대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제45권3호
  • /
  • Pages.389-400
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

ACCURACY OF THE IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE USING THERMOFORMING POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE TRAY

  • Miyashita, Yuko (Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Suzuki, Hiroki (Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Kishi, Masataka (Department of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Ko, Sok-Min (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
  • 발행 : 2007.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Use of the conventional dental impression procedure is problematic in patients who have difficulty opening their mouth, difficulty breathing through their nose or tendency to gag. Purpose. It is necessary to make individual trays more comfortable for patients during impression taking procedure. It was reported at the KAP Annual Meeting 2001 Seoul that an improved impression technique was suitable for this purpose. In this study, the accuracy of the improved dental impression method for implant was compared with the conventional dental impression method. Material and methods. An oral simulator was made from clear acrylic resin block which had similar form of edentulous ridge. For setting up the standard, five fixtures were installed on it. Study casts were made using two kinds of impression techniques. One was the conventional method that was taken using silicone impression material and an individual resin tray under connection of inter-fixture relation. The other was the improved method in which was the connection of the impression coping and the thermoformed polymethyl methacrylate tray. In addition, two different study casts were made from the improved impression body. The coordinates of the fixture on the study model were measured by three-dimensional coordinate measuring equipment. Then the distances between each fixture were calculated and compared with that of oral simulator. Accuracy of the each impression method was also assessed. Results. The differences of inter-fixture dimension between study casts and simulator in the improved impression technique showed $0.014{\pm}0.016mm$ and $0.017{\pm}0.022mm$, respectively and that of the conventional method was $0.017{\pm}0.014mm$. There was no significant difference between the improved impression technique and conventional method. Conclusion. The improved impression technique is useful for multiple support implants.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Zarb GA, Jansson T. Prosthodontic procedures, in Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors: Tissue integrated prostheses, osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence 1985:241-282
  2. Suzuki H, Arataki T, Akahori Y, Miyashita Y, Hotta H, Adachi Y. A development of the immediate impression technique for multiple support implants. KAP annual meeting 2001 Seoul
  3. Jagger RG, Okdeh A. Thermoforming polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:542-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80359-2
  4. Jagger RG. Dimensional accuracy of thermoformed polymethyl methacrylate. 1996;76:573-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90431-X
  5. Mojon P, et al. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:686-68
  6. Rignon-Bret C, Dupuis R, Gaudy J-F. Application of a 3-dimensional measurement system to complete denture impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:603-612 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124204
  7. Choi HD, Kwon KR, Kim HB, Choi DG. Dimensional change and flexural strength in complete dentures fabricated by injection molding and conventional compression processing. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:478-486
  8. Kim Y, Yang H. Effect of impression technique on the accuracy of master cast for implant prosthesis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 200442:238-247
  9. Misch CE. Natural teeth adjacent to multiple implant sites: Effect on diagnosis and treatment plan. Dental implant prosthetics Mosby 2005:180- 195
  10. Sekine H, Komiyama Y, Hotta et al. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixture-supporting system. In van Steenberghe D, editor: Tissue integration in oral maxillofacial reconstruction, Amsterdam, 1986, Elsevier
  11. Guichet DL, Caputo AA, H Choi, Sorensen JA. Passivity of fit and marginal opening in screw- or cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:239-246
  12. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90084-X
  13. Lee HS, Cho SK, Yoon TH, Park KM, Song KY. An evaluation of the time-dependent dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials. Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:363-373
  14. Donovan TE, Chee WL. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin N Am 2004;48:445-470 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.014
  15. Scheu Dental GmbH. Product data sheet-Pressure molding foils. 2006
  16. Turk MD, Lang BR, Wilcox DE, Meirs JC. Direct measurement of dimensional accuracy with three denture processing techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1992;4:367-372
  17. Carr AB. A comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455
  18. Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: a three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:533-540