DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preliminary design and inelastic assessment of earthquake-resistant structural systems

  • Rubinstein, Marcelo (Instituto de Mecanica Aplicada y Estructuras (IMAE), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingenieria y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional de Rosario) ;
  • Moller, Oscar (Instituto de Mecanica Aplicada y Estructuras (IMAE), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Ingenieria y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional de Rosario) ;
  • Giuliano, Alejandro (Instituto Nacional de Prevencion Sismica)
  • Received : 2005.12.30
  • Accepted : 2006.12.22
  • Published : 2007.06.20

Abstract

A preliminary performance-based seismic design methodology is proposed. The top yield displacement of the system is computed from these of the components, which are assumed constant. Besides, a simple procedure to evaluate the top yield displacement of frames is developed. Seismic demands are represented in the form of yield point spectra. The methodology is general, conceptually transparent, uses simple calculations based on first principles and is applicable to asymmetric systems. To consider a specific situation two earthquake levels, occasional and rare are considered. The advantage of an arbitrary assignment of strength to the different components to reduce eccentricities and improved the torsional response of the system is addressed. The methodology is applied to an asymmetric five story building, and the results are verified by push-over analysis and non linear dynamic analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Aschheim, M. and Black, E.F. (2000), 'Yield point spectra for seismic design and rehabilitation', Earthq. Spectra, 16(2)
  2. Bertero, R.D. (1996), 'Disefio sismorresistente basado en la performance', Memorias X Jornadas Argentinas de Hormigon Pretensado y XV Jornadas Argentinas de Ingenieria Estructural
  3. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1975), Dynamics of Structures, Me Graw Hill
  4. Collins, K.R., Wen, Y.K. and Foutch, D.A. (1996), 'Dual - level seismic design: a reliability - based methodology', Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25,1433-1467 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199612)25:12<1433::AID-EQE629>3.0.CO;2-M
  5. Fajfar, P. (1992), 'Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue', Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 21, 837-848 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290211001
  6. Fajfar, P. and Gaspersic, P. (1996), 'The n2 method for the seismic damage analysis of rc buildings', Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 25, 31-46 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO;2-V
  7. Freeman, S.A. (1994), 'Capacity Spectrum Method', Proc. of the 1994 Fall Seminar on the Development Art of Seismic Engineering, November 8, 15 and 22, San Francisco CA
  8. Giuliano, A.P., Martinez, M., Rubinstein, M. and Moller, O. (2003), 'Disefio preliminar de sistemas estructurales sismorresistentes', Memorias XI Seminario Iberoamericano de Ingenieria Sismica y 6-EIPAC.
  9. INPRES (1995), 'Microzonificacion Sismica del Gran Mendoza', PublicacionTecnica 19
  10. INPRES-CIRSOC 103 (2000), Proyecto de Reglamento Argentino para Construcciones Sismorresistentes, Parte II, Construcciones de Hormigon Armado
  11. Moehle, J.P. (1992), 'Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes', Earthq. Spectra, 8(3), 403-428 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585688
  12. Moller, O. (2001), 'Metodologia para evaluaci6n de la probabilidad de falla de estructuras sismorresistentes y calibracion de codigos', Tesis de Doctorado en Ingenieria, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, 249 paginas
  13. Moller, O. and Foschi, R. (2003), 'Reliability evaluation in seismic design: A response surface methodology', Earthq. Spectra, 19(3), 579-603 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1598200
  14. Paulay, T. (2001), 'Some design principles relevant to torsional phenomena in ductile buildings', J. Earthq. Eng., Imperial College Press, 5(3), 273-308 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363246901000443
  15. Paulay, T. (2002), 'An estimation of displacement limits for ductile systems', Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31, 583-599 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.157
  16. Priestley, M.J.N. (1993), 'Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering - Conflicts between design and reality', Proceedings of the Tom Paulay Symposium 'Recent developments in lateral force transfer in buildings', California
  17. Priestley, M.J.N. (1998), 'Brief comments on elastic flexibility of reinforced concrete frames and significance to seismic design', Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 31(4)
  18. Rubinstein, M., Moller, O. and Giuliano, A.P. (2001), 'Inelastic displacement based design approach of ric building structures in seismic regions', Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(6), 573-594 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.6.573
  19. Rubinstein, M., Moller, O. and Giuliano, A.P. (2004), 'Preliminary design and inelastic verification of earthquake - resistant structural systems', Proc. of 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
  20. Rubinstein, M., Moller, O. and Giuliano, A.P. (2005), 'Aspectos actuales del disefio preliminar de sistemas estructurales sismorresistentes y su verificaci6n inelastica', Memorias del Congreso Chileno de Sismologia e Ingenieria Antisismica - IX Jornadas, Concepcion, Chile
  21. VISION 2000 (1995), 'Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings', Structural Engineers Association of California

Cited by

  1. Flexural Strength and Deformability Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams vol.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.176
  2. Maximum axial load level and minimum confinement for limited ductility design of high-strength concrete columns vol.6, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2009.6.5.357
  3. Concurrent flexural strength and deformability design of high-performance concrete beams vol.40, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.541