Estimation of Effective Population Size in a Clonal Seed Orchard of Chamaecyparis obtusa

  • Kang, K.S. (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Son, S.G (Warm-Temperature Forest Research Center, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, C.S. (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • Received : 2007.04.30
  • Accepted : 2007.06.20
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

Clonal differences in fertility (expressed as the number of female and male strobili) were determined for five consecutive years (2002-2006) in a clonal seed orchard of Chamaecyparis obtusa. Fertility varied among clones and among years with producing five-year averages of 378.8 and 871.2 for female and male strobili per ramet, respectively. Correlation between female and male strobilus production was positive over the five years and statistically significant. Based on the observed fertility variation, the effective population sizes (estimated by status numbers, $N_e$) were calculated and varied from 24.3 to 47.9 (48.6% to 95.8% of census number, N) among the five studied years. On average (pooled), the relative effective population size was 82% of the N. Variation in female fertility was higher than that in male fertility, and this variation was reflected on female and male parents' status numbers. Pooled $N_e$ estimated from the five years was higher than that from poor seed production years. From our results, it was concluded that genetic diversity collected from good flowering years would be higher than that from poor flowering years.

Keywords

References

  1. Bilir, N., Kang, K.S., Zhang, D., and Lindgren, D. 2004. Fertility variation and status number between a base population and a seed orchard of Pinus brutia. Silvae Genet. 53: 161-163 https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2004-0029
  2. Burczyk, J. and Chalupka, W. 1997. Flowering and cone production variability and its effect on parental balance in a Scots pine clonal seed orchard. Ann. Sci. For. 54: 129-144 https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19970201
  3. Cockerham, C.C. 1967. Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56: 89-104
  4. El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2000. Effect of forest tree domestication on gene pools. In: Forest Conservation Genetics: Principles and Practice. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (Young, A., D. Boshier and T. Boyle, eds.). CSIRO PublishingCABI Publishing, Canberra, Australia. Chapter 13: 197-213
  5. El-Kassaby, Y.A. and Askew, G.R. 1991. The relation between reproductive phenology and reproductive output in determining the potential gametic pool profile in a Douglas-fir seed orchard. For. Sci. 37: 827-835
  6. El-Kassaby, Y.A. and Barclay, H.J. 1992. Cost of reproduction in Douglas-fir. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1429-1432 https://doi.org/10.1139/b92-179
  7. El-Kassaby, Y.A., Fashler, A.M.K., and Crown, M. 1989. Variation in fruitfulness in a Douglas-fir seed orchard and its effect on crop-management decisions. Silvae Genet. 38: 113-121
  8. Eriksson, G., Jonsson, A., and Lindgren, D. 1973. Flowering in a clone trial of Picea abies Karst. Stud. For. Suec. 110. 45pp
  9. Gomory, D., Bruchanik, R., and Longauer, R. 2003. Fertility variation and flowering asynchrony on Pinus sylvestris: Consequences for the genetic structure of progeny in seed orchards. For. Ecol. Manage. 174: 117-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00031-2
  10. Kang, K.S. and El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2002. Considerations of correlated fertility between genders on genetic diversity: Pinus densiflora seed orchard as a model. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 1183-1189 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1064-4
  11. Kang, K.S. and Lindgren, D. 1999. Fertility variation among clones of Korean pine (pinus koraiensis) and its implications on seed orchard management. For. Genet. 6: 191-200
  12. Kang, K.S., Bila, A.D., Harju, A.M., and Lindgren, D. 2003. Fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry 76: 329-344 https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/76.3.329
  13. Lindgren, D. and Mullin, T.J. 1998. Relatedness and status number in seed orchard crops. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 276-283 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-28-2-276
  14. Linhart, Y.B., Mitton, J.B., Bowman, D.M., Sturgeon, K.B., and Hamrick, J.L. 1979. Genetic aspects of fertility differentials in ponderosa pine. Genet. Res. Camb. 33: 237-242 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300018371
  15. Matziris, D.I. 1993. Variation in cone production in a clonal seed orchard of Black pine. Silvae Genet. 42: 136-141
  16. Nikkanen, T. 2001. Reproductive phenology in a Norway spruce seed orchard. Silvae Fenn. 35: 39-53
  17. Nikkanen, T. and Ruosalainen, S. 2000. Variation in flowering abundance and its impact on the genetic diversity of grafts of Pinus sylvestris. For. Ecol. Manage. 19: 35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(87)90009-0
  18. Reynolds, S. and EI-Kassaby, Y.A. 1990. Parental balance in Douglas-fir seed orchards-cone crop vs. seed crop. Silvae Genet. 39: 40-42
  19. Seido, K., Maeda, H., and Shiraishi, S. 2000a. Determination of the selfing rate in a hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) seed orchard by using a chloroplast PCR-SSCP marker. Silvae Gene. 49: 165-168
  20. Seido K., Maeda H, Murakami H, Ida K., and Shiraishi, S. 2000b. Contribution of clones as the pollen parent in a hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) seed orchard estimated using a chloroplast DNA marker. J. Japanese For. Soc. 82: 105-108
  21. Shiraishi, S., Maeda, H., Toda, T., Seido, K., and Sasaki, Y. 2001. Incomplete paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA recognized in Chamaecyparis obtusa using an intraspecific polymorphism of the trnD-trnY intergenic spacer region. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 935-941 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-001-0554-0
  22. Xie, C.Y. and Knowles, P. 1994. Mating system and effective pollen immigration in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) plantation. Silvae Genet. 43: 48-52
  23. Yamashita, T., Kasuya, N., Nishimura, S., and Takeda, H. 2004. Comparison of two coniferous plantations in central Japan with respect to forest productivity, growth phenology and soil nitrogen dynamics. For. Ecol. Manage. 200: 215-226 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.022
  24. Ying, C.C., Murphy, J.C. and Andersen, S. 1985: Cone production and seed yield of lodgepole pine grafts. For. Chron. 61: 223-228 https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc61223-3