Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The effect of early membrane exposure on exophytic bone formation using perforated titanium membrane

천공형 티타늄 막의 조기 노출이 수직 골 형성에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Eun-Jung (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Chung, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 김은정 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 박준봉 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소) ;
  • 정종혁 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생물학연구소)
  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the effect of membrane exposure on new bone formation when guided bone regeneration with perforated titanium membrane on atrophic alveolar ridge. The present study attempted to establish a GBR model for four adult beagle dog premolar. Intra-marrow penetration defects were created on the alveolar ridge(twelve weeks after extraction) on the mandibular premolar teeth in the beagle dogs. Space providing perforated titanium membrane with various graft material were implanted to provide for GBR. The graft material were demineralized bovine bone(DBB), Irradiated cancellous bone(ICB) and demineralized human bone powder(DFDB). The gingival flap were advanced to cover the membranes and sutured. Seven sites experienced wound failure within 2-3weeks postsurgery resulting in membrane exposure. The animals were euthanized at 4 weeks postsurgery for histologic and histometric analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1. There was little new bone formation at 4 weeks postsurgery. irrespectively of membrane exposure. 2. There was significant relationship between membrane exposure and bone graft resorption(P<0.05), but no relation between membrane exposure and infiltrated connective tissue. 3. There was much bone graft resorption on DFDB than ICB and DBB. 4. The less exposure was on the perforated titanium membrane, the more dense infiltrated connective tissue was filled under the membrane when grafted with ICB and DBB. but there was no relationship between the rate of membrane exposure and the percentage of infiltrated connective tissue area and no relationship between the percentage of the area in the infiltrated connective tissue and in the residual bone graft. Within the above results, bone formation may be inhibited when membrane was exposed and ICB and DBB were more effective than DFDB as a bone graft material when guided bone regeneration.

Keywords

References

  1. Marco D, Antonio S, Adriano P. Regeneration of the alveolar crest using titanium micromesh with autologous bone and a resorbable membrane. J of Oral Implantology 2003;2:86-90
  2. Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:19-25
  3. Buser D, Dura K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration: Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1993;13:29-45
  4. Scantlebury TV. A decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1129-1137 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1129
  5. Ofter M, Sandu P, Zvi A. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: A comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2005;16:210-219 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01100.x
  6. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-852
  7. Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehiscenced defect sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:233-245
  8. Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jaw bone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:462-473
  9. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1989;9:333-343
  10. Martin L, Christof P, Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes: A retrospective follow-up study up to five years. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:274-280 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
  11. Carlo T, Stefano PB. Treatment of peri-implant defects with the vertical ridge augmentation procedure: A patient report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:572-577
  12. Schenk RK. Bone regeneration: Biologic bias. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 49-100
  13. Malchiodi N, Scarano A, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Rigid fixation by means of titanium mesh in edentulous ridge expansion for horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:701-705
  14. Perikls P, Jaime L, Alejandro K. The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23:185-195
  15. Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:87-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90054-0
  16. von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:387-394
  17. von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autogenous bone and a micro titanium mesh: A prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:24-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100104.x
  18. Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanof CJ. Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single tooth implants: Presentation of a surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;26:106-109
  19. von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. Localized ridge augmentation using a micro-titanium mesh: A report on 27 implants followed from 1 to 3 years after functional loading. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:123-130 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090208.x
  20. Augthun M, Yildrium M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S. Healing of bone defects in combination with immediate implants using the membrane technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:421-428
  21. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction socket: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;14:48-61
  22. Gher ME, Quintero G, Assad D, Monaco E. Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 881-891 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.9.881
  23. van Steenberghe D, Johansson C, Quirynen M, Molly L, Albrektsson T. Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier: A study in rabbits and humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:63-71 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140109.x
  24. von Arx T, Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Buser D. Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application: A histologic and histometric pilot study in the mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:260-269 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003260.x
  25. Mattout P, Mattout C. Conditions for success in guided tissue regeneration: Retrospective study on 376 implant site. J Periodontol 2000;71:1904-1909 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.12.1904
  26. Nowzari H, Martin F, Slots J. Periodontal pathogens on polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. J. Clin Periodontol 1995;22:469-474 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00179.x
  27. Nowzari H, Slots J. Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:67-73
  28. Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Chamberlain AD. Regenerative surgery of intrabony periodontal defects using e-PTFE membranes: Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of retrieved membranes vs, clinical healing. J Periodontol 2002;63:974-978 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.12.974
  29. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Polansky RA. Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13: 274-280 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130306.x
  30. Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, Zaffe D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994;14:167-180
  31. Simion M, Tristi P, Piattelli A Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994; 14:167-180
  32. Yoshinari N, Tohya T, Mori A. Inflammatory cell population and bacterial contamination of membranes used for guided tissue regenerative procedure. J Periodontol 1998;69:460-469 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.4.460
  33. Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M, Clauser C. Integrated connective tissue in bioabsorbable barrier membrane and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1997;68: 996-1004 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.996
  34. Kohal RJ, Mellas P, Hurzeler ME, et al, The effect of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction socket: An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 1998;69:927-937 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.8.927
  35. Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: A meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 512-516 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.512
  36. De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of bioabsorbable barrier material and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1996;67:1193-1200 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1996.67.11.1193
  37. De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of barrier material and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1996; 23: 1039-1046 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00534.x
  38. Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Kovacevic K, Carranza FA Jr. Evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in class II furcation defects: A clinical re-entry study. J Periodontol 1989;60:694-698 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.694
  39. Becker W, Becker BE, Berg L, Prichard J. New attachment after treatment with root isolation procedure: Report for treated class II furcation with vertical osseous defects. lnt J Periodont Rest Dent 1988;8: 9-21
  40. Yukna RA. Clinical human comparison of e-PTFE barrier membrane and freeze-dried dura mater allografts for guided tissue regeneration of lost periodontal support I: Mandibular class II furcations. J Periodontol 1992;63:431-442 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1992.63.5.431