Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

A Retrospective study of the type of patients, the distribution of implant and the survival rate of $Xive^{(R)}$ implant

($Xive^{(R)}$)임플란트 식립시 환자 유형 및 식립부 분포와 생존율에 대한 후향적 연구

  • Myung, Woo-Chun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 명우천 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 이중석 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채경준 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소)
  • Published : 2007.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is an analysis of types of patients and distribution of implant site and survival rate of $Xive^{(R)}$ implant. The following results on patient type, implant distribution and survival rate were compiled from 324 implant cases of 140 patients treated at the periodontal dept. of Yonsei University Hospital and G dental clinic between February 2003 and April 2006. 1. There are no dissimilarities between men and women, with patients in their 30, 40, 50s accounting for 80% of patients and accounted for 82% of implant treatments; the largest share of patients and implant treatments. 2. Mn, posterior area. accounted for 57% of implant treatments followed by Mx. posterior area(29%), Mx, anterior area(8%) and Mn, anterior area(6%). 3. Partial edentulous patients treated by single crown and bridge-type prosthesis accounted for 96% and fully edentulous patient accounted for the remaining 4%. 4. The major cause of tooth loss is periodontal disease, followed by dental canes, trauma and congenital missing. 5, The distribution of bone quality for maxillae was 54,2% for type III, followed by 30.8% for type II, 15% for type IV and 0% for type I. As for mandible, the distribution was 63% for type II, followed by 34% for type III, 2,5% for type I and 0,5% for type IV. 6. The distribution of bone quantity for maxillae was 55% for type C, followed by 35% for type B, 8% for type D and 2% for type A. As for mandible, the distribution was 60% for type B, followed by 32% for type C, 7% for type A and 0% for type D. 7. The majority of implants were those of 9.5-13 mm in length(95%) and regular diameter in width(82%). 8. The total survival rate was 98%. The survival rate was 97% in the maxillae region and 99% in the mandible region. 9. The survival rate in type I was 83%, in type II was 99%, in type III was 97% and in type IV was 100%. As for the bone quantity, the survival rate in type A and D(100%) was most, followed by type B(99%) and type C(96%). The results showed that $Xive^{(R)}$ implant could be used satisfactorily compare for the other implant system. But we most to approach carefully in certain extreme condition especially with poor bone quality and quantity.

Keywords

References

  1. 박지은, 윤정호, 정의원 등. 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34:819-836
  2. 채경준, 정의원, 김창성 등. 상악에 식립된 Frialit-2 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35:449-459
  3. 장인권, 정의원, 김창성 등. 하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35:437-448
  4. Branemark PI, Brein U, Adell R, Hansson B, -O, Ohlsson A, Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses, I, Experimental studies. Scandinavian Jounal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1969;3:81-100 https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  5. Branemark PI, Brein U, Johansson B. et al, Regeneration of bone marrow. A clinical and experimental study following removal of bone marrow by curettage, Acta. Anat 1964;59: 1-46 https://doi.org/10.1159/000142601
  6. Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Imediato functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants, An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study, clin, oral Impl, res 2000:110:26-33
  7. Henny PH, Laney W,R. Jemt T, Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a prospective 5 years multicenter study. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1996; 11: 450-455
  8. Schnitman, Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis implant placement, Int .J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495-503
  9. Atwood DA, Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by micro-radiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms, J pros-thet Dent 1963;13:810-824 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(63)90225-7
  10. Lekholm U, Zarb G, Branemark PI, Tissue integrated prostheses Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago. Quintensence 1985;199-209
  11. Stephen W, Use of the Frialit-2 Implant system in Private Practice: A Clinical report, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 4:552-555
  12. Gomez-Roman G, Kruppenbacher M, Weber H, Schulte W. immediate Postextraction Implant Placement with Root-Analog Stepped Implants: surgical procedure and Statistical outcome After 6 Years, Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2001:4:503-513
  13. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005:20:99-107
  14. Degidi M. Piattelli A. Parallel Screw Cylinder Implants: Comparative Analysis Between Immediate Loading and Two-Stage Healing of 1005 Dental Implants with a 2-Year Follow Up. Clinical Implant dentistry and Related Research, 2006:8: 151-160 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00007.x
  15. 홍성재, 백정원, 김창성 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002: 32: 539-554
  16. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, at al Survival of the Branemark Implant in Partially Edentulous Jaws:A 10-Year Prospective Multicenter Study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999:14:639-645
  17. D, Buser, U Brugger, N.D.Lang, S. Nyman, Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration, Clin Oral Impl Res 1990;1:22-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010104.x
  18. 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상. 하악대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임플란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002:32:577-587
  19. Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Branemark fixture intergration and shortterm survival using one-stage or twostage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandible S, Clin oral Impl Res 1998;9:131 -135 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090209.x
  20. 이항빈, 백정원, 김창성 등. 하악 제 1,2 대구치를 대체하는 단일 임플란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34: 101-111