Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical and efficient approaches for semi-rigid design of composite frames

  • Gil, Beatriz (Department of Structural Analysis and Design, School of Architecture, University of Navarra) ;
  • Bayo, Eduardo (Department of Structural Analysis and Design, School of Architecture, University of Navarra)
  • Received : 2006.08.14
  • Accepted : 2007.03.12
  • Published : 2007.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The use of composite semi-rigid connections is not fully exploited, in spite of its great number of advantages. Composite semi-rigid connections may lead to an optimal moment distribution that will render lighter structures. Furthermore, using the appropriate semi-rigid connection design, the stability of the frames against lateral loads may entirely rely on the joint stiffness, thus avoiding bracing systems and permitting more diaphanous designs. Although modern codes, such as the Eurocode 4 (EC4), propose thorough methods of analysis they do not provide enough insight and simplicity from the design point of view. The purpose of this paper is to introduce practical and efficient methods of analysis that will facilitate the work of a structural analyst starting from the global analysis of the composite frame and ending on the final connection design. A key aspect is the definition of the stiffness and strength of the connections that will lead to an optimal moment distribution in the composite beams. Two examples are presented in order to clarify the application of the proposed methods and to demonstrate the advantages of the semi-rigid composite design with respect to the alternative pinned and rigid ones. The final aim of the paper is to stimulate and encourage the designer on the use of composite semi-rigid structures.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, B. and Nethercot, D. A. (1997),"Prediction of initial stiffness and available rotation capacity of major axis composite flush endplate connections", J. Constr. Steel Res., 41(1), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(96)00053-3
  2. Amadio, C. and Fragiacomo, M. (2003),"Analysis of rigid and semi-rigid steel-concrete composite joints under monotonic loading. Part II: Parametric study and comparison with the Eurocode 4 proposal", Steel Compos. Struct. 3(5), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2003.3.5.371
  3. Anderson, D. and Najafi, A. A. (1994),"Performance of composite connections: major axis end plate joints", J. Constr. Steel Res., 31(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(94)90022-1
  4. Bayo, E., Cabrero, J. M. and Gil, B. (2006),"An effective component based method to model semi-rigid connections for the global analysis of steel and composite structures", Eng. Struct., 28(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.001
  5. Brown, N. D. and Anderson, D. (2001),"Structural properties of composite major axis end plate connections", J. Constr. Steel Res. 57, 327-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00034-1
  6. Calado, L., Simoes da Silva, L. and Simoes, R. (2000),"Cyclic behavior of steel and composite beam-to-column joints", Connections in Steel Structures IV, Elsevier Science.
  7. CEN (2003), Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1.8: Design of Joints (Pren 1993-1-8:2003), Stage 49 Draft Edition, CEN.
  8. CEN (2003), Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part 1.1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Pren 1994-1-1:2003), CEN.
  9. Chen, W. (2000), Practical Analysis for Semi-Rigid Frame Design. Singapore, World Scientific.
  10. Dissanayake, U. I., Davison, J. B. and Burgess, I. W. (1999),"Composite beam behaviour in braced frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 49(3), 271-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(98)00205-3
  11. Fang, L. X., Chan, S. L. and Wong, Y. L. (1999),"Strength analysis of semi-rigid steel-concrete composite frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 52(3), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00032-2
  12. Hensman, J. S. and Nethercot, D. A. (2001),"Numerical study of unbraced composite frames: generation of data to validate use of the wind moment method of design", J. Constr. Steel Res., 57(7), 791-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00008-6
  13. Kattner, M. and Crisinel, M. (2000),"Finite element modelling of semi-rigid composite joints", Comput. Struc. Pergamon 78(1-3), 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00064-X
  14. Lawson, R. M. and Chung, K. F. (1994), Composite Beam Design to Eurocode 4. The Steel Construction Institute. Ascot UK.
  15. Lawson, R. M. and Gibbons, C. (1995), Moment Connections in Composite Construction: Interim Guidance for End-Plate Connections. The Steel Construction Institute. Ascot UK.
  16. Leon, R. T., Hoffman, J. J. and Staeger, T. (1991), Partially Restrained Composite Connections: A Design Guide. American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago USA.
  17. Liew, J. Y. R., Looi, K. L. and Uy, B. (2001),"Practical design guidelines for semi-continuous composite braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct. 1(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1296/SCS2001.01.02.05
  18. Liew, J. Y. R., Teo, T. and Shanmugam, N. E. (2004),"Composite joints subject to reversal of loading-Part 1: experimental study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 60(2), 221-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.010
  19. Liew, J. Y. R., Teo, T., Shanmugam, N. E. and Yu, C. H. (2000),"Testing of steel-concrete composite connections and appraisal of results", J. Constr. Steel Res., 56(2), 117-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00099-1
  20. Murray, T. M. and Shoemaker, W. L. (2002), Flush and Extended Multiple-Row Moment End-Plate Connections. The American Institute of Steel Construction. Chicago USA.
  21. Nethercot, D. A. and Li, T. (1995), Connection Design and Detailing: Composite Flush End Plate Connection. The Steel Construction Institute. Ascot UK.
  22. Quintero, F. and Cudos, V. (1996), Estructuras Metalicas: Uniones. Fundacion Escuela de la Edificacion. Madrid, Spain.
  23. Rassati, G. A., Leon, R. T. and Noe, S. (2004),"Component modelling of partially restrained composite joints under cyclic and dynamic loading", J. Struct. Eng., 130(2), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(343)
  24. Rassati, G. A., Noe, S. and Leon, R. T. (2000),"Pr composite joints under cyclic and dynamic loading conditions: A component modelling approach", Connections in Steel Structures IV, Roanoke, Elsevier Science.
  25. Ren, P. and Crisinel, M. (1995),"Prediction method for moment-rotation behaviour of composite beam to steel column connection", Connections in Steel Structures III, Trento, Italy, Elsevier Science.
  26. SCI (1998), Joints in Steel Construction: Composite Connections. Steel Construction Institute. British Constructional Steelwork Association Limited. Ascot, London, UK.
  27. Simoes da Silva, L., Girao Coelho, A. and Simoes, R. D. (2001),"Analytical evaluation of the moment-rotation response of beam-to-column composite joints under static loading", Steel Compos. Struct., 1(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1296/SCS2001.01.02.07
  28. Simoes da Silva, L., Simoes, R. D. and Cruz, P. J. S. (2001),"Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-tocolumn composite joints under monotonical loading", Eng. Struct., 23(11), 1383-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00054-2
  29. SSEDTA (2001),"Eurocodes for Composite Structures. Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of a Trans- National Approach", Module 4: Joints.