Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제27권6호
  • /
  • Pages.671-682
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance evaluation of a RC special moment frame

  • Kim, Taewan (Department of Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jinkoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University)
  • 투고 : 2006.10.30
  • 심사 : 2007.06.12
  • 발행 : 2007.12.20
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The probability and the reliability-based seismic performance evaluation procedure proposed in the FEMA-355F was applied to a reinforced concrete moment frame building in this study. For the FEMA procedure, which was originally developed for steel moment frame structures, to be applied to other structural systems, the capacity should be re-defined and the factors reflecting the uncertainties related to capacity and demand need to be determined. To perform the evaluation procedure a prototype building was designed per IBC 2003, and inelastic dynamic analyses were conducted applying site-specific ground motions to determine the parameters for performance evaluation. According to the analysis results, distribution of the determined capacities turned out to be relatively smaller than that of the demands, which showed that the defined capacity was reasonable. It was also shown that the prototype building satisfied the target performance since the determined confidence levels exceeded the objectives for both local and global collapses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI 318 (2002), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (318R-02). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hill, MI
  2. ATC (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building. ATC-40 Report, Applied Technical Council, Redwood City, CA
  3. Cornell, C.A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R.O. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), 'Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(4), 526-533 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  4. Elenas, A. and Meskouris, K. (2001), 'Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures', Eng. Struct., 23, 698-704 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  5. Erbay, O.O., Yun, S.-Y., Foutch, D.A. and Aschheim, M.A. (2004), UIUC Extensions to the Library of Elements for DRAIN-2DX. Paper No. 2530, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  6. FEMA-273 (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C
  7. FEMA-274 (1997), NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C
  8. FEMA-355F (2000), State of the Art Report on Performance Prediction and Evaluation of Steel Moment-frame Buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C
  9. Ghobarah, A., Abou-Elfath, H. and Biddah, A. (1999), 'Response-based damage assessment of structures', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 79-104 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199901)28:1<79::AID-EQE805>3.0.CO;2-J
  10. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1997), Vibration Properties of Buildings Determined from Recorded Earthquake Motions. Report No. UCB/EERC-97/14, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  11. ICC (2003), International Building Code. International Code Council, Inc., Birmingham, AL
  12. Izuno, K., lemura, H., Yamada, Y. and Fujisawa, S. (1993), 'Seismic damage assessment of RC structures using different hysteretic models', Memoirs Faculty Eng., 55(1), 1-19
  13. Jalayer, F. and Cornell, C.A. (2003), A Technical Framework for Probability-based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats. PEER Report 2003/8, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
  14. Kim, T.-W., Foutch, D.A., Lafave, J.M. and Wilcoski, J. (2004), Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls for Seismic Loads. Structural Research Series - No. 634, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
  15. Lee, K. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), 'Seismic performance evaluation of pre-Northridge steel frame buildings with brittle connections', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(4), 546-555 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(546)
  16. Lee, K. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), 'Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 653-670 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147
  17. Nowak, A.S. and Szerszen, M.M. (2001), Reliablility-based Calibration for Structural Concrete, Phase 1. Research Report UMCEE 01-04, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  18. Park, Y.J. and Aug, A.H.-S. (1985), 'Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 111(4), 722-739 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  19. Prakash, V., Powell, G. and Campbell, S. (1993), DRAIN-2DX base Program Description and User Guide version 1.10. Report no. UCB/SEMM-93/17 and 93/18, Structural Eng. Mechanics and Materials, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA
  20. SEAOC (1995), Performance based Seismic Engineering of Building. SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California, CA
  21. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Puntamurthula, S. and Sun, J. (1997), Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project. SAC Background Document Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, SAC Joint Venture, Richmond, CA
  22. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), 'Incremental dynamic analysis', Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  23. Yun, S.-Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), 'Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames', J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 128(4), 534-545 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534)

피인용 문헌

  1. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Nonseismic Designed Flat-Plate Structures vol.22, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:6(356)
  2. Seismic Performance Evaluation and Retrofit of Fixed Jacket Offshore Platform Structures vol.29, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000576
  3. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Special Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frames With Hybrid Slit-Friction Damper vol.17, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9712/KASS.2017.17.4.035
  4. Maximum axial load level and minimum confinement for limited ductility design of high-strength concrete columns vol.6, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2009.6.5.357
  5. Concurrent flexural strength and deformability design of high-performance concrete beams vol.40, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.541
  6. Seismic retrofit of structures using steel honeycomb dampers vol.17, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-015-0101-5
  7. Seismic response of RC frames under far-field mainshock and near-fault aftershock sequences vol.72, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.3.395
  8. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Moment Frames with Gravity Columns vol.25, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000472
  9. Reliability-Based Probabilistic Safety Evaluation of Seismic Design Approaches for RC-MR Buildings vol.7, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.0001128