설비공학논문집 (Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering)

  • 제19권5호
  • /
  • Pages.403-410
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1229-6422(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-7611(eISSN)
대한설비공학회 (The Society of Air-Conditioning and Refrigerating Engineers of Korea)
권호 표지

자동차 공조기용 R12 및 R134a 대체 냉매의 성능평가

Performance of Alternative Refrigerants for R12 and R134a in Automobile Air-Conditioners

  • 백인철 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 박기정 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 심윤보 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 정동수 (인하대학교 기계공학과)
  • 발행 : 2007.05.10
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, natural refrigerants and their mixtures that can supplement and replace R12 and R134a in automobile air-conditioners are studied. R134a is currently used as the refrigerant in new motor vehicle air conditioners, replacing the ozone depleting refrigerant R12. Although R134a has no ozone depletion potential, it has a relatively large global warming potential, approximately 1300 times that of $CO_2$ over a 100 year time horizon. For this reason, performance of natural refrigerants and their mixtures containing R152a, RE170 (Dimethylether, DME) and R600a (Isobutane) are measured under 2 different temperature conditions. They were tested in a refrigerating bench tester with an open type compressor. The test bench provided about 4 kW capacity and water and water/glycol mixture were employed as the secondary heat transfer fluids. Test results show that the coefficient of performance (COP) of these refrigerants is up to 21.55% higher than that of R12 in all temperature conditions. Overall, these fluids provide good performance with reasonable energy savings without any environmental problem and thus can be used as long term alternatives for automobile air-conditioners.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1989, Final Act, United Nations Environment Programme
  2. Jetter, J., 1996, Evaluation of alternatives for HFC-134a refrigerant in motor vehicle air conditioning, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ozone Protection Technologies, Washington, DC., USA, pp. 845-854
  3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996, Climate change 1995: The science of climate change, Cambridge University Press, p.22
  4. Kruse, H., 1996, The state of the art of the hydrocarbon technology in household refrigeration, Proc. of the Int. conferences on ozone protection technologies, Washington (DC), pp. 179-188
  5. Jung, D., Kim, C., Song, K. and Park, B., 2000, Testing of propane/isobutane mixture in domestic refrigerators, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 23, pp.517-527 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00084-5
  6. Int. Energy Agency's Heat Pump Center, Informative fact sheet, 2002, Hydrocarbons as refrigerants in residential heat pumps and air-conditioners
  7. Jung, D., Park, B. and Lee, H., 1999, Evaluation of supplementary/retrofit refrigerants for automobile air-conditioners charged with CFC12, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. 22, pp.558-568 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-7007(99)00022-5
  8. Mulroy, W., Kauffeld, M., McLinden, M. O. and Didion, D. A., 1988, Experimental evaluation of two refrigerant mixtures in a breadboard air conditioner, Proc, of Int. Inst. Refrigeration, Purdue Conference on CFCs, Commissions 81, B2, E1 & E2, pp.27-34
  9. Didion, D. A. and Bivens, D. B., 1990, Role of refrigerant mixtures as alternatives to CFCs, Int. J. Refrigeration, Vol. B, pp. 163-175
  10. Radermacher, R. and Jung, D., 1993, Theoretical analysis of replacement refrigerants for R22 for residential uses, ASHRAE Trans., Vol. 99, Part1, pp.333-343
  11. McLinden, M. O., Klein, S. A., Lemmon, E. W. and Peskin, A. P., 1998, NIST thermodynamics and transport properties of refrigerants and Refrigerant Mixtures, REFPROP version 6.0
  12. Maclaine-cross, I. L. and Leonardi., E., 1997, Why hydrocarbons save energy?, Australian AIRAH Journal, Vol. 51, pp.33-37