Korean Journal of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Community Nutrition (대한지역사회영양학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of the Reduced Portion Size by Using a Diet Rice Bowl on Food Consumption and Satiety Rate

밥의 1회 섭취량을 줄인 다이어트 밥그릇이 음식섭취량과 포만도에 미치는 영향

  • Chang, Un-Jae (Department of Food & Nutrition, DongDuk Women's University) ;
  • Jung, Eun-Young (Department of Food & Nutrition, Korea University) ;
  • Hong, In-Sun (Department of Food & Nutrition, DongDuk Women's University)
  • 장은재 (동덕여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 정은영 (고려대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 홍인선 (동덕여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Published : 2007.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Using the diet rice bowl, this study examined whether visual cues related to portion size can influence intake volume without altering satiation. 24 subjects ate lunch and subsequent dinner meal in the lab once a week for 2 weeks. Each week at noon, they were served one of two different sizes of a rice (150 g of rice by the diet rice bowl and 210 g of rice by the general rice bowl) but recognized the same volume of which they could eat as much as they wanted of side dishes. Subjects returned to the lab five hours later for a standard dinner, which was consumed ad libitum. Results showed that the subjects who were eating from the diet rice bowl ate less rice (222.4 Kcal vs 306.5 Kcal, p < 0.001) and total energy intake (412.5 Kcal vs 499.2 Kcal, p < 0.001) than those eating from a general rice bowl at lunch. However, despite consuming 21% less energy intake at lunch, the rates of satiety were not significantly different after eating from the diet rice bowl and from the general diet bowl. And there were no significant difference in rice intake and energy intake at dinner between the diet rice bowl and the general rice bowl. These results suggest decreasing the portion size by the diet rice bowl with biased visual cues leads to decreased rice intake and energy intake without altering the satiation. This is, the decreased amount of rice in a diet rice bowl may implicitly suggest what might be construed as an appropriate amount to consume and eventually it suggests smaller consumption norms.

Keywords

References

  1. Brehm BJ, Seeley RJ, Daniels SR, D'Alessio DA (2003): A randomized trial comparing a very low carbohydrate diet and a calorie-restricted low fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(4): 1617-1623 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021480
  2. Chang VW, Christakis NA (2002): Medical modelling of obesity: A transition from action to experience in a 20th century American medical textbook. Soc Health Illness 24(2): 151-177 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00289
  3. Dansinger ML, Gleason JA, Griffith JL, Selker HP, Schaefer EJ (2005): Comparison of the Atkins, Omish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial. JAMA 293(1): 43-53 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.1.43
  4. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Martha T, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ (2004) : Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res 12(3): 562-568 https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2004.64
  5. EPM-Communications (2003): Parents' eating habits set a good example for children. Res Alert 4: 3-4
  6. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, Kim S, Stafford RS, Balise RR, Kraemer HC, King AC (2007): Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Omish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA 297(9): 969-977 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.9.969
  7. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE (1979): The Eating Attitudes Test: an index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychol Med 9(2): 273-279 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700030762
  8. Krassner HA, Brownell KD, Stunkard AJ (1979): Cleaning the plate: food left over by overweight and normal weight persons. Beh Res & Therapy 17: 155-156 https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(79)90024-X
  9. Ledikwe JH, Ello-Martin JA, Rolls BJ (2005): Portion size and the obesity epidemic. J Nutr 135(4): 905-909 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.4.905
  10. Nestle M (2003): Increasing portion sizes in American diets: more caloriew, more obesity. J Am Diet Assoc 103(1): 39-40
  11. Oh SY (2005): Food sharing characteristics in modern Korean society. Korean J Food culture 20: 683-687
  12. Rolls BJ (2003): The supersizing of America: Portion size and the obesity epidemic. Nutr Today 38: 645-649
  13. Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS (2002): Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 76(6): 1207-1213 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1207
  14. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Kral TV, Meengs JS, Wall DE (2004): Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women. Appetite 42: 63-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00117-X
  15. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS, Wall DE (2004): Increasing the portion size of a sandwich increases energy intake. J Am Diet Assoc 104(3): 367-372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2003.12.013
  16. Son SM (2001): Rice based meal for prevention of obesity and chronic disease. Korean J Comm Nutr 6(5): 862-867
  17. The third Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES III) (2005) : Ministry of Health and Welfare (Korea)
  18. Wansink B (1996): Can package size accelerate usage volume? J Marketing 60: 1-14
  19. Wansink B (2004): Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Ann Rev Nutr 24: 455-479 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140
  20. Wansink B, Kim J (2005): Bad popcorn in big buckets: portion size can influence intake as much as taste. J Nutr Educ Beh 37: 242-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60278-9
  21. Wansink B, Painter JE, North J (2005): Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res 13(1): 93-100 https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.12
  22. Young LR, Nestle M (2003): Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc 103(2): 231-234 https://doi.org/10.1053/jada.2003.50027
  23. Zung WK (1986): Zung self-rating depression scale and depression status inventory. Assessment of depression. In N Sartorius & TA Ban (Eds) 221-231