Environmental Engineering Research

Korean Society of Environmental Engineers (대한환경공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting Methane Production Potential of Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste

  • Shin, Joung-Du (Department of Environmental Ecology, Agro-Environmental Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Han, Sung-Su (Department of Environmental Ecology, Agro-Environmental Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Eom, Ki-Cheol (Department of Environmental Ecology, Agro-Environmental Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Sung, Shi-Hwu (Department of Civil, Concentration and Environmental Engineering, Ames, Iowa State University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Won (Department of Civil, Concentration and Environmental Engineering, Ames, Iowa State University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Ook (Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul)
  • Published : 2008.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and food waste for biogas production was performed in serum bottles at 2% volatile solids(VS) concentration and various mixing ratios of two substrates(swine manure: food waste = 100 : 0 $\sim$ 0 : 100). Through kinetic mode of surface methodology, the methane production was fitted to a Gompertz equation. The specific methane production potential of swine manure alone was lower than that of food waste. However, maximum methane production potential increased up to 1.09-1.22% as food waste composition increased up to the 80%. The maximum methane production value of food waste was 544.52 mL/g VS. It was observed that the maximum methane production potential of 601.86 mL/g VS was found at the mixing ratio of 40:60.

Keywords

References

  1. O. S. U., Ohio livestock manure and waster management guide. Bulletin 604, Ohio State University Extension (2000)
  2. Ministry of Environment, The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2001. Seoul, Korea (2002)
  3. Ministry of Environment, The state of solid waste generation and treatment in 2005. Seoul, Korea (2005)
  4. Han, S.-K., and Shin, H.-S., "Enhanced acidogenic fermentation of food waste in continuous-flow reactor," Waste Manage Res 2002, 20, 110-118 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0202000202
  5. Lafitte-Trouque, S., and Forster, C. F., "Dual anaerobic codigestion of swage sludge and confectionery waste," Bioresource Technol., 71, 77-81 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00043-7
  6. Schafter, P. L., and Farrel, J. B., "Advanced anaerobic digestion systems," Water Environ Technol., 12(11), 26-32 (2000)
  7. APHA AWWA WEF, Standard methods for the examination of waster and wastewater. 20th ed., APAH, Washington DC (1988)
  8. Owen, W. F., Stuckey, D. C., Healy, Jr J. B., Young, L. Y., and McCarty, P. L., "Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity," Water Res. 13, 485-493 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90043-5
  9. Yang, K., Yu, Y., and Hwang, S., "Selective optimization in thermophilic acidogenesis of cheese-whey wastewater to acetic and butyric acids: partial acidification and methanation," Water Res., 37, 2467-2477 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00006-X
  10. Momirlan, M., and Veziroglu, T., "Recent directions of world hydrogen production," Renew Sust. Energy Rev., 3, 219-231 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00017-3
  11. Chae, K. J., Jang, A. M., Yim, S. K., and Kim, In S., "The effects of digestion temperature and temperature shock on the biogas yields from the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Bioresource technol., 99, 1-6 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.11.063
  12. Momirlan, M., and Veziroglu, T., "Recent directions of world hydrogen production," Renew Sust Energy Rev., 3, 219-231 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(98)00017-3
  13. Lay, J.-J., "Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline cellulose," Biotechnol Bioeng., 74(4), 280-287 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.1118
  14. Lee, Y. J., Miyahara, T., and Noike, T., "Effect of iron concentration on hydrogen fermentation," Bioresource Technol., 80, 227-231 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00067-0
  15. Chen, C-C., Lin, C-Y., and Lin, M-C., "Acid-based enrichment enhances anaerobic hydrogen production process," Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol., 58, 224-228 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100814
  16. Lethtomaki, A., Huttunen, S., and Rintala, J. A., "Laboratory investigation on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: Effect of crop to manure ratio," Resources Conservation & Recycling, 51, 591-609 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.11.004

Cited by

  1. Anaerobic Digestion Treatment for the Mixture of Chinese Cabbage Waste Juice and Swine Manure vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.1.058
  2. Kinetic Study of the Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure at Mesophilic Temperature: A Lab Scale Batch Operation vol.37, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2012.37.4.233
  3. Effects of digestion temperatures and loading amounts on methane production from anaerobic digestion with crop residues vol.16, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2015.16.4.265
  4. Anaerobic digestion of food waste to methane at various organic loading rates (OLRs) and hydraulic retention times (HRTs): Thermophilic vs. mesophilic regimes vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2015.068
  5. Development of Mathematical Models and Application of the Modified Gompertz Model for Designing Batch Biogas Reactors vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9482-8
  6. A short review on hydrothermal liquefaction of livestock manure and a chance for Korea to advance swine manure to bio-oil technology pp.1611-8227, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0566-0
  7. The effect of substrate/inoculum ratio on the kinetics of methane production in swine wastewater anaerobic digestion pp.1614-7499, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0039-6
  8. Study of Biogas Production from Wastes in Military Areas vol.953-954, pp.1662-8985, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.953-954.246
  9. Utilization of Delignified Sawdust as Raw Material of Biogas Production vol.156, pp.2261-236X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815603054
  10. Effect of seaweed addition on enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste and sewage sludge vol.24, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.275
  11. Methane Production Potential of Food Waste and Food Waste Mixture with Swine Manure in Anaerobic Digestion vol.37, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5307/jbe.2012.37.2.100
  12. Anaerobic digestion of Chinese cabbage waste silage with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous study. vol.35, pp.21, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.919033
  13. Predicting Methane Production on Anaerobic Digestion to Crop Residues and Biomass Loading Rates vol.24, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.17137/korrae.2016.24.3.75
  14. Estimation of potential methane production through the mass balance equations from agricultural biomass in Korea vol.59, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-016-0224-1
  15. Treatment of feces from beef cattle fed the enteric methane inhibitor 3-nitrooxypropanol vol.80, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2019.302
  16. Microbial consortia composition on the production of methane from sugarcane vinasse vol.10, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00426-0
  17. Effect of substrate-to-inoculum ratio on anaerobic digestion of treated and untreated cotton textile waste vol.18, pp.2, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02831-9