DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vulnerability model of an Australian high-set house subjected to cyclonic wind loading

  • Henderson, D.J. (Cyclone Testing Station, School of Engineering, James Cook University) ;
  • Ginger, J.D. (Cyclone Testing Station, School of Engineering, James Cook University)
  • Received : 2006.12.12
  • Accepted : 2007.03.22
  • Published : 2007.06.25

Abstract

This paper assesses the damage to high-set rectangular-plan houses with low-pitch gable roofs (built in the 1960 and 70s in the northern parts of Australia) to wind speeds experienced in tropical cyclones. The study estimates the likely failure mode and percentage of failure for a representative proportion of houses with increasing wind speed. Structural reliability concepts are used to determine the levels of damage. The wind load and the component connection strengths are treated as random variables with log-normal distributions. These variables are derived from experiments, structural analysis, damage investigations and experience. This study also incorporates progressive failures and considers the inter-dependency between the structural components in the house, when estimating the types and percentages of the overall failures in the population of these houses. The progressively increasing percentage of houses being subjected to high internal pressures resulting from damage to the envelope is considered. Results from this study also compare favourably with levels of damage and related modes of failure for high-set houses observed in post-cyclone damage surveys.

Keywords

References

  1. Boughton, G. N. and Reardon, G. F. (1984), "Simulated wind load tests on the Tongan hurricane house", Cyclone Testing Station, James Cook University, Report TR23.
  2. Ellingwood, B. R., MacGregor, J. G., Galambos, T. V. and Cornell, C. A. (1982), "Probability based load criteria - load factors and load combinations", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108, 978-997.
  3. Ellingwood, B. R., and Tekie, P. B. (1999), "Wind load statistics for probability-based structural design", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 125, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(453)
  4. Ellingwood B. R., Rosowsky, D. V., Li, Y. and Kim, J. H. (2004), "Fragility assessment of light-frame construction subjected to wind and earthquake hazards", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130, 1921-1930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1921)
  5. Galambos, T. V., Ellingwood, B. R., MacGregor, J. G. and Cornell, C. A. (1982), "Probability based load criteria -assessment of current design practice", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 108, 959-977.
  6. Ginger, J. D. (2000), "Internal pressures and cladding net wind loads on a full-scale low-rise building", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 126, 538-543. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(538)
  7. Henderson, D. J. and Harper, B. A. (2003), "Climate change and tropical cyclone impact on coastal communities' vulnerability", Report to Queensland Government (Dept of Natural Resources and Mines, and Dept of Emergency Services).
  8. Henderson, D. J. and Harper, B. A. (2004), "Detailed modelling of the vulnerability of domestic housing to tropical cyclone winds", Proc. 11th AMOS International conference on storms and disaster mitigation, Brisbane, Australia.
  9. Henderson, D, and Ginger, J. (2005), "Vulnerability of JCU Group 4 House to cyclonic wind loading", CTS Report TS614 for Geoscience Australia.
  10. Henderson, D. J., Ginger, J. D., Leitch, C., Boughton, G. N. and Falck, D. (2006), "Tropical cyclone larry - damage to buildings in the innisfail area", James Cook Cyclone Testing Station Technical Report No. 51.
  11. Holmes, J. D. (2001), Wind Loading of Structures, Spon Press, London, U.K.
  12. JCU (1972) "Cyclone Althea", Report and recommendations prepared by the Engineering Department, James Cook University for the Queensland Government.
  13. Holmes, J. D. (1985), "Wind loads and limit states design", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE Aust., CE2.
  14. Leicester, R. and Reardon, G.F. (1976) "A statistical analysis of the structural damage by cyclone Tracy", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE Aust., CE18, 50-54.
  15. Leicester, R. H., Pham, L. and Kleeman, P. W. (1985), "Use of reliability concepts in the conversion of codes to limit states design", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE Aust., CE27, 1-7.
  16. Li, Y. and Ellingwood, B. R. (2006), "Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment", Eng. Struct., 28, 1009-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005
  17. Melchers, R. E. (1985), "Reliability calculation for structures", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE Aust., CE27, 124-129.
  18. Morgan, J. and Beck, V. R. (1977) "Failure of sheet metal roofing under repeated wind loading", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE. Aust., CE19, 290-294.
  19. Pinelli, J.-P., Gurley, C., Subramanian, C. and Hamid, S. (2005), "Hurricane loss prediction model and coastal damage mitigation", EACWE4-The Fourth European & African Conference on Wind Engineering, Paper #224, ITAM AS CR Prague.
  20. Pham, L., Holmes, J. D. and Leicester, R. H. (1983), "Safety indices for wind loading in Australia", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 14, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(83)90005-3
  21. Pham, L. (1985), "Load combinations and probabilistic load models for limit state codes", Civ. Eng. Trans., IE Aust., CE27, 62-67.
  22. Queensland Home Building Code. (1981), Appendix 4 to the Standard Building By-Laws 1975 Under the Building Act 1975-1981, Government Printer, Queensland.
  23. Reardon, G. F., Walker, G. R. and Jancauskas, E. D. (1986), "Effects of cyclone winifred on buildings", James Cook Cyclone Structural Testing Station Technical Report No. 27.
  24. Reardon, G.F. (1996) "Simulated wind loading of full size houses", Proc. Int. Seminar: The Role of Large and Full Scale Testing, Inst. of Struct. Eng./ City University, London, UK.
  25. Reardon, G. F., Henderson, D. and Ginger J. (1999), "A structural assessment of the effects of Cyclone Vance on houses in Exmouth WA", Cyclone Testing Station, James Cook University, Technical Report No. 48.
  26. Standards Australia (2002), Structural design actions - Part 0: General principles, AS/NZS 1170.0:2002, Standards Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  27. Standards Australia (2002), Structural design actions - Part 2: Wind actions, AS/NZS 1170.2:2002, Standards Australia, Sydney NSW, Australia.
  28. Standards Australia (1999), Residential timber-framed construction - Cyclonic areas, AS 1684.3:1999 Standards Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  29. Unanwa, C. O., McDonald, J. R., Mehta, K. C. and Smith, D. A. (2000), "The development of wind damage bands for buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 84, 119-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00047-1
  30. Walker, G. R. (1975), "Report on Cyclone Tracy - Effect on buildings - Dec 1974", Australian Dept of Housing and Construction, Vol 1.

Cited by

  1. Cost-benefit analysis of climate change adaptation for power pole networks vol.143, pp.3-4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2000-6
  2. Damage Analysis and Evaluation of Light Steel Structures Exposed to Wind Hazards vol.7, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030239
  3. “Three Little Pigs” Project: Hurricane Risk Mitigation by Integrated Wind Tunnel and Full-Scale Laboratory Tests vol.11, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000019
  4. Fragility analysis of roof damage to industrial buildings subject to extreme wind loading in non-cyclonic regions vol.128, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.053
  5. State of the Art of Hurricane Vulnerability Estimation Methods: A Review vol.16, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000153
  6. Direct and Indirect Cost-and-Benefit Assessment of Climate Adaptation Strategies for Housing for Extreme Wind Events in Queensland vol.15, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000136
  7. Assessment of damage to residential construction from the tornadoes in Vaughan, Ontario, on 20 August 2009 vol.41, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0570
  8. Reliability based vulnerability modelling of metal-clad industrial buildings to extreme wind loading for cyclonic regions vol.147, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.10.002
  9. Risk and economic viability of housing climate adaptation strategies for wind hazards in southeast Australia vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9510-y
  10. Analysis of the interrelationship between houses, trees and damage in a cyclone affected city: Can landscape design and planning utilising trees minimise cyclone impact? 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.031
  11. Reliability assessment of power pole infrastructure incorporating deterioration and network maintenance vol.132, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.019
  12. Probabilistic analysis of climate change impacts on timber power pole networks vol.78, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.11.061
  13. Cyclone Damage Risks Caused by Enhanced Greenhouse Conditions and Economic Viability of Strengthened Residential Construction vol.12, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000024
  14. Vulnerability of roofing components to wind loads vol.14, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.4.321
  15. Fragility and climate impact assessment of contemporary housing roof sheeting failure due to extreme wind vol.171, pp.None, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.125
  16. Modelling vulnerability of Australian housing to severe wind events: past and present vol.21, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2020.1744900
  17. Risk-based cost-benefit analysis of climate adaptation measures for Australian contemporary houses under extreme winds vol.1, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-020-00002-1
  18. Regional variability of climate change adaptation feasibility for timber power poles vol.17, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1843505
  19. Wind Performance Assessment of Postdisaster Housing in the Philippines vol.22, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000491
  20. Methodology for Regional Multihazard Hurricane Damage and Risk Assessment vol.147, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0003144