Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지

Trends in Patient Satisfaction from 1989-2003: Adjusted for Patient Characteristics

  • Published : 2007.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. To identify trends in patient satisfaction adjusted for sociodemographic factors and health status from 1989-2003. Methods. Five repeated cross-sectional surveys were used. The study sample included 290,534 household members 20 years of age and over from the five survey periods of 1989, 1992, 1995, 1999, and 2003. Satisfaction was measured using a five-point scale, ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied." Crude satisfaction rates, representing the proportion of patients satisfied (very satisfied or satisfied), were calculated for each survey period. Satisfaction rates adjusted for age, sex, marital status, education, and self-rated health status were calculated for each of the five years. Results. Crude satisfaction rates increased from 15.4% in 1989 to 40.5% in 2003. The proportions of satisfaction and dissatisfaction were reversed after 15 years had passed. However, the satisfaction trend was not linear throughout the different years, with 1992 being the year with the lowest satisfaction rate (9.7%). These trends in crude rates did not change even after adjusting for patient characteristics. The odds of satisfaction in 1992 were 38% lower (odds ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.64) than the odds in 1989. In 2003, the odds of satisfaction were 4.01 times (95% CI 3.89 to 4.13) the odds for 1989. Older, female, married, and less-educated people were more likely to be satisfied. Patients who rated their health as 'very good' had the highest satisfaction rate, and those with "neutral" health ratings had the lowest. General hospitals achieved substantial improvement whereas pharmacies became the lowest-rated of all institutions. Conclusions. The Korean health system has achieved better patient satisfaction rates over the past 15 years. Increased health expenditure, resources, and quality improvement efforts may have contributed to this progress.

Keywords

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression: using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute
  2. Blendon, R. J., Kim, M., & Benson, J. M. (2001). The public versus the World Health Organization on health system performance. Health Aff, 20, 10-20
  3. Blendon, R. J., Leitman, R., Morrison, I., & Donelan, K. (1990). Satisfaction with health systems in ten nations. Health Aff, 9, 185-192 https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.9.2.185
  4. Blendon, R. J., Schoen, C., DesRoches, C. M., Osborn, R., Scoles, K. L., & Zapert, K. (2002). Inequalities in health care: A fivecountry survey. Health Aff, 21, 182-191
  5. Cohen, G. (1996). Age and health status in a patient satisfaction survey. Soc Sci Med, 42, 1085-1093 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00315-0
  6. Donelan, K., Blendon, R. J., Schoen, C., Davis, K., & Binns, K. (1999). The cost of health system change: public discontent in five nations. Health Aff, 18,206-216
  7. Goldstein, E., Cleary, P. D., Langwell, K. M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Heller, A. (2001). Medicare managed care CAHPS: A tool for performance improvement. Health Care Financ Rev, 22, 101-107
  8. Hargraves, J. L., Wilson, I. B., Zaslavsky, A., James, C., Walker, J. D., Rogers, G., & Cleary, P. D. (2001). Adjusting for patient characteristics when analyzing reports from patients about hospital care. Med Care, 39, 635-641 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200106000-00011
  9. Kim, C. Y., & Cho, S. H. (2000). Institutionalization of quality improvement programs in Korean hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care, 12,419-423 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/12.5.419
  10. Kim, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Cleary, P. D. (2005). Adjusting Pediatric Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) scores to ensure fair comparison of health plan performances. Med Care, 43, 44-52
  11. Korea National Statistical Office (2003). Report on the Social Statistics Survey 2002. Daejeon, Korea: Author
  12. Korea National Statistical Office (2004). Report on the Social Statistics Survey 2003. Daejeon, Korea: Author
  13. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (1990). Yearbook of Health and Social Statistics 1990. Seoul: Author
  14. Ministry of Health and Welfare (2004). Guidelines for Hospital Evaluation Program. Gwacheon, Korea: Author
  15. National Bureau of Statistics (1989). Social Indicators in Korea 1989. Seoul: Author
  16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003). OECD Reviews of Health Care Systems: Korea. Paris: Author
  17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). OECD Health Data 2005 (CD-ROM). Paris: Author
  18. Perneger, T. V. (2004). Adjustment for patient characteristics in satisfaction surveys. Int J Qual Health Care, 16, 433-435 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh090
  19. Queensland Health (2006). Queensland health state-wide patient satisfction survey. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from The State of Queensland Web site: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/quality/measuredquality.asp
  20. Rahmqvist, M. (2001). Patient satisfaction in relation to age, health status and other background factors: a model for comparisons of care units. Int J Qual Health Care, 13,385-390 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/13.5.385
  21. State Government of Victoria (2004). Victorian patient satisfaction monitor. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from the Victorian State Government Department of Human Services Web site: http://www.health.vic.gov.au/patsat/
  22. World Health Organization (2000). The world health report 2000 health systems: improving performance. Geneva: Author