Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회지)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

Application of Contradiction Analysis for Determination of Product Platform in Mass Customization and Case Study

모순분석을 이용한 대량맞춤에서의 제품 플랫폼 결정 및 적용사례

  • Kim, Kyoung Hee (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Park, Joon Young (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 김경희 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 박준영 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2007.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mass customization meets various needs of customers as well as produces various products and service in low cost like mass production. However, low cost and product diversity have conflicting concepts. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, we need standardization methods. In this paper, we suggest a method for determining the product platform which is a set of common parts in a product family. To achieve the method, we used the Contradiction Analysis of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving), Using this approach, we found a model that obtains various products within limited resources and conditions. Also, we suggest another method that increases the flexibility of our method by Design Structure Matrix.

Keywords

References

  1. Gu, P. H. (1998), Manufacturing Operation Strategies for mass custornization, Journal of the Korean Institution of Industrial Engineers
  2. Hernandez, G et. al, Platform design for customizable products as a problem of access in a geometric space, Engineering Optimization, 35(3), 229-254 https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215031000105013
  3. Kwon, S. Y. (2003), the rise of mass customization and countermeasure CEO Information 415
  4. Lee, K. W. (2001), Theory ofInventive Problem Solving and technical knowledge management, The 6th Knowledge Management Society of Korea Academic Symposium, 111-132
  5. Moreno, Muffatto. (2000), Developing product platforms: analysis of the development process, Technovation 20, 617-630 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00178-9
  6. Park, Y. T. (2005), Application of TRIZ Softwares in Inventive Problem Solving, The Korean Society for quality management contest
  7. Rahul Rai (2003), Modular product family design: agent -based Pareto-optimization and quality loss function-based post-optimal analysis, INT. J. PROD. RES
  8. Selladurai, R. S. (2004), Mass customization in operations management: oxymoron or reality?, Omega 32, 295-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2003.11.007
  9. Sheng, B. and Guoguan, H., Sensitivity and Variability Analysis under Performance Loss Constraints of Product Platform, Engineering Management Conference, 2-4 November, 252-255
  10. Simpson, T. W. and D'souza, B. Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality Within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Application, 12(2), 119-130
  11. Yun, H. S. (2001), Application QFD, TRIZ for conceptual design process model, Journal of the Korean Institution of Industrial Engineers