대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제45권1호
  • /
  • Pages.21-33
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

4종의 간접법용 복합 레진의 기계적 특성 비교

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES IN 4 INDIRECT COMPOSITE RESIN

  • 김길수 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 윤태호 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 안승근 (전북대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Kim, Kil-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yoon, Tae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ahn, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2007.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem: The esthetic component of dental care has become increasingly more important, while new tooth-colored materials are continually marketed. Various new indirect composite materials have been developed with required advantages. The most recent development in the indirect composites has been the introduction of the second-generation laboratory composite or poly-glass materials. They are processed by different laboratory techniques based on combinations of heat, pressure, vacuum and light polymerization. Although, second generation products became available in 1995, their characteristics and clinical performance have not been adequately investigated. Purpose: The aim of this study was to measure the mechanical properties of the second generation indirect resin system and compare these with an existing universal direct composite resin. Material and method: In this study four indirect composite material (Adoro LC, BelleGlass HP, Tescera, Synfony) were tested for flexural strength, wear resistance, hardness and their degree of conversion against Z250, a light cure direct composite. Results: Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions were drawn: 1. From the abrasion wear result, Adoro showed the least volume loss while Synfony showed the greatest volume loss. Z250 and BelleGlass HP didn't show significant difference (p>0.05), but they showed significant difference with other groups (p<0.05). From the attrition wear, BelleGlass HP showed the least volume loss and it didn’t show significant difference with Tescera (p>0.05). While Synfony showed the greatest volume loss that it showed significant difference with other groups (p>0.05). 2. Mean values of flexural strength by means of three point bending test was in the order of Z250, Adoro, Belleglass HP, Tescera and Synfony. Mean elastic modulus was in the order of Z250, BelleGlass HP, Tescera, Adoro and Synfony. 3. The result of Vicker‘s microhardness value showed that significantly higher value in Z250 (p<0.05), and is in the order of BelleGlass HP, Tescera, Adoro and Synfony. 4. The degree of conversion measured by FT-IR showed significantly higher value in BelleGlass HP (p<0.05), and is in the order of Adoro, Synfony, Tescera and Z250. Conclusion: Significant differences were found in the flexural strength, wear resistance, hardness and their degree of conversion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McLean JW. The science and art of dental ceramics. Oper Dent 1991;16:149-156
  2. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Van Putten M. Two body wear resistance and degree of conversion of laboratory processed composite materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:432-438
  3. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25:459-473 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00066-8
  4. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restouations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108- 118 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  5. O'Brien WJ, Yee JJ. Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resins after clinical Wear. Oper Dent 1980;5:90- 4
  6. Mair LH. Wear in dentistry-current terminology. J Dent 1992;20:140-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(92)90125-V
  7. Venhoven BA, de Gee AJ, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of filler parameters on the mechanical coherence of dental restorative resin composites. Biomaterials 1996;17:735-740 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)86744-5
  8. Draughn RA, Harrison A. Relationship between abrasive wear and microstructure of composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 40:220-224
  9. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A comparison of the wear resistance and harkness of indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:386-395 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114267
  10. Demirel F, Saygili G, Sahmali S. Comparative mechanical property characterization of three indirect composite resin materials compared with two direct composites. Polym Adv Technol 2003;14:380-386 https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.344
  11. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Siliksa N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratoryprocessed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:393-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-9
  12. McCabe JF. Applied dental materials. 7th ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1990. p. 78-86
  13. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p. 248-270
  14. Harrison A, Draughn RA. Abrasive wear, tensile strength, and hardness of dental composite resins-is there a relationship. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:395-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90160-8
  15. Lappalainen R, Yli-Urpo A, Seppa L. Wear of dental restorative and prosthetic materials in vitro. Dent Mater 1989;5:35- 37 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90090-0
  16. Kawai K, Iwami Y, Ebisu S. Effect of resin monomer composition on toothbrush wear resistance. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25:264-268 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00246.x
  17. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their merphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310-319 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90106-M
  18. Carreiro FP, Cruz DS, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: ettects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1085-1089 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01147.x
  19. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites : properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290- 295 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90102-I
  20. Ruyter IE, Oysaed H. Conversion in different depths of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite meterials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:179-192 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358209012726
  21. Soares CJ, Pizi ECG, Fonseca RB, Martins LRM. Mechanical properties of light-cured composites polymerized with several ad-ditional post-curing methods. Oper Dent 2005;30:389-394
  22. Brosh T, Ferstand N, Cardash H, Baharav H. Effect of polymerization under pressure on indirect tensile mechanical properties of light-polymerized composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:381-387 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128100
  23. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-131 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200111
  24. Ruyter IE, Oysaed H. Compressive creep of light-cured resin based restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:319- 324 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358209024076
  25. Wendt SL Jr. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins II. Wear, hardness and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:351-356
  26. McCabe JF, Kagi S. Mechanical properties of a composite inlay material following postcuring. Br Dent J 1991;171:246-248 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807685
  27. Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Stephens NH. Effects of secondary curing on indirect posterior composite resins. Oper Dent 1994;19:217-220
  28. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC, Condon JR, Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 1997;76:1508-1516 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760081401
  29. Chung KH, Greener EH. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:487-494 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01419.x
  30. Jordan RE. Esthetic composite bonding: techniques and materials. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1993. p. 23-33