Development of a Design Ontology and Design Process Visualization Environment for the Analysis and Leaning of Conceptual Design

개념 설계과정의 설계정보가시화를 위한 온톨로지 개발과 환경구현

  • Published : 2007.08.31

Abstract

A prototype design process visualization and guidance system, is being developed. Its purpose is to visualize the design process in more intuitive manner so that one can get an insight to the complicated aspects of the design process. By providing a tangible utility to the design process performed by the expert designers or guided by the system, novice designers will be greatly helped to learn how to approach a certain class of design. Not only as an analysis tool to represent the characteristics of the design process, the system will be useful also for learning design process. A design ontology is being developed to provide the system with a knowledge-base, representing designer's activities associated with various design information during the conceptual design process, and then to be utilized for a computer environment for design analysis and guidance. To develop the design ontology, a conceptual framework of design activity model is proposed, and then the model has been tested and elaborated through investigating the nature of the early conceptual design. A design process representation model is conceptualized based on the ontology, and reflected into the development of the system. This paper presents the development process of the visualization system, modeling of design process ontology, and how the system could be utilized for the analysis and learning of conceptual design methods using computer mediated design support environment.

References

  1. 김성아, 설계프로세스의 정보 가시화를 위한 프로세스 분석과 모델링, 대한건축학회논문집 22권 9호, 2006.6
  2. 김홍용.손명기, 국내 건축설계프로세스의 합리화방안, 대한건축학회지 2002년 9월, 2002
  3. Akin, O. How do architects design? in J.C. Latombe (ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer Aided Design, North Holland, New York., 1978
  4. Atman, C.J. and Bursic, K.M. Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes, Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88 no. 2, 1998
  5. The American Institute of Architects, The American Institute of Architects' Document B163 - Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect for Designated Services, AIA, 1993
  6. Carroll, J.M., Sherman R. A., Karat, J, Van Deusen, M., and Rosson, M.B., 'Raison d'Etre: Capturing Design History and rationale in Multimedia Narratives,' CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, Boston, MA, 1994
  7. Chen, A., McGinnis, B. and Ullman, D.G. 'Design History Knowledge Representation and its Basic Computer Implementation,' 2nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology DTM'90, Chicago, IL, New York, NY, 1990
  8. Conklin, E.J. and Begeman, M.L. 'gIBIS: A tool for all reasons,' in Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 40, 1989
  9. Cross, N., Christiaans, H. and Dorst, K.(eds.) Analysing design activity, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1996
  10. Department of Housing Smart Housing: The Research House Design Decision Making Process, Queensland Government, 2004
  11. Dorst, K. and Dijkhuis, J. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity, Design Studies vol.16, 1995
  12. Duerk, D.P. Architectural Programming: Information Management of Design, Wiley, 1993
  13. Eastman, C.M. Representation of Design Process, Invited keynote Speech in Conf. on Design Thinking, MIT, Cambridge, Apr. 23-25, 1999
  14. Gero, J.S. and McNeil, T. An Approach to the Analysis of Design Protocols, Design Studies, vol.19, no.1, 1998
  15. Eastman, C.M., Hsi, I., and Potts, C., A Study of a Large Shanghai Architectural Project, GVU Report, College of Computing, Georgia Inst. of Tech., Atlanta, 1998
  16. Lawson, B. How Designer Think(3rd edition), Architectural Press, 1997
  17. McCall, R.J. 'PHI: A conceptual foundation for design hypermedia,' Design Studies, vol. 12, 1991
  18. Oxman, R. Computational Support for Visual Thinking in Design Ideation, Information Visualization Conference(IV'98) IEEE, Computer Society Press, London, 1998
  19. Oxman, R. The Mind in Design, in Eastman et al.(eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, 2001
  20. Sanders, K. The digital architect: a commonsense: guide to using computer technology in design practice, 1st.ed. Wiley, 1996
  21. Schon, D.A. & Wiggins, G. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, vol.13, no.2, 1992
  22. Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis, Design Studies, 18 (4), 1997
  23. Zeisel, J. Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research, Cambridge University Press, 1981