time. The present work shows how the offset rule enables achievement of both the required aims: to manufacture parts of high structural performances by keeping the tension on the roving near to the nominal value and to markedly decrease the winding time. This is the first step towards the optimization of the robotized filament winding technology.

Keywords

References

  1. K. V. Steiner, Development of a robotic filament winding workstation for complex geometries, in: 35th Int. SAMPE Symp. Exhibition Proc., Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 757-766 (1990)
  2. D. A. Saravanos and J. S. Lamancusa, Optimum structural design of robotic manipulators with fiber reinforced composite materials, Computers and Structures 36, 119-132 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(90)90181-Z
  3. S. Cantoni, F. De Nicola, G. Di Vita, G. Totano and M. Farioli, Computer aided manufacturing of composite complex shape helicopter structural elements by robot winding, in: 25th Eur. Rotocraft Forum, Roma, Italy (1999)
  4. J. Scholliers and H. Van Brussel, Computer-integrated filament winding: computer-integrated design, robotic filament winding and robotic quality control, Comp. Manuf. 5, 15-23 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7143(94)90015-9
  5. L. Markov and R. M. H. Cheng, Conceptual design of robotic filament winding complexes, Mechatronics 6, 881-896 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(96)00032-3
  6. S. Seereeram and J. Y. Wen, An all geodesic algorithm for filament winding of a T-shaped form, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 3, 484-490 (1991)
  7. J. Scholliers and H. Van Brussel, Design and off-line programming of a robotic tape winding cell, Robot. Computer-Integrated Manuf. 12, 93-98 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-5845(95)00021-6
  8. S. Chan, M. Munro and A. Fahim, Accuracy-speed relationships of a robotic filament winding cell, Robot. Computer-Integrated Manuf. 12, 3-13 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0736-5845(95)00025-9
  9. D. Cohen, Influence of filament winding parameters on composite vessel quality and strength, Composites Part A 28, 1035-1047 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00073-0
  10. B. Lauke and K. Friedrich, Evaluation of processing parameters of thermoplastic composites fabricated by filament winding, Compos. Manuf. 4, 93-101 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7143(93)90076-K
  11. T. Imamura, T. Kuroiwa, K. Terashima and H. Takemoto, Design and tension control of filament winding system, IEEE Int. Conf. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2, 660-670 (1999)
  12. P. Mertiny and F. Ellyin, Influence of the filament winding tension on physical and mechanical properties of reinforced composites, Composites: Part A 33, 1615-1622 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00209-9
  13. L. Carrino, W. Polini and L. Sorrentino, Modular structure of a new feed-deposition head for a robotized filament winding cell, Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 2255-2263 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00174-X
  14. L. Carrino, W. Polini and L. Sorrentino, Experimental validation of a new fibre deposition device for a robotized filament winding cell, in: Proc. ECCM10 10th Eur. Conf. Compos. Mater. Abstract 311 Brugge, Belgium, June 3-7 (2002)
  15. L. Carrino, W. Polini and L. Sorrentino, A new robotized filament winding cell to manufacture complex shape parts, SME Technical Papers, ID: TP03PUB226, Paper No: EM03-324 (2003)
  16. W. Polini and L. Sorrentino, Influence of winding speed and winding trajectory on tension in robotized filament winding of full section parts, Compos. Sci. Technol. 65, 1574-1581 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.007