참고문헌
- Golledge J, Quigley FG. Pathogenesis of varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25(4):319-324 https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1843
- Benabou JE, Molnar LJ, Cerri GG. Duplex sonographic evaluation of the sapheno-femoral venous junction in patients with recurrent varicose veins after surgical treatment. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998;26(8):401-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199810)26:8<401::AID-JCU5>3.0.CO;2-M
- Erdman WA, Jayson HT, Redman HC, Miller GL, Parkey RQ, Peshock RW. Deep venous thrombosis of extremities: role of MR imaging in the diagnosis. Radiology. 1990;174:425-431 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.174.2.2404315
- Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelsin MH, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:131-135 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.161.1.8517292
- HoltZ DJ, Debatin JF, McKinnon GC, et al. MR venography of the calf: value of flow-enhanced time-of - flight echoplanar imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:663-668 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.3.8623646
- Kweon DC, Kim TH, Yang SH, Yoo BG, Kim MG, Park P. Subcutaneous injection contrast media extravasation: 3D CT appearance. Korean J Med Phys. 2005;16(1):47- 51
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard JA, Saini S. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology. 2004;230:619-628 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021726
- Brisse HJ, Madec L, Gaboriaud G, et al. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. Med Phys. 2007;34(7):3017-3033
- Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 1981;8(4):488-495 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594995
- McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002;22(6):1541-1553 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.226025128
- ImPACT CT patient dosimetry calculator version 0.99x. ImPACT. Medical devices agency. London. 2006
- Primak AN, McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Zhang J, Fletcher JG. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1785-1794 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.266065063
- Goldstone J. Veins and lymphatics, the current diagnosis and treatment of surgery. preoperative angiographic control. Phlebologie. 1993;46:521
- Callam MJ. Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg. 1994;81:167-173 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810204
- Labropoulos N, Giannoukas AD, Delis K, Mansour MA, Kang SS, Nicolaides AN, Lumley J, Baker WH. Where does venous reflux start? J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(5):736- 742 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70084-3
- Jutley RS, Cadle I, Cross KS. Preoperative assessment of primary varicose veins: a duplex study of venous incompetence. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21(4) :370-373 https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2001.1343
- Kweon DC, BG Yoo, Yang SH, Kim JG. Findings of an intravenous catheter fragment in the vein using the 3D image reformations of MDCT. Korean J Med Phys. 2006;17(3):167-172
- Greess H, Wolf H, Baum U, Lell M, Pirkl M, Kalender W, Bautz W. Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:391-394 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050062
- Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA. Dose reduction in multidetector CT using attenuation-based online tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181:331-334 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810331
- Giacomuzzi SM, Erckert B, Schopf T, et al. The smartscan procedure of spiral computed tomography: a new method for dose reduction. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 1996;165:10-16 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1015707
- Greess H, Nömayr A, Wolf H, et al. Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1571-1576 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1255-4
- Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J. Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:461-465 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790461
- Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, et al. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:1101-1106 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791101
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, D'Souza RV, Rizzo S, Halpern EF, Blake MA, Saini S. Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with Z-axis automatic tube current modulation: phantom and clinical studies. Radiology. 2005;235(2):523-529 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352040331
- Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, Halpern EF, Toth TL, Shepard JA, Aquino SL. Chest CT performed with Z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. Radiology. 2005;237(1):303-308 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2371041227
- Jones DG, Shrimpton PC. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Part 3: normalised organ doses calculated using Monte Carlo techniques (NRPB-R250). Chilton: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991
- DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, Cody DD, et al. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(9):2583-2597 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/9/017
- Groves AM, Owen KE, Courtney HM, Yates SJ, Goldstone KE, Blake GM, Dixon AK. 16-detector multislice CT: dosimetry estimation by TLD measurement compared with Monte Carlo simulation. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(920):662-625 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/48307881
- Tsapaki V, Aldrich JE, Sharma R, et al. Dose reduction in CT while maintaining diagnostic confidence: diagnostic reference levels at routine head, chest, and abdominal CTIAEA- coordinated research project. Radiology. 2006;240(3):828-834 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2403050993
- Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewes MA, Dunn M. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB): doses from computed tomography examinations in the UK-2003 review. Document NRPB-W67. Chilton, England: National Radiological Protection Board, 2005
- Namasivayam S, Kalra MK, Pottala KM, Waldrop SM, Hudgins PA. Optimization of Z-axis exposure control for multidetector row CT evaluation of neck and comparison with fixed tube current technique for image quality and radiation dose. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:2221-2225
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Kamath RS, Horiuchi T, Toth TL, Halpern EF, Saini S. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique performed in 153 patients. Radiology. 2004;233:241-249 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331031505
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Kamath RS, Halpern EF, Saini S. Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology. 2004;232:347-353 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322031304
- Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Schmidt B, Westerman BL, Morgan HT, Saini S. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology. 2004;233(3):649-657 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031150
- Hur G, Hong SW, Kim SY, Kim YH, Hwang YJ, Lee WR, Cha SJ. Uniform image quality achieved by tube current modulation using SD of attenuation in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(1): 188-196 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1201