DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring the Causal Effects of Health Involvement, Attitude, Perceived Behavioral Control and Intention on Seafood Consumption

해산물 소비에 영향을 미치는 건강몰입, 태도, 지각된 행동통제와 행동의도의 인과효과 평가

  • Kang, Jong-Heon (Dept. of Cooking Science, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Ko, Beom-Seok (Dept. of Hotel Culinary Arts & Wine.Coffee, Daegu Health College)
  • 강종헌 (순천대학교 조리과학과) ;
  • 고범석 (대구보건대학 호텔조리음료계열)
  • Published : 2007.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measuring the effects of health involvement, attitude, perceived behavioral control (PBC), behavioral intention on seafood consumption. A total of 235 questionnaires were completed. Structural equation model was used to measure the causal relationships among constructs. Results of the study demonstrated that the structural analysis result for the data also indicated excellent model fit. The direct effect of health involvement on attitude was statistically significant. The direct effects of health involvement, attitude and PBC on consumption were statistically significant. As expected, attitude, PBC and behavioral intention had significant direct effects on consumption. Moreover, health involvement had a significant indirect effect on behavioral intention through attitude and PBC. Health involvement also had a significant indirect effect on consumption through attitude, PBC and behavioral intention. Attitude and PBC had significant indirect effects on consumption through behavioral intention. In conclusion, based on structural analysis, a model was proposed of interrelations among health involvement, attitude, PBC, behavioral intention and seafood consumption. Other variables(sensory variable, habit, norm etc) may be incorporated to form models that consist of new antecedent and consequence pairs.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50: 179-211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Fishbein M, Ajzen J. 1975. Beliefs, attitude, intention, and behavior. In Bernden M, Plligt J (2004) : Ambivalence towards meat. Appetite, 42: 71-78 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00119-3
  3. Furst T, Connors M, Bisogni CA, Sobal J, Falk W. 1996. Food choice: a conceptual model of the process. Appetite, 26: 247-266 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0019
  4. Gempesaw CM, Bacon JR, Wessels, CR, Manalo A. 1995. Consumer perceptions of aquaculture products. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 77: 1306-1312 https://doi.org/10.2307/1243366
  5. Honkanen P, Olsen SO, Verplanken B. 2005. Intention to consume seafood-the importance of habit. Appetite, 45: 161-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.005
  6. Juhl HJ, Poulsen CS. 2000. Antecedents and effects of consumer involvement in fish as a product group. Appetite, 34: 261-267 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2000.0318
  7. Kinnucan HW, Nelson RG, Hiariey J. 1993. U.S. preferences for fish and seafood: an evoked set analysis. Marine Resource Economics 8: 273-291 https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.8.3.42629069
  8. Leek S, Maddock S, Foxall G. 2000. Situational determinants of fish consumption. British Food Journal, 102: 18-39 https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700010310614
  9. Letarte A, Dube L, Troche V. 1997. Similarities and differences in affective and cognitive origins of food likes and dislikes. Appetite, 28: 115-129 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1996.0069
  10. Mahon D, Cowan C, McCarthy M. 2006. The role of attitudes, subjective norm, perceived control and habit in the consumption of ready meals and takeaways in Great Britain. Food Quality and Preference, 17: 474-481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.06.001
  11. Myrland O, Trondsen T, Johnston RS, Lund E. 2000. Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway: lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 11: 169-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00034-8
  12. Olsen SO. 2001. Consumer involvement in seafood as family meals in Norway: an application of the expectancy-value approach. Appetite, 36: 173-186 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0393
  13. Olsen SO. 2003. Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption: the mediating role of attitude, health involvement and convenience. Food Quality and Preference, 14: 199-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00055-1
  14. Roininen K, Lahteenmaki L, Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite, 33: 71-88 https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0232
  15. Trondsen T, Braaten T, Lund E, Eggen AE. 2004. Health and seafood consumption patterns among women aged 45-69 years. Food Quality and Preference, 15: 117-128 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00038-7
  16. Verbeke W, Vackier I. 2005. Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite, 44: 67-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006