Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지

The Impact of Online Communication on Doctor-Patient Relationship: Plastic Surgeon's Perspectives

온라인 커뮤니케이션이 성형외과 의사-환자 관계에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Suk Wha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong Eun (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sun Young (College of Nursing, Seoul National University)
  • 김석화 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김정은 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 이선영 (서울대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2007.08.29
  • Published : 2007.11.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of the study is to identify plastic surgeons' views on the effects of online communication between doctors and patients.Methods: Cross-sectional online survey of members of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons was made to identify their evaluation on the accuracy and the relevance of the internet health information and their perceptions of the effects of discussing the information with the patients on time-efficiency, requests for specific interventions, health outcomes, and the doctor-patient relationship. A questionnaire with 25 items was sent to the surgeons' e-mails, and 111 replied. SPSS Win version 12.0 was used to analyze the statistical differences and meanings among data.Results: The percentage of the plastic surgeons who were experiencing the online communication was 65.8%, and the most frequent medium used was homepage of the clinic/hospital. Even though the percentage of the plastic surgeons who were using the online communication for their everyday practice was high, the percentage of patients who visited the clinic/hospital after using the website of the clinic/hospital was relatively low. The effects of online communication on doctor-patient relationship were neutral in 40(36.0%) and positive in 39(35.1%). The effects on the efficiency of the practice was positive in 45(40.5%), and the effects on the quality of care and the patients' outcome were positive in 46(41.4%) respectively.Conclusion: The ratio of surgeons who are experiencing the online communication is relatively high, whereas the ratio of patients who are using online communication is low. Most of plastic surgeons are positive on the effects of the online communication on doctor-patient relationship, quality of care, and patients' outcome.

Keywords

References

  1. National Internet Development Agency Korea: 2006 Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage. 17, 2007
  2. Mandl KD, Kohane IS, Brandt AM: Electronic patientphysician communication: problems and promise. Ann Intern Med 129: 495, 1998
  3. Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Peterson RN: Using the internet to enhance physician-patient communication. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14: 136, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200603000-00004
  4. alth care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship. Alaska Med 44: 75, 2002
  5. Shactman N: Why doctors hate the Internet. Wired News, http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,35516,00.html: 2000
  6. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, Mctavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, Cella DF, Serlin RC, Apantaku FM, Stewart J & Salner A: Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 16: 435, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x
  7. Taylor H, Leitman R: New data show Internet, Website and email usage by physicians all increasing: security and privacy concerns remain barriers to electronic transfer of clinical information. Health Care News 1: 1, 2001
  8. Kim JE, Kim SW, Shin YJ: Survey on the physicians' views of the effects of internet health information on the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society 21: 279, 2007
  9. Lee K: Directto-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctor-patient relationship. J Am Board Fam Pract 16: 513, 2003 https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.16.6.513
  10. Bloom A: Virtually healthy: the impact of internet on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res 15: 325, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304272916
  11. Anderson JG, Rainey MR, Eysenbach G: The impact of cyber healthcare on the physician-patient relationship. J Med Syst 27: 67, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021061229743
  12. Hardey M: Doctor in the house: the internet as a source of health knowledge and a challenge to expertise. Sociol Health Illn 21: 820, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00185
  13. Gerber BS, Eiser AR: The patient physician relationship in the Internet age: future prospects and the research agenda. J Med Internet Res 3: e15, 2001 https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e15
  14. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW: Patients' use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med 17: 180, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x