참고문헌
- Ministry of health and welfare. Annual report of the central cancer registry in Korea. 2002
- Mok JE, Lee DH, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Clinical analysis of 1058 patients with uterine cervical cancer. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2001;44:101-13
- Montz FJ, Farber FL, Bristow RE, Comelison T. Impact of increasing Papanicolaou test sensitivity and compliance: A modeled cost and outcomes analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:781-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01322-9
- Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer 1999;80:827-41 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990315)80:6<827::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO;2-P
- Fetherston WC. False-negative cytology in invasive cancer of the cervix. Clinical Obstet Gynecol 1983;26:929
- Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JR. False-negative results in cervical cytology studies. Acta Cytol 1985;29:1043-6
- Dodd LG, Sneige N, Villarreal Y, et al. Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsies. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:138-44 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840090206
- Bishop JW, Bigner SH, Colgan TJ, et al. Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears, including initial biopsy results. Acta Cytol 1998;42:189-97 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331545
- Lorincz AT, Temple GF, Kurman RJ, Jenson AB, Lancaster WD. Oncogenic association of specific human papillomavirus types with cervical neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1987;79:671-7
- Lee JR, Seop SE, Lee JH, et al. Clinical significance of HPV DNA test for management of patients with diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:268-75
- Obwegeser JH, Brack S. Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? A prospective, randomized trial comparing the ThinPep Pap test with the conventional Pap test, including follow-up of HSIL cases. Acta Cytopathol 2001;45:709-14
- Carpenter AB, Davey DD. Thinprep Pap Test: Performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1999;87:105-12
-
Lim YK, Lim JC, Kim JH et al. Comparison of efficacy between MonoPrep
$^{\circledR}$ and Papanicolaou smear for cervical cancer screening. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2004;47:109-17 - Jang J, Kim J, Cho KJ, Khang SK, Nam JH, Gong G. A comparision of AutoCyte PREP with matched conventional smear in cervicovaginal cytology. Korean J Cytopathol 2002;13:8-13
- Jeon YK, Kim OR, Park KW, Kang SB, Park IA. Liquidbased cytology using MonoPrep2(TM) system in cervicovaginal cytology: comparative study with conventional Pap smear and histology. Korean J Cytopathol 2004;15:33-39
- Park JM, Lee JG, Suh IS. Clinical efficacy of manual liquidbased cervicovaginal cytology preparation: Comparative study with conventional Papanicolaou test. Korean J Cytopathol 2005;16:10-7
- La YH, Jo GC, Han ST, et al. A comparative analysis of cervical Pap smears prepared by conventional and ThinPrep method. Korean J Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:1450-1458
- Hutchinson ML, Isenstein LM, Goodman A, et al. Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep processor. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:215-9 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/101.2.215
- Wilbur DC, Cibas ES, Merritt S, James LP, Berger BM, Bonfiglio TA. ThinPrep processor: Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:209-14 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/101.2.209
- Paillo JL, Zarka MA, St. John TL. Evaluation of the ThinPrep pap test in clinical practice: A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont. Acta Cytol 1998;42:203-8 https://doi.org/10.1159/000331547
- Tench W. Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP. J Reprod Med 2000;45:912-6
- Klinkamer PJ, Meerding WJ, Posier PF, Hanselaar AG. Liquid-based cervical cytology. Cancer 2003;99:263-71 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11673
- Abulafia O. Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90:137-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00176-8
- Fremont-Smith M, Marino J, Griffin B, Spencer L, Bolick D. Comparison of the SurePathTM Liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multicenter Direct-to Vial study. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;102:269-79
- Colgan TJ, Mclachlin CM, Cotterchio M, Howlett R, Seidenfeld AM, Mai VM. Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-Surepath in the Ontario screening program. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2004;102:362-7
- Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening: Results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical cancer. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 1999;87:48-55
- Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening. BMJ 2003;326:733-7 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7392.733
- Taylor S, Kuhn L, Dupree W, et al. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial. Int J Cancer 2006;118:957-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21434
- Vassilakos P, Saurel J, Rondez R. Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based reparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories. Acta Cytol 1999:43:65-8 https://doi.org/10.1159/000330870
- Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Franco E, Arseneau J, Richart RM, Wright TC. Conventional cervical cytologic smears vs. ThinPrep smear. A paired comparison study on cervical Cytology. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1136-42 https://doi.org/10.1159/000333971
- Weintraub J, Morabia A. Efficacy of a liquid-based Thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:52-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(200001)22:1<52::AID-DC14>3.0.CO;2-#
- Wachtel MS, Boon ME, Korporaal H, Kok LP. Human papillomavirus testing as a cytology gold standard: comparing Surinam with the Netherlands. Modern Pathol 2005;18:349-53 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800242