Prevention of Pressure Ulcer using the Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Based on Braden Scale

Braden Scale에 기초한 욕창발생 위험군 선별도구를 이용한 욕창의 예방

  • Oh, Deuk Young (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea) ;
  • Kim, Jee Hoon (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Paik Kwon (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Sang Tae (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Rhie, Jong Won (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • 오득영 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김지훈 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이백권 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 안상태 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이종원 (가톨릭대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2007.01.30
  • Published : 2007.07.10

Abstract

Purpose: Active prevention is an essential component in reducing the development of pressure sores. For the high-risk patient group, following the certified pressure sore screening scale as well as educating the patient and the nurses who care for them can lead to optimal management of these patients. Applying a risk assessment scale along with a prevention strategy can reduce medical costs and length of stays at the hospital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a new pressure sore risk assessment scale based on the universally recommended Braden scale and our prevention program. Methods: From June to August, 2003, our pressure ulcer risk assessment scale was applied to a total of 1882 patients admitted to the experimental group (intensive care unit, neurosurgery, general surgery, and oncology units). It was based on Braden scale. We analysed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and ROC curve to evaluate its efficacy. Pressure ulcer prevention program was composed of patient's education using protocol and specific nursing care. The incidence of pressure ulcers was also measured during the 3 months period, and those were compared to the control group of 1789 patients from March to May, 2002. Results: 118(6.27%) of the experimental group were high-risk with an incidence of pressure ulcers measuring 4 (0.21%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of our scale were 100%, 94%, 4%, 100%, respectively, and AUC(area under the curve) was 0.992. In the control group, the incidence of pressure ulcers was 11(0.61%). Statistical analyses using chisquared tests with a significance level of 5%, the results were such that ${\chi }^2=3.6482$(p=0.0561). The results proved to be statistically significant in borderline. Conclusion: The results from this study proved that pressure sore risk assessment scale based on Braden scale has an excellent efficacy, and shows that our pressure ulcer prevention program is partially effective in reducing pressure ulcer incidence.

Keywords

References

  1. Pemeger TV, Rae AC, Gaspoz JM, Borst F, Vitek O, Heliot C: Screening for pressure ulcer risk in the acute care hospital: development of a brief bedside scale. J Clin Epidemiol 55: 498, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00514-5
  2. Rosenberg CJ: New checklist for pressure ulcer prevention. J Gerontol Nurs 28: 7, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20020301-04
  3. Kwong E, Pang S, Wong T, Ho J, Shao-ling X, Li-jun T: Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Appl Nurs Res 18: 122, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001
  4. Kim YK: Evaluation of predictive validity for the pressure ulcer risk assessment tool. Nurs Sci 10: 37, 1998
  5. Kim YK: Evaluation of predictive validity for the pressure ulcer risk assessment tool. Nurs Sci 12: 51, 2000
  6. Schoonhoven L, Haalboom JRE, Bousema MT, Algra A, Grobbee DE, Grypdonck MH, Buskens E: Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers. BMJ 325: 797, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7368.797
  7. Bours GJ, Halfen RJ, Berger MP, Huijer Abu-Saad H, Grol RT: Development of a model for case-mix adjustment of pressure ulcer prevalence rates. Med Care 41: 45, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200301000-00008
  8. Choi SJ, Bae SY, Choi JY, Bang HJ: Development and predictive validity of pressure ulcer predicting scale for patients with neurologic condition. Clin Nurs Res 11: 95, 2005
  9. Park HS, Park KY, Yu SM: Factors influencing the development of pressure ulcers in surgical patients. J Korean Acad Nurs 35: 125, 2005
  10. Lee JK: The relationship of risk assessment using Braden scale and development of pressure sore in neurologic intensive care unit. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 15: 267, 2003
  11. Lee YH, Jeong IS, Jeon SS: A comparative study on the predictive validity among pressure ulcer risk assessment scales. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 33: 162, 2003 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2003.33.2.162