DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the Estimation Model on Daily Pollutant Loads for the Nakdong River Basin II. Application of the Model

낙동강 유역에 대한 일별 유달부하량 산정모델개발 II. 모델식의 활용

  • Published : 2007.03.28

Abstract

As analyzed the estimated values of the daily delivery loads from thirteen major side streams such as Naesung-river, Keumho-river, Hwang-river, Nam-river during five years (from 1999 to 2003), the daily BOD inflow into the main stream of Nakdong river in 2003 shows the highest quantity as 31.1 ton and the daily BOD inflows in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 are 26.7 ton, 22.5 ton, 21.0 ton, 25.8 ton, respectively. The daily TN in-flow into the main stream of Nakdong river in 2003 shows also the highest quantity as 64.9 ton and the daily TN inflows in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 are 55.19 ton, 46.27 ton, 39.5 ton, 53.38 ton, respectively. The daily TP inflow into the main stream of Nakdong river in 2003 shows the highest quantity as 2.70 ton likewise and the daily TP inflows in 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002 are 2.17 ton, 1.87 ton, 1.60 ton, 2.10 ton, respectively The rate of BOD loads from each side main stream into the main stream of Nakdong river shows that the BOD loads of Keumho-river are the highest as the values range from 32.8 % (2002) ${\sim}$ 35.1 % (2003) and the BOD loads of Nam-river, Naesung-river, Hwang-river are high in the order named. The rate of TN loads to the main stream is also similar to the trend of BOD loads. The contribution of the TN loads of Geumho-river to the contamination of the main stream is also the highest having a range from 27.0 % (2002) to 28.8 % (1999) among the main side streams and the TN loads of Naesung-river, Nam-river, and Heachun-river are high in the order named. The rate of TP loads is quite different from the trend of BOD and TN loads. The TP rate of Keumho-river, however, is still the highest as ranging 58.6 % (2002) to 61.7 % (2003) and the river has the biggest portion (over 50%) of the entire pollution to the main stream of Nakdong river.

Keywords

References

  1. Beasley, D. B., Huggins L. F., Manke E. J., 1980, ANSWERS: A Model for watershed planning, Transaction of the ASAE, 23(4), 938-944 https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34692
  2. Jain, C. K., Bhatia K. K. S., Seth S. M., 1998, Assessment of point and non-point sources of pollution using a chemical mass balance approach, Hydrological Sciences, 43(3), 379-390 https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669809492133
  3. 윤영삼, 유재정, 김문수, 이혜진, 신주남, 양상용, 2003, 낙동강 유역 소수계별 유달부하량 산정 및 평가모델 개발, 낙동강물환경연구소 연구보고서
  4. Yoon Y. S., Kim M. S., Yu J. J., Lee H. J., Lee J. B., Yang S. Y., 2007, Development of the estimation model on daily pollutant loads for the watersheds in the nakdong river basin, I. correction and verification for the model, J. Enviro. Sci., 16(2), 203-210 https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2007.16.2.203
  5. 조태웅, 황동진, 윤영삼, 유재정, 오수태, 정제호, 임태효, 박정민, 서정관, 이재정, 이수형, 김문주, 최병근, 양진영, 이진애, 2001, 낙동강 수계별 오염부하량 조사연구(I), 낙동강물환경연구소 연구보고서, NIER No. 2001 - 35-627
  6. 양상용, 윤영삼, 황동진, 유재정, 오수태, 정제호, 서정관, 박정민, 이재정, 김문수, 이혜진, 임태효, 양진영, 권영호, 조태웅, 2002, 낙동강 수계별 오염부하량 조사연구(II), 낙동강물환경연구소 연구보고서, NIER No. 2002-31-670