발전주의와 신자유주의를 넘어: 한국 지리학의 발전과정과 대안적 전망

Beyond Developmentalism and Neoliberalism: Development Process and Alternative Visions for Korean Geography

  • 최병두 (대구대학교 지리교육과)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.30

초록

이 논문은 한국의 사회공간적 전환을 배경으로 한국 지리학의 발전과정을 고찰하고, 대안적 전망을 간략히 제시하기 위한 것이다. 지리학을 포함하여 지식의 발전은 주어진 기간에서 사회적 기능과 구조의 규정력 하에서 형성되며, 이렇게 형성된 지식은 다시 사회의 발전에 힘을 제공한다. 한국에서 근대 지리학은 두 단계, 즉 발전주의와 신자유주의 기간으로 구분될 수 있는 한국사회의 자본주의 발전을 배경으로 발전해 왔다. 한국지리학은 발전주의와 신자유주의의 이데올로기의 영향 하에서 발전해 왔으며, 사회공간적 정책들에 기여를 했다. 발전주의 하에서 한국 지리학은 양적으로 팽창했으며, 단순 서술에서 체계적 설명의 틀을 갖추게 되었지만, 실증주의의 한계를 벗어나지 못했다. 신자유주의 하에서 한국 지리학은 질적으로 발전한 부분도 있지만, 사회공간적 정책들에 거의 영향을 미치지 못했고, 신자유주의적 정책으로 인해 유발된 문제들에 대한 비판과 대안을 제시하지도 못했다. 앞으로 한국지리학은 발전주의와 신자유주의를 넘어서야 하며, 사회공간적 복지, 시민사회 또는 공동체, 환경정의 등을 핵심주제로 다루어야할 것이라고 제안된다.

This paper is to consider the developmental process of Korean geography on the context of socio-spatial transformations of Korea, and then to suggest briefly its alternative visions. The development of knowledge including geography seems to be made under imperatives of social functions and structure in a given period, and knowledge in turn gives power for a further development of society. Modem geography in Korea has progressed on the context of capitalist development of Korean society which can be divided into two phases, that is, the period of developmentalism and that of neoliberalism. Korean geography has been developed under influence of ideologies of developmentalism and neoliberalism, and in turn has made some contributions to socio-spatial policies. Korean geography in the future, it can be suggested, should go beyond both developmentalism and neoliberalism, and put socio-spatial welfare, civil society or community, and environmental justice into its central issues.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (eds.), 2002, Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, Oxford
  2. Chang, H.-J., 1999, The economic theory of the developmental state, in Woo-Cumings, M. (ed.), The Developmental State, Cornell University Press, Ithaca
  3. Choi, B.-D., 1996, Development process and prospect of social and population geography in Korea, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 31(2), 268-294 (in Korean)
  4. Choi, B.-D., 2007, Shift from developmentalism to neoliberalism and changes in urban spatial policy in S. Korea, Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 12(1), 82- 103 (in Korean)
  5. Douglass, M., 2000, Turning points in the Korean spaceeconomy: From the Developmental state to intercity competition, Asia-Pacific Research Center, Standford Institute for International Studies, Working Paper (http://aparc.stanford.edu/publications/10042/)
  6. Dumenil, G. and Levy, D., 2005, The nature and contradictions of neoliberalism (http://wwww.jourdan,ens.fr/levy/)
  7. Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge
  8. Gregory, D., 1978, Ideology, Science and Human Geography, Hutchinson, London
  9. Gregory, D., 1994, Geographical Imaginations, Blackwell, Oxford
  10. Habermas, J., 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action, vol.1: Reason and Rationalisation of Society, Polity, Cambridge
  11. Hart-Landsberg, M. and Burkett, P., 2001, Economic crisis and restructuring in South Korea: Beyond the free market-statist debate, Critical Studies, 33(3), 403-430 https://doi.org/10.1080/14672710122698
  12. Harvey, D., 1973, Social Justice and the City, Arnold, London
  13. Harvey, D., 2005, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  14. Jessop, B., 2002, Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective, in Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (eds.), Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, Oxford
  15. Johnson, C., 1982, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: the Growth of Industrial Policy, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
  16. Kim, I., 1986, Contemporary Human Geography: Man and Spatial organization, Beobmunsa, Seoul (in Korean)
  17. Kim, W.-B., 1999, Developmentalism and beyond: reflections on Korean cities, Korea Journal, 39(3), 5-34
  18. Kim, Y.-S., 2001, Faculty appointment and its social structure in departments of geography at Korean universities: 1946-2001, The Geographical Journal of Korea, 35(4), 297-308 (in Korean)
  19. Lee, K.-S., 1983, On geographical research and conception, in Tasks and Approach Methods of Geography (The Commemoration edition for the 60th Birthday Anniversary of Professor Seokcheon Lee, Chan), Kyohaksa, Seoul (in Korean)
  20. Nam, Y.-W., 1996, Prospects and retrospects to the urban geography studies in Korea, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 31(2), 198-212 (in Korean)
  21. Park, S.-O., 1996, Fifty years of economic geography in Korea: Research trends and issues, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 31(2), 160-190 (in Korean)
  22. Park, S.-O. (ed.), 2004, Exploring Geography in the Konwledge-Based Information Society, 2nd Edition, Hanul, Seoul
  23. Park, S.-O., 2006, New economic spaces and directions of geographical research in the knowledgebased information society, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 41(6), 639-656 (in Korea)
  24. Peck, J. and Tickell, A., 2002, Neoliberalizing Space, in Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (eds.), Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, Oxford
  25. Peck, J., 2004, Geography and public policy: constructions of neoliberalism, Progress in Human Geography, 28(3), 392-405 https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph492pr
  26. Strabo, 1917, The Geography of Strabo, Heinemann, London
  27. Tabb, W., 2003, After neoliberalism?, Monthly Review, 55(2), 25-33 https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-055-02-2003-06_3
  28. Wallerstein, I., 2005, After developmentalism and globalization, what?, Social Forces, 83(3), 1263- 1278 https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0049
  29. Yang, J.-J., 2005, Developmentalism after development: the growth, crisis, and future of the Korean developmental state, Korean Review of Public Administration, 39(1), 1-18 (in Korean)
  30. Yeung, H. W.-C., 2000, State intervention and neoliberalism in the globalizing world economy: lessons from Singapore's regionalization programme, The Pacific Review, 13(1), 133-162 https://doi.org/10.1080/095127400363677