The Influence of Control and Friendliness-Perception of Apparel Brand on the Consumption Behavior

의류브랜드의 친애와 통제 지각이 소비행동에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Ji-Ryang (Strategic Panning Team, Leo Burnett Korea) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Ae (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 이지량 (레오버넷 코리아 전락기획팀) ;
  • 김주애 (경상대학교 의류학전공)
  • Received : 2007.06.08
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

This study aims to examine what consumers perceive about affection and control in association with personified brands, and to explore what effects such perception has on consumer behavior. The research methodology employed a questionnaire surveying female university students in the Seoul. The data were analyzed by SPSS Hangul 10.0 Statistic Package. 16 apparel brands that had been selected by a preliminary study were surveyed. The data analysis method employed a factor analysis, analysis of variance, and multiple regression analysis. The study found that consumers' perception of personified brands is divided into Friendliness and control like in interpersonal communication, and consumers' preference and purchase intention becomes different depending on affection and control perception. In particular, it was analyzed that more important factor that decides preference and purchase intention is the perception in the aspect of control, not in the aspect of Friendliness.

Keywords

References

  1. 김유경 (2000) 브랜드 개성의 유형과 영향요인에 관한 연구: 제품특성과 소비자 요인을 중심으로. 광고연구, 49(12), 29-53
  2. 성영신.박은아.김유나 (2003) 국내 및 해외브랜드의 브랜드성격이 구매행동에 미치는 영향. 제품 관여도와 자기존중감의 조절 효과를 중심으로. 광고학연구, 14(4), 257-28
  3. 손관호.김광석.최이규 (2003) 브랜드개성과 소비자 태도의 관련성 연구. 경영교육논총, 30, 385-408
  4. 양윤.조은하 (2002) 한국형 브랜드 성격 척도 개발과 타당화에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자 광고심리, 3(2), 25-53
  5. 이학식.임지훈 (2004) 브랜드 카리스마, 형성요인, 그리고 효과: 상징적/기능적 관여도의 조정적 작용. 마케팅연구, 19(3), 137-177
  6. 이학식.최재익, 임지훈 (2004) 소비자 구매 행동에 대한 브랜드의 태도: 소비자-브랜드 관계에서의 역할, 소비자학연구, 15(2), 85-108
  7. 정남운 (2004) 대인관계 원형모델에 따른 한국판 대인싼계 형용사척도의 구성. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 16(1), 37-51
  8. Belk, R. (1988) Possessions and extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(September), 139-169 https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
  9. Carson, R.C. (1969) 'Interaction Concept of Personality'. Aldine, Chicago.
  10. Forgas. J.P. (1978) The effects of behavioural and cultural expectation cues on the perception of social episodes. European Journal of Social Psychology 8, 203-213 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080206
  11. Foumier, S. (1998) Consumer and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Maketing Research, 24(March), 343-373
  12. Hong, J.W. and Zinkhan, G.M. (1995) Self-concept and dvertising effectiveness: The influence of congmency, conspicuousness, and response mode. Psychology & Marketing, 12, 53-77 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120105
  13. Leary. T.F. (1957) 'Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality'. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
  14. Soygut and Avasir (2001) The relationship between interpersonal schemas and depressive symptomatology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 359-364 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.3.359
  15. Smothers, N. (1993) 'Can Product and Brands Have Charisma?' in Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands, ed. David A Aaker and Alexander L. Biel, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 97-111
  16. Smll, K. and Wyer, R. (1989) Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.1.58
  17. Wiggins J.S. (1979) A psychological taxonomy if trait-descliptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 295-412
  18. Zeithaml, V., Leonard, L.B. and Parasuraman A. (1996) The Behavioral Consequence of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(April), 31-46