DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Control of the along-wind response of steel framed buildings by using viscoelastic or friction dampers

  • Mazza, Fabio (Dipartimento di Strutture, Universita della Calabria) ;
  • Vulcano, Alfonso (Dipartimento di Strutture, Universita della Calabria)
  • Received : 2006.09.23
  • Accepted : 2007.04.01
  • Published : 2007.06.25

Abstract

The insertion of steel braces has become a common technique to limit the deformability of steel framed buildings subjected to wind loads. However, when this technique is inadequate to keep floor accelerations within acceptable levels of human comfort, dampers placed in series with the steel braces can be adopted. To check the effectiveness of braces equipped with viscoelastic (VEDs) or friction dampers (FRDs), a numerical investigation is carried out focusing attention on a three-bay fifteen-storey steel framed building with K-braces. More precisely, three alternative structural solutions are examined for the purpose of controlling wind-induced vibrations: the insertion of additional diagonal braces; the insertion of additional diagonal braces equipped with dampers; the insertion of both additional diagonal braces and dampers supported by the existing K-braces. Additional braces and dampers are designed according to a simplified procedure based on a proportional stiffness criterion. A dynamic analysis is carried out in the time domain using a step-by-step initial-stress-like iterative procedure. Along-wind loads are considered at each storey assuming the time histories of the wind velocity, for a return period $T_r=5$ years, according to an equivalent wind spectrum technique. The behaviour of the structural members, except dampers, is assumed linear elastic. A VED and an FRD are idealized by a six-element generalized model and a bilinear (rigid-plastic) model, respectively. The results show that the structure with damped additional braces can be considered, among those examined, the most effective to control vibrations due to wind, particularly the floor accelerations. Moreover, once the stiffness of the additional braces is selected, the VEDs are slightly more efficient than the FRDs, because they, unlike the FRDs, dissipate energy also for small amplitude vibrations.

Keywords

References

  1. Casciaro, R. (1975), "Time evolutional analysis of nonlinear structures", Meccanica, 3, 156-167.
  2. Eurocode 1 (2004), "Actions on structures - part 1-4: wind actions", UNI ENV 1991-1-4.
  3. Eurocode 3 (2003), "Design of steel structures - part 1-1: general rules", UNI ENV 1993-1-1.
  4. Housner, G. W., Bergman, L. A., Caughey, T. K., Chassiakos, A. G., Claus, R. O., Masri, S. F., Skelton, R. E., Soong, T. T., Spencer, B. F. and Yao, T. P. (1997), "Structural control: past, present and future", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 123(9), 897-908. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)
  5. Kareem, A., Kijewski, T. and Tamura Y. (1999), "Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications", Wind Struct., 2, 201-251. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.1999.2.3.201
  6. Mazza, F. and Vulcano, A. (2001), "Modelling of viscoelastically damped braces used for the seismic protection of framed buildings", Proc. of the 5th World Congress on Joints, Bearings and Seismic Systems for Concrete Structures, American Concrete Institute, Rome (Italy), September.
  7. Samali, B. and Kwok K.C.S. (1995), "The use of viscoelastic dampers in reducing wind and earthquake-induced motion of building structures", Eng. Struct., 17, 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(95)00034-5
  8. Shen, K.L. and Soong T.T. (1995), "Modeling of viscoelastic dampers for structural applications", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 121, 694-701. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:6(694)
  9. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R. H. (1986), Wind Effects on Structures, John Wiley & Sons, New York (U.S.A).
  10. Solari, G. (1988), "Equivalent wind spectrum technique: theory and applications", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 113, 1303-1323.
  11. Soong, T. T. and Dargush, G. F. (1997), Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  12. Tamura, Y. (1998), "Application of damping devices to suppress wind-induced responses of buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 74-76, 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00006-3
  13. Vulcano, A. (1994), "Design of damped steel bracing systems for seismic control of framed structures", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna (Austria), August-September, 3, 1567-1572.
  14. Vulcano, A. (2000), "Use of braces with viscoelastic devices to control the vibrations of framed structures subjected to wind load" (in italian), Proceedings of the 6th National Conference of Wind Engineering "INVENTO-2000", Genoa (Italy), September, 381-388.

Cited by

  1. Nonlinear seismic analysis of unsymmetric-plan structures retrofitted by hysteretic damped braces vol.14, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9873-z
  2. Wind and earthquake dynamic responses of fire-exposed steel framed structures vol.78, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.08.005
  3. Dynamic Response of Steel Framed Structures Fire-Retrofitted with Viscoelastic-Damped Braces vol.15, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0134-y
  4. A numerical method for the time-domain dynamic analysis of buildings equipped with viscoelastic dampers vol.18, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.388
  5. Control of the earthquake and wind dynamic response of steel-framed buildings by using additional braces and/or viscoelastic dampers vol.40, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1012
  6. Vibration control by damped braces of fire-damaged steel structures subjected to wind and seismic loads vol.83, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.01.003
  7. A distributed plasticity model to simulate the biaxial behaviour in the nonlinear analysis of spatial framed structures vol.135, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.01.018
  8. Equivalent viscous damping for displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting framed buildings vol.12, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9601-5
  9. Nonlinear analysis of r.c. framed buildings retrofitted with elastomeric and friction bearings under near-fault earthquakes vol.28, pp.5-6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11589-015-0133-0
  10. Optimum bracing design under wind load by using topology optimization vol.18, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2014.18.5.497
  11. Displacement-based design procedure of damped braces for the seismic retrofitting of r.c. framed buildings vol.13, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9709-7
  12. Displacement-based seismic design of hysteretic damped braces for retrofitting in-elevation irregular r.c. framed structures vol.69, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.029
  13. Comparative study of the seismic response of RC framed buildings retrofitted using modern techniques vol.9, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.1.029
  14. Simplified analysis of frame structures with viscoelastic dampers considering the effect of soil-structure interaction vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0377-x
  15. Frequency-independent hysteretic dampers for mitigating wind-induced vibrations of tall buildings pp.15452255, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2341
  16. Optimal shape of LCVA for vibration control of structures subjected to along wind excitation vol.10, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.6.573
  17. Dynamic analysis of frames with viscoelastic dampers: a comparison of damper models vol.41, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.1.113