Journal of Biosystems Engineering

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.166-172
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1738-1266(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1862(eISSN)
한국농업기계학회 (Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

계란의 신선도 결정과 영상분석을 이용한 내부품질 측정

Determination of Egg Freshness and Internal Quality Measurement Using Image Analysis

  • Kim, Hyeon-T. (Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University) ;
  • Ko, Han-J. (Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Y. (Institute of Environmental and Industrial Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kato, K. (Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University) ;
  • Kita, Y. (Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University) ;
  • Nishizu, T. (Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Egg quality indices are related with freshness, size of air chamber, loss of weight, and viscosity of the yolk and the protein. However, since the described quality parameters require measured in a destructive way, it is not suitable to inspect the egg quality with complete enumeration. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the potential of image analysis method for evaluation of internal egg quality. Samples of 90 fresh eggs were collected immediately after laying and stored up to 24 days. Five eggs were randomly drawn from each storage condition (packing vs unpacking) at a regular interval and loss of weight, specific gravity and size of air chamber were measured. The image analysis for nondestructive measurement of size of air chamber was also studied. Results showed that the egg weight and gravity gradually decreased with increasing of storage days, while the size of air chamber linear increased caused by evaporation of water through the shell. A relationship a between conventional method and the image analysis method for measuring the size of air chamber was developed with the correlation coefficient of 0.928. The new finding implied that image analysis might provide a useful nondestructive tool to assess internal egg quality.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arafa, A. S., R. H. Harms, R. D. Miles, R. B. Christmasand and J. H. Choi. 1982. Quality characteristics of eggs from different strains of hens as related to time of oviposition. Poult. Sci. 61(5):842-847 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610842
  2. Baker, R. C. and D. V. Vadehra. 1972. Comparison of candling eggs with other methods of determining internal egg quality. Poult. Sci. 51(3):991-994 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0510991
  3. Chang, Y. H. 2000. Prevalence of Salmonella spp in poultry broilers and shell eggs in Korea. J. Food Protect 63:655-658. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.5.655
  4. Cho, H. K. and Y. Kwon. 1995. Detection of surface defects in eggs using computer vision. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 20(4):368-375. (In Korean)
  5. Cho, H. K., W. K. Choi and J. H. Paek. 1998. Crack detection in eggshell by acoustic responses. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 23(1):67-74. (In Korean)
  6. Choi, W. K., H. K. CHo, J. H. Paek, Y. C. Chang and K. S. Yon. 1999. On-line detection of cracks in eggshell. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 24(3):253-258. (In Korean)
  7. Choi, W. K. and H. K. Cho. 2002. The acoustic vibration properties for chicken eggs. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 27(4):283-300. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2002.27.4.283
  8. Eisen, E. J. and B. B. Bohem. 1963. Some problems in the evaluation of egg albumen quality. Poult. Sci. 42:74-83 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0420074
  9. FAO. 2003. Egg marketing-A guide for the production and sale of eggs. pp. 29-93
  10. Farran, M. T., M. G. Uwayjan, A. M. Miski, F. T. Sleiman, F. A. Adada and V. M. Askikarian. 1995. Effects of the feeding raw and treated common vetch seed on the performance and egg quality parameters of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 74:1630-1635 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741630
  11. Ferreira, L. F. S. and N. L. Del Mastro. 1998. Rheological changes in irradiated chicken eggs. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 52:59-62 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(98)00074-7
  12. Hamilton, R. M. G. 1982. Method and factors that affect the measurement of egg shell quality. Poult. Sci. 57:1192-1197
  13. Hamilton, R. M. G. and B. K. Thompson, 1981. The effects of storage duration on nondestructive deformation, quasi-static compression strength, impact fracture strength, and specific gravity of eggs from white leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 60:517-522 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600517
  14. Kim, S. H., S. J. Lee, D. S. Lee, W. B. Cho, S. H. Lee, S. Borden, Y. A Woo and H. J. Kim. 2005. Non-destructive measurement of the egg freshness by near infrared spectrometry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 49(6):531-536. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2005.49.6.531
  15. Laghi, L., M. A. Cremonini, G. Placucci, S. Sykora, K. Wright and B. Hills. 2005. A proton NMR relaxation study of hen egg quality. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23:501-510 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2004.12.003
  16. Lee, J. 2000. New Salmonella finding-inter-bacterial communication. Agr. Res. 48(1):10-11
  17. Liu, Y., Y. Ying, A. Ouyang, and Y. Li. 2006. Measurement of internal quality in chicken eggs using visible transmittance spectroscopy technology. Food Control 18:18-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.07.011
  18. SAS. 1999. SAS user's guide: Statistics, SAS Inst., Inc., Gary, NC., USA
  19. Silverside, F. G. and P. Villeneuve. 1994. Is the Haugh unit correction for egg weight valid for eggs stored at room temperature. Poult. Sci. 73:50-55 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0730050
  20. Theron, H., P. Venter and J. F. R. Lues. 2003. Bacterial growth on chicken eggs in various storage environments. Food Res. Int. 36:969-975 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(03)00117-0
  21. USDA. 1995. Egg and Poultry Production. Agricultural Marketing Service. Washington D.C
  22. Wang, H. and M. K. Slavik. 1998. Bacterial penetration into eggs washed with various chemicals and stored at different temperatures and times. J. Food Protect. 61:276-279 https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-61.3.276
  23. We, G., Z. Liu, M. Bryant and D. A. Roland. 2005. Performance comparison and nutritional requirements of five commercial layer strains in phase IV. Int. J. Poultry Sci. 4:182-186 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2005.182.186
  24. Williams, K. C. 1992. Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World's Poultry Sci. J. 48:5-16 https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19920002
  25. 峯本 眞知子, 井戶 明美. 1999. 卵の貯藏による品質の變化. 靑葉學園短期大學紀要 24:73-81
  26. 田名部 尙子. 1981. タマゴの利用學. 鷄の硏究 56(1):64-68

피인용 문헌

  1. Choosing quality indicators for quality prediction of egg in circulation vol.21, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2014.21.5.609
  2. Quality Factors Affecting Egg Freshness and Palatability During Storage vol.46, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.3.295
  3. Effects of Storage Time and Temperature on the Hygienic Quality of Shell Eggs vol.41, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5668/JEHS.2015.41.6.438