Effects of a Forced Air-Flow System for Recovery of Turfgrass after Intensive Traffic Injury

집중적 답압 피해에서의 잔디 회복을 위한 강제 흡.호기 순환식 설비의 효과

  • Lee, Jeong-Ho (Dept. of Biological Resources and Technology, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Son, Jin-Su (Dept. of Biological Resources and Technology, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Kim, In-Chul (Dept. of Biological Resources and Technology, Yonsei Univ.) ;
  • Joo, Young-Kyoo (Dept. of Biological Resources and Technology, Yonsei Univ.)
  • 이정호 (연세대학교 생물자원공학과) ;
  • 손진수 (연세대학교 생물자원공학과) ;
  • 김인철 (연세대학교 생물자원공학과) ;
  • 주영규 (연세대학교 생물자원공학과)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

Korea and Japan hosted the FIFA World Cup Soccer Game in 2002. Ten stadiums had been built and more than 30 soccer grounds for practice were renovated in Korea. Sport fields in both countries had problems on cool-season turfgrass growth and quality by summer decline during humid and warm climate especially followed by intensive uses. We measured the effects of air-flow system, which is designed to optimize rootzone soil gas and moisture levels to promote the growth and maintenance turfgrass. This experiment was carried out to verify the effects of the system on soil gas exchange, ground resilience, and turfgrass recovery in turfgrass rootzone. Within 1 or 2hr of operation of the system, rootzone soil gas ($CO_2$, $O_2$) levels returned to natural atmospheric levels completely Soil $CO_2$ levels began to decrease within the first 10 min of operation of the system. The levels were reduced from 1.3 to 0.06% after 30 min, and natural atmospheric levels within 1 hr. When the system was turned off, $CO_2$ levels increased to 0.36% and 0.7% after 5 and 20 hr, respectively. The application of the system did not affect the resilience of turf surface after traffic treatments. Higher traffic treatment resulted in higher surface resilience especially in zoysiagrass plots. Operation of the system had a significant beneficial impact on turf recovery by increased root dry wight and improved turf quality, as compared with the non-operated check plots.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, W.A. and R.J. Gibbs. 1994. Natural turf sport and amenity science and practice. CAB International, Willingford, Oxen, UK. p. 27, 41-48
  2. Aldous, D.E. and J.E. Kaufmann. 1979. Role of root temperature in shoot growth of two Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. Agron. J. 71: 54 5-547 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100040006x
  3. Beard, J.B. and S.I. Sifers 1990. Feasivility assessment of randomly oriented, interlocking mesh element matrices for turfed root zones. In Natural and artificial playing fields. p. 154- 165
  4. Canaway, P.M., M.J. Bell., G. Holmes, and S.W. Baker. 1990. Standards for the playing qualty of natural turf for association football. In Natural and artificial playing fields: Characteristics and safety features. R.C. Schmidt, E.F. Hoerner, E.M. Miller, and C.A. Morehouse,(eds). American society for testing materals. Philadelphia. P.A. vol 1073. p. 29-47
  5. Hook, D.D. and Scholtens J.R. 1978. Adaptations and flood tolerance of tree species. In Hook. D.D, and Crawford RMM(eds). Ann Arbor Science Publ. Ann Arbor. p. 299 - 331
  6. Huang. B., X. Liu. and J.D. Fry. 1998. Effect of high temperature and poor soil aeration on root growth and viability of creeping bentgrass. Crop science. vol. 38. issue 6. p. 1618-1622 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060034x
  7. Kroyanagi, T., and G.M. Paulsen. 1988. Mediation of high-temperature injury by roots and shoots during reproductive growth of wheat. Plant Cell Environ. vol. 11. p. 517-523 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1988.tb01790.x
  8. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program(NTEP). 1997. National Zoysiagrass test-1996. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville, MD. 20705. Progress Report 1997 NTEP No.98-4
  9. Rogers, J.N., III, and D.V. Waddington. 1990. Potable apparatus for assessing impact characteristics of athletic field surfaces. In Natural and artificial playing fields: Characteristics and safety features. R.C. Schmidt, E.F. Hoerner, E.M. Miller, and C.A. Morehouse,(eds). American society for testing materals. Philadelphia. P.A. vol. 1073. p. 96 -110
  10. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user's guide. vol. 2. 4th edition. SAS Institute. Cary. NC
  11. USGA recommendation for a method of putting green construction. 1988. http://www.usga.orglgreen
  12. 축산기술연구소. 1996. 표준사료분석법. 농촌진흥청. p. 1-19