Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Daily Path Lengths in Arboreal Primates

  • Lappan, Susan (Department of EcoSciences, Ewha Woman's University)
  • Published : 2007.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Researchers have used a variety of methods to measure patterns of animal movement, including the use of spatial data (mapping the position of a moving animal at specified intervals) and direct estimation of travel path length by pacing under a moving animal or group. I collected movement data from five groups of siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) using two different methods concurrently to estimate the effects of the method of data collection on estimates of daily path length (DPL). Estimates of DPL produced from spatial data collected at 15-minute intervals were 12% lower than estimates of DPL produced by pacing under the traveling animal. The actual magnitude of the difference was correlated with the travel distance, but there was no correlation between the proportional difference and the travel distance. While the collection of spatial data is generally preferable, as spatial data permit additional analyses of patterns of movements in two or three dimensions, the relatively small difference between the DPL's produced using different methods suggests that pacing is an acceptable substitute where the collection of spatial data is impractical. I also subsampled the spatial data at increasing time intervals to assess the effect of sampling interval on the calculation of daily path lengths. Longer sampling intervals produced significantly shorter estimates of travel paths than shorter sampling intervals. These results suggest that spatial data should be collected at short time intervals wherever possible, and that sampling intervals should not exceed 30 minutes. Researchers should be cautious when comparing data generated using different methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahsan MF. Socio-ecology of the hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock) in two forests of Bangladesh; 2000 May 10-13, 2000; Brookfield Zoo. Chicago Zoological Park, Chicago
  2. Bartlett TQ. 1999. Feeding and ranging behavior of the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. (PhD Dissertation). St. Louis, MO: Washington University-St. Louis
  3. Bartlett TQ. 2007. The hylobatidae: small apes of Asia. In: Primates in Perspective (Campbell CJ, Fuentes A, MacKinnon KC, Panger M, Bearder SK, eds). New York Oxford University Press, New York. p 274- 289
  4. Bonfil R, Meyer M, Scholl MC, Johnson R, O'Brien S, Oosthuizen H, Swanson S, Kotze D, Paterson M. 2005. Transoceanic migration, spatial dynamics, and population linkages of white sharks. Science 310: 100-103 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114898
  5. Cheyne SM. 2004. Assessing rehabilitation and reintroduction of captive-raised gibbons in Indonesia (unpublished PhD thesis). Cambridge: University of Cambridge. 231 p
  6. Chivers DJ. 1974. The Siamang in Malaya: A Field Study of a Primate in Tropical Rain Forest. Kuhn H, Luckett, WP, Noback, CR, Schultz, AH, Starck, D. Szalay, FS., editor. 1st ed. Basel: Karger. 335 p
  7. Chivers DJ. 1987. Feeding and ranging in gibbons. In: The lesser apes: evolutionary and behavioural biology. (Preuschoft H, Chivers DJ, Brockelman WY, Creel N, eds). Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. p 267- 281
  8. Chivers DJ. 2000. The swinging singing apes: fighting for food and family in far-east forests, Brookfield Zoo. Chicago Zoological Park, Chicago
  9. Corbin G, Schmid J. 1995. Insect secretions determine habitat use patterns by a female lesser mouse lemur. Am J Primatol 37: 317-324 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.1350370406
  10. Gursky S. 1998. Effects of radio transmitter weight on a small nocturnal primate. Am J Primatol 46: 145-155 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1998)46:2<145::AID-AJP4>3.0.CO;2-W
  11. Isbell LA, Pruetz JD, Nzuma BM, Young TP. 1999. Comparing measures of travel distances in primates: methodological considerations and sociological implications. Am J Primatol 48: 87-98 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)48:2<87::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-G
  12. Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, Brown JH. 2004. The scaling of animal space use. Science 306: 266-268 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102138
  13. Kappeler M. 1981. The Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates lar Moloch): ecology and behavior (Unpubl. PhD thesis). Basel: University of Basel
  14. Kinnaird MF, O'Brien TG. 1998. Ecological effects of wildfire on lowland rainforest in Sumatra. Conserv Biol 12: 954-956 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.012005954.x
  15. Lappan S. 2005. Biparental care and male reproductive strategies in siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) in southern Sumatra (Dissertation). New York City: New York University. 312 p
  16. Lappan S. 2007a. Patterns of dispersal in Sumatran siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus): preliminary mtDNA evidence suggests more frequent male than female dispersal to adjacent groups. Am J Primatol 69: 692-698 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20382
  17. Lappan S. 2007b. Social relationships among males in multi-male siamang groups. Int J Primatol 28(2)
  18. Martin PM, Bateson PB. 1993. Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide. 2 ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 221 p
  19. O'Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Anton N, Prasetyaningrum MDP, Iqbal M. 2003. Fire, demography and the persistence of siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus: Hylobatidae) in a Sumatran rainforest. Anim Conserv 6: 115-121 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1367943003003159
  20. Palombit RA. 1995. Longitudinal patterns of reproduction in wild female siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar). Int J Primatol 16: 739-760 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735718
  21. Plissner JH, Gowaty PA. 1996. Patterns of natal dispersal, turnover and dispersal costs in eastern bluebirds. Anim Behav 51: 1307-1322 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0135
  22. Priotto J, Steinmann A, Polop J. 2002. Factors affecting home range size and overlap in Calomys venustus (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) in Argentine agroecosystems. Mamm Biol 67: 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1078/1616-5047-00014
  23. Serneels S, Lambin EF. 2001. Impact of land-use changes on the wildebeest migration in the northern part of the Serengeti-Mara ecosystem. J Biogeo 28: 391-407 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00557.x
  24. Srikosamatara S. 1987. Ecology of pileated gibbons in South-East Thailand. In: Preuschoft H, Chivers DJ, Brockelman WY, Creel N, editors. The lesser apes: evolutionary and behavioural biology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. p 242-257
  25. Tutin CEG, Fernandez M. 1991. Responses of wild chimpanzees and gorillas to the arrival of primatologists: behaviour observed during habituation. In: Primate responses to environmental change (Box HO, ed). Chapman and Hall, London. p 187-196
  26. Watts DP. 1991. Strategies of habitat use by mountain gorillas. Folia Primatol 56: 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1159/000156521
  27. Yamagiwa J, Mwanza N. 1994. Day-journey length and daily diet of solitary male gorillas in lowland and highland habitats. Int J Primatol 15: 207-224 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735274