Issues and Perception on Management Fee and Rental Payment Overdue of Permanent Rental Housing Residents

영구임대주택 입주자의 관리비 및 임대료 체납 실태와 의식

  • Published : 2007.10.25

Abstract

Permanent rental housing, the construction of which was strongly financed by the central government, is regarded as a social housing for those who fall within the lowest income bracket. Differing from "public rental housing", offered to tenants for sale after a five year rental period, this type of housing is intended for rental use on a long-tenn basis. At present, about 190,000 permanent rental housing units exist in Korea. According to a statistics, 15.6% of its residents did not pay their management fee and rental payment in 4 or more months in 2005, which places stress on the housing management. Based on the "eviction condition" stipulated in the tenancy agreement for permanent rental housing, a householder owning assets or a vehicle which is not used as his means of living, who is overdue with his management fee and rental payment for a long time, may be evicted from the house. However, there are many conflicts and problems between administrators/housing managers and residents in the process of enforcing this regulation. The purpose of this study is to explore the key issues associated with the present situation and the reasons why so many management fee and rental payment for permanent rental housing are overdue. For the purpose of research, data were collected from 10,990 permanent rental housing residents nationwide via a questionnaire survey in February 2007. One third of the respondents had an experience of more than 2 months overdue since they have moved in current residence. For further analysis, the respondents were divided into three groups, based on their working ability. The major finding showed that the group of respondents who have working ability required a more practical plan, such as employment, to have a sustainable life, while the other group of no labor force indicated a need for more housing allowance from the government. To suggest more specific alternatives for the subject of housing payment overdue, further comparison study should be performed between the residents of permanent rental housing and other low income tenants in private housing sector.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부(2004), 임대료보조제도 확대도입방안 연구
  2. 김영태(2006), 프랑스 주거복지정책 100년의 교훈, 삼성경제연구소
  3. 김정호(2001), 영구임대주택정책의 효과성평가: 전.후비교법을 중심으로. 국토계획, 36(7), 285-296
  4. 대한주택공사(2006), 국민임대주택 임대료 산정 체계 개편 방안연구
  5. 박은규(2004), 공공임대주택 저소득 임차가구를 위한 지자체의 복지프로그램 확대적용 방안. 대한주택공사 주택 도시연구원
  6. 보건복지부(2006), 2006년 국민기초생활보장사업 안내
  7. 보건복지부.한국도시연구소(2003), 공공임대주택 입주민의 사회통합지원방안모색
  8. 빈부격차.차별시정위원회(2006), 영구임대주택 단지내 사회복지관과 관리사무소의 업무 역할 분담 및 운영실태 분석을 통한 관리체계 개선방안
  9. 서울시정개발연구원(2002), 서울시 영구임대주택 주민의 생활
  10. 얼쇼리스(2006), 희망의 인문학, 이매진
  11. 임재만(2002), "영구임대주택의 문제점과 해결방안에 관한 연구" 대구대학교 사회과학연구소 사회과학연구, 10(1), 1-14
  12. 한국도시연구소(2001), 공공임대주택 관리 전문화 방안
  13. 한국도시연구소(2005), 영구임대주택 주거실태조사