DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Dehydrated Food Waste Products on Taiwan Native Chicken (Taishi No. 13)

  • Chen, Kuo-Lung (Department of Animal Science, National Chiayi University) ;
  • Chang, Hwang-Jen (Department of Environmental Engineering, National Chung- Hsing University) ;
  • Yang, Ching-Ke (Department of Animal Science, National Chiayi University) ;
  • You, Shanq-Huei (Department of Animal Science, National Chiayi University) ;
  • Jenq, Horng-Der (Eco Technology & Consultants Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Yu, Bi (Department of Animal Science, National Chiayi University)
  • 투고 : 2006.02.21
  • 심사 : 2006.08.30
  • 발행 : 2007.05.01

초록

The effect of dehydrated food waste product (DFWP) inclusion in diets of Taiwan native chickens on the growth performance, carcass traits, clinical blood chemistry and nutrient digestibility was investigated with 320 male Taishi Native Chickens (Taishi No. 13). They were randomly allocated into four levels of DFWP inclusion (0, 5, 10, or 20%) treatment. Each treatment had 80 chickens with four replicates. At 15 weeks of age, 8 chickens were selected from each group for the nutrient digestibility trial. The results showed that body weight gain during the 0 to 4 week period decreased as the feed intake and feed conversion rate (FCR) increased linearly with increasing level of DFWP inclusion. During the 4 to 8 week period, greater body weight gains were recorded for the birds on the 5% DFWP inclusion level than for the control (p<0.05). During 8 to16 weeks, the feed intake and FCR increased linearly (p<0.05). Interestingly too, results of the carcass analysis showed that DFWP inclusion up to 20% in the diet significantly decreased the relative abdominal fat weight but increased the relative proventriculus and gizzard weights of the birds. However, other carcass parameters, meat quality and sensory scores were not significantly influenced by the dietary DFWP inclusion levels (p>0.05). Higher serum aspartate aminotransferase, ${\gamma}$-glutamyltransferase activity and crude protein digestibility, and lower gross energy digestibility were observed in the 20% DFWP group compared to the control (p<0.05). Dietary DFWP inclusion was inappropriate during the 0 to 4 week period. During 4 to 8 weeks, there was no adverse effect on chicken performance in the 20% group. There was no disadvantage on carcass properties and in the meat panel test. This result would not affect consumer determination.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.
  2. Chae, B. J., S. C. Choi, Y. G. Kim and K. S. Sohn. 2000. Effects of feeding dried food waste on growth and nutrient digestibility in growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1304-1308. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1304
  3. Chen, Y. S. and W. S. Chen. 1995. Colloquium the problem of swill-fed swine. Taiwan Agric. 31:23-27.
  4. Cho, Y. M., G. W. Lee, J. S. Jang, I. S. Shin, K. H. Myung, K. S. Choi, I. H. Bae and C. J. Yang. 2004a. Effects of feeding dried leftover food on growth and body composition of broiler chicks. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:386-393. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.386
  5. Cho, Y. M., I. S. Shin and C. J. Yang. 2004b. Effects of feeding dried leftover food on productivity of laying hens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:518-522. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.518
  6. EPA. 2003. Environmental protection annual of Taiwan. Environmental protection agency. Taipei. Taiwan.
  7. Farhat, A., L. Normand, E. R. Chavez and S. P. Touchburn. 1998. Nutrient digestibility in food waste ingredients for Pekin and Muscovy ducks. Poult. Sci. 77:1371-1376. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.9.1371
  8. Farhat, A., L. Normand, E. R.Chavez and S. P. Touchburn. 2001. Comparison of growth performance, carcass yield and composition, and fatty acid profiles of Pekin and Muscovy ducklings fed diets based on food wastes. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81:107-114. https://doi.org/10.4141/A99-052
  9. FDA. 2004. Food and Drug Regulations. The department of justice Canada, Canada.
  10. Florene, G., C. Touraille, A. Oual, M. Renvere and G. Moni. 1994. Relationships between postmortem pH changes and some traits of sensory quality in veal. Meat Sci. 73:315-325.
  11. Janssen, W. M. M. A. and B. Carr'e. 1989. Influence of fiber on digestibility of poultry feed. In Recent Developments in Poultry Nutrition (Ed. D. J. A. Cole and W. Haresign). Butterworths press, London, pp. 78-93.
  12. Lin, S. T. 1996. Effects of food waste feeding on swine. Taiwan Agric. 32:73-86.
  13. Longstaff, M. and J. M. Mc Nab. 1991. The inhibitory effect of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acid, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 65:199-216. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19910081
  14. Lyon, C. E., B. G. Lyon, C. E. Davis and W. E. Townsend. 1980. Texture profile analysis of patties made from mixed and flakecut mechanically deboned poultry meat. Poult. Sci. 59:69-76. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590069
  15. Moon, J. S., I. K. Kwon and B. J. Chae. 2004. Effects of feeding of diets with or without food waste on growth performance and carcass characteristics in finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:504-510. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.504
  16. Mraz, F. R., R. V. Boucher and M. G. McCartney. 1956. The influence of dietary productive energy and fiber on growth response in chickens. Poult. Sci. 35:1335-1340. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0351335
  17. Myer, R. O., J. H. Brendemuhl and D. D. Johnson. 1999. Evaluation of dehydrated restaurant food waste products as feedstuffs for finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 77:685-692. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.773685x
  18. Rivas, M. E., J. H. Brendemuhl, R. O. Myer and D. D. Johnson. 1995. Chemical composition and digestibility of dehydrated edible restaurant waste (DERW) as a feedstuff for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Supp. 1):177(Abstr.). https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.731177x
  19. SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT. User's Guide: Version 6. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
  20. Scheideler, S. E., D. Aroni and U. Puthpongsiripron. 1998. Strain, fiber source, and enzyme supplementation effects on pullet growth, nutrient utilization, gut morphology, and subsequent layer performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:359-371. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/7.4.359
  21. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York.
  22. Su, C. J., J. C. Hsu and B. Yu. 1996. Effects of dietary crude fiber levels on nutrient utilization of diets in goslings II. Utilization of dry matter, crude fat, gross energy, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 25:129-137.
  23. Wang, C. H. 1992. Plasma and tissue enzyme activities young chickens. J. Chin. Soc. Vet. Sci. 18:132-138.
  24. Westendorf, M. L., Z. C. Dong and P. A. Schoknecht. 1998. Recycled cafeteria food waste as a feed for swine: nutrient content, digestibility, growth and meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2976-298. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76122976x
  25. Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Iisma. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in feces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Free-range Farming on Carcass and Meat Qualities of Black-feathered Taiwan Native Chicken vol.21, pp.8, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80080
  2. The Optimum Dietary Essential Amino Acid Pattern for Male Taiwan Country Chicks vol.22, pp.8, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80642
  3. Turning Food Waste into Value-Added Resources: Current Status and Regulatory Promotion in Taiwan vol.9, pp.5, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050053
  4. “What a Waste”-Can We Improve Sustainability of Food Animal Production Systems by Recycling Food Waste Streams into Animal Feed in an Era of Health, Climate, and Economic Crises? vol.12, pp.17, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177071
  5. Food loss and food waste recovery as animal feed: a systematic review vol.23, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01102-6
  6. Growth response, nutrient digestibility and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens fed dried kitchen waste meal as a partial replacement for corn vol.761, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/761/1/012094
  7. The food for feed concept. Performance of broilers fed hotel food residues vol.62, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2021.1877258
  8. Using dried kitchen food wastes as untraditional feed in growing rabbit's diets vol.45, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00543-9