Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems (제어로봇시스템학회논문지)

Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems (제어로봇시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison between True Proportional Navigation Guidance Law and Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law

단거리 지대공 유도무기에서의 순비례항법 유도법칙과 진비례항법 유도법칙의 성능비교

  • 유의환 (군산대학교 전자정보공학부) ;
  • 전칠환 (군산대학교 전자정보공학부) ;
  • 이연석 (군산대학교 전자정보공학부)
  • Published : 2007.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a performance comparison between traditional TPN (true proportional navigation) guidance law and PPN(pure proportional navigation) guidance law is made, based on a short range surface-to-air missile simulation program. This simulation program has a nonlinear aerodynamic missile model, a roll stabilized autopilot, a nonlinear radar model, and a target model, According to the simulation results, the PPN guidance law has better performances than TPN guidance law under the condition of evasive target.

Keywords

References

  1. G. M. Siouris, 'Comparison between proportional and augmented proportional navigation,' Nachrichtentechnische Zeitschrift, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 278-280, July 1974
  2. C. D. Yang, F. B. Yeh, and J. H. Chen, 'Generalized guidance law of homing missiles,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 197-211, Mar., 1989 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.18681
  3. G. M. Siouris, Missile Guidance and Control System, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 2004
  4. J. H. Blakelock, Automatic control of Aircraft and Missiles, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, second edition. 1991
  5. P. Garnell, Guided Weapon Control Systems Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, second edition, 1980
  6. G. T. Lee and J. G. Lee, 'Improved command to line-of-sight for homing guidance,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 506-510, Jan., 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.366337
  7. V. Garber, 'Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets,' AIAA Journal, vol, 6, no. 11, Nov., 1968 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4962
  8. K. Becker, 'Close-form solution of pure proportional navigation,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 526-533, May 1990 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.106131
  9. R. R. Kumar, H. Seywald, E. M. Cliff, and H. T. Kelley, 'Three-dimensional air-to-air missile trajectory shaping,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 449-464, May-June 1995 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21408
  10. B. S. Kim, J. G. Lee, and H. S Han, 'Biased PNG law impact with angular constraint,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34, no. 1, pp 277-288, Jan., 1998 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.640285
  11. T. Feng, 'An unified approach to missile guidance laws: A 3D extension,' IEEE Proceedings of American Control Conference Anchorage, AK, May 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2002.1023270
  12. J. W. Wang and X. S. Xie, 'A derivation of pure proportional navigation,' IEEE Proceedings of the American Control Conference San Diego, California, June 1999 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.1999.786206
  13. E. Duflos, P. Penel, and P. Vanheeghe, '3D guidance law modeling,' IEEE Log No. T-AES/35/1/01490, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.745681
  14. S. K. Rao, 'Comments on 'Optimal guidance of proportional navigation,' IEEE Log no. T-AES/34/3/06033, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.705907
  15. E. Duflos, P. Penel, and P. Vanheeghe, 'Considerations about Pure Proportional Navigation,' IEEE 0-7803-2129-4/94, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1994.400255
  16. E. Duflos, P. Penel, and P. Vanheeghe, 'General 3D guidance law modeling,' IEEE 0-7803-2559-1/95 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1995.538074
  17. G. M. Siouris, An Engineering Approach to Optimal Control and Estimation Theory, John Wiley & sons, Inc., New York, 1996
  18. S. A. Murtaugh and H. E. Criel, 'Fundamentals of proportional navigation,' IEEE Spectrum, vol. 3, no. 12. pp. 75-85, Dec., 1966 https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.1966.5217080