Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MODELING OF A BUOYANCY-DRIVEN FLOW EXPERIMENT IN PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS USING CFD-METHODS

  • Hohne, Thomas (Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf(FZD)-Institute of Safety Research) ;
  • Kliem, Soren (Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf(FZD)-Institute of Safety Research)
  • Published : 2007.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The influence of density differences on the mixing of the primary loop inventory and the Emergency Core Cooling (ECC) water in the downcomer of a Pressurised Water Reactor (PWR) was analyzed at the ROssendorf COolant Mixing (ROCOM) test facility. ROCOM is a 1:5 scaled model of a German PWR, and has been designed for coolant mixing studies. It is equipped with advanced instrumentation, which delivers high-resolution information for temperature or boron concentration fields. This paper presents a ROCOM experiment in which water with higher density was injected into a cold leg of the reactor model. Wire-mesh sensors measuring the tracer concentration were installed in the cold leg and upper and lower part of the downcomer. The experiment was run with 5% of the design flow rate in one loop and 10% density difference between the ECC and loop water especially for the validation of the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software ANSYS CFX. A mesh with two million control volumes was used for the calculations. The effects of turbulence on the mean flow were modelled with a Reynolds stress turbulence model. The results of the experiment and of the numerical calculations show that mixing is dominated by buoyancy effects: At higher mass flow rates (close to nominal conditions) the injected slug propagates in the circumferential direction around the core barrel. Buoyancy effects reduce this circumferential propagation. Therefore, density effects play an important role during natural convection with ECC injection in PWRs. ANSYS CFX was able to predict the observed flow patterns and mixing phenomena quite well.

Keywords

References

  1. U. Grundmann, U. Rohde. Investigations on a boron dilution accident for a VVER-440 type reactor by the help of the code DYN3D. ANS Topical Meeting on Advances in Reactor Physics, Knoxville, TN. April 11-15, vol. 3, pp. 464-471, 1994
  2. D. Alvarez et al. Three dimensional calculations and experimental investigations of the primary coolant flow in a 900 MW PWR vessel. Proc. NURETH-5, vol. II, pp. 586-592, 1992
  3. F. Alavyoon, B. Hemstrom, N.G. Andersson, R. Karlsson. Experimental and computational approach to investigating rapid boron dilution transients in PWRs. CSNI Specialist Meeting on Boron Dilution Reactivity Transients, State College, Pennsylvania, USA, October 18-20, 1995
  4. H.-M. Prasser, G. Grunwald, U. Rohde, S. Kliem, T. Höhne, R. Karlsson, F.-P. Weiss. Coolant mixing in a Pressurized Water Reactor: Deboration Transients, Steam- Line Breaks, and Emergency Core Cooling Injection. Nuclear Technology 143 (1), p.37, 2003 https://doi.org/10.13182/NT03-A3396
  5. T. Hohne, Numerical Simulation of ISP-43 TEST A with CFX-4. Proceedings of 2002 ANS/ASME Student Conference. Penn State University, CD-ROM, 2002
  6. T. Hohne, Grunwald G., Prasser H.-M. Investigation of coolant mixing in Pressurized Water Reactors at the Rossendorf mixing test facility ROCOM. 8th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Baltimore, USA, CD-ROM, 2000
  7. HDR safety program – thermal mixing in the cold leg and downcomer of the HDR test rig, Report PHDR 91-89. FZ Karlsruhe, Germany, 1990
  8. K. Umminger, W. Kastner, J. Liebert, T. Mull. Thermal Hydraulics of PWR's with Respect to Boron Dilution Phenomena: Experimental Results from the Test Facilities PKL and UPTF. Ninth Int. Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH–9), San Francisco, California, USA, CD-ROM, 1999
  9. Y. A. Hassan, J. A. Randorf. Stratification Studies in Nuclear Reactor Components. NURETH-8, Kyoto, Japan, Vol 1, pp 449, 1997
  10. B. Woods. UM 2x4 Loop Experimental Findings on the Effect of Inertial and Buoyancy forces on Annular Flow Mixing for Rapid Boron Dilution Transients. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, USA, 2001
  11. T. Hohne, U. Bieder, H.-M. Prasser, S. Kliem. Validation of Trio_U – Numerical Simulations of a ROCOM Buoyancy Driven Test Case. 12th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Washington D.C., USA, April 25-29, Book of Abstracts, S. 278, 2004
  12. H.-M. Prasser, A. Bottger, J. Zschau. A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas-liquid flows. Flow Measurement and Instru-mentation 9. pp. 111-119, 2001
  13. ANSYS CFX.-10 User Manual, ANSYS-CFX, 2005
  14. F. Menter. CFD Best Practice Guidelines for CFD Code Validation for Reactor Safety Applications. ECORA FIKSCT- 2001-00154, 2002
  15. Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J., Rodi, W. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68 (3), 537-566, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112075001814
  16. B. Hemstrom et al. Validation of CFD codes based on mixing experiments (Final report on WP4), EU/FP5 FLOMIX-R report, FLOMIX-R-D11. Vattenfall Utveckling (Sweden), 2005
  17. Rohde, U.; Kliem, S.; Hohne, T.; Karlsson, R.; Hemstrom, B.; Lillington, J.; Toppila, T.; Elter, J.; Bezrukov, Y. Fluid mixing and flow distribution in the reactor circuit - Part 1: Measurement data base. Nuclear Engineering and Design 235, 421-443, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.08.045

Cited by

  1. Experimental and Numerical Investigations on Heat Transfer of Reactor Internals Under Direct Injection vol.190, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1417345