구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제23권1호
  • /
  • Pages.31-42
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지

임플란트 보철물의 연결 여부에 따른 유한요소응력분석

Finite Element Analysis on the Supporting Bone according to the Connection Condition of Implant Prosthesis

  • 강재석 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 정제옥 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 이승훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Kang, Jae-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeung, Jei-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2007.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the stress distribution according to the splinting condition and non-splinting conditions on the finite element models of the two units implant prostheses. The finite element model was designed with the parallel placement of two fixtures ($4.0mm{\times}11.5mm$) on the mandibular 1st and 2nd molars. A cemented abutment and gold screw were used for superstructures. A FEA models assumed a state of optimal osseointegration, as the bone quality, inner cancellous bone and outer 2 mm compact bone was designed. This concluded that the cortical and trabecular bone were assumed to be perfectly bonded to the implant. Splinting condition had 2 mm contact surface and non-splinting condition had $8{\mu}m$ gap between two implant prosthesis. Two group (Splinting and non-splinting) were loaded with 200 N magnitude in vertical axis direction and were divided with subdivision group. Subdivision group was composed of three loading point; Center of central fossa, the 2 mm and 4 mm buccal offset point from the central fossa. Von Mises stress value were recorded and compared in the fixture-bone interface and bucco-lingual sections. The results were as follows; 1. In the vertical loading condition of central fossa, splinting condition had shown a different von Mises stress pattern compared to the non-splinting condition, while the maximum von Mises stress was similar. 2. Stresses around abutment screw were more concentrated in the splinting condition than the non-splinting condition. As the distance from central fossa increased, the stress concentration increased around abutment screw. 3. The magnitude of the stress in the cortical bone, fixture, abutment and gold screw were greater with the 4 mm buccal offset loading of the vertical axis than with the central loading.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Solnit, GS. Schneither, RL.. 'An alternative to splinting multiple implants: use of the m system.' J Prothodont 7:114-9, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1998.tb00190.x
  2. Hoshaw, SJ. Brunski, JB. Cochran, GV.. 'Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling.' Int. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9:345-60, 1994
  3. Rangert, B. Jemt, T. Jomeus, L.. 'Forces and moments on Branemark implants.' Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 4:241-7, 1989
  4. Rangert, B. Krogh, PH. Langer, B. Van Roekel, N.. 'Bending overload and implant fracture; a retrospective clinical analysis.' Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 10:326-34, 1995
  5. English, CE.. 'Biomechanical concerns with fixed partial dentures involving implants.' Implant Dent 2:221-42, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199312000-00002
  6. Fischman, B.. 'The rotational aspect of mandibular flexure.' J Prosthet Dent 64:483-5, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90049-I
  7. Hobkirk, JA. Schwab, J.. 'Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseo-integrated implants.' Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6:319-28, 1991
  8. Korioth, TW. Hannam, AG.. 'Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching.' J Dent Res 73:56-66, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730010801
  9. Hemry, PJ. Laney, WR. Jemt, T. Hems, D. Krogh, PH. Polizzi, G. et el.. 'Osseointergrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospctive 5-year multicenter study.' Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 11:450-5, 1996
  10. Laney, WR. Jemt, T. Harris, D. Henry, PJ. Krogh, PH. Polizzi, G. et el.. 'Osseointergrated implants for single tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years.' Int J Oral maxillifac implants 9:49-54, 1994
  11. Scheller, H. Urgell, JP. Kultije, C. Klineberg, I. Goldberg, PV. StevensonMoore, P. et el.. 'A 5-years multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations.' Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 13:212-8, 1998
  12. Skalak, R.. 'Biomechanical consideration I osseointergrated prostheses.' J Prosthet Dent 49:843-8, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  13. Quirynen, M. Naert, I. van Steenberghe, D.. 'Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system.' Clin Oral Implants Res 3:104-11, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030302.x
  14. Guichet, DL. Yoshinobu, D. Caputo, AA.. 'Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations.' J. Prosthet Dent 87:528-35, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124589
  15. Hong, SY. Lisa, AL. David, AF.. 'Finite element stress analysis on the effect of splinting in fixed partial dentures.' J Prosthet Dent 81:721-8, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70113-7
  16. Ebrashi, MK. Craig, RG. Peyton, FA.. 'Experimental stress analysis of fixed partial dentures.' J. Prosthet Dent 23:177-86, 1970 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(70)90295-7
  17. Kregzde, M.. 'A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis.' Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:662-73, 1993
  18. Landry, KE. Johnson, PF. Parks, VI. Pelleu, GB.. 'A photoelastic study to determine the location of the nonrigid connector in a five-unit intermediate abutment prosthesis.' J Prosthet Dent 57:454-7 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90014-X
  19. Davidoff, SR.. 'Restorative-based treatment planning: determining adequate support for implant-retained fixed restorations.' Implant Dent 5: 179-84, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199600530-00005
  20. Stegaroiu, R. Sato, T. Kuskari, I. Miyakawa, O .. 'Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.' Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:82-90, 1987
  21. Clift, SE. Fisher, J. Watson, CJ.. 'Finite element stress and strain analysis of the bone surrounding a dental implant; effect of variations in bone modulus.' Proc Inst Mech Eng[H] 206:233-41, 1992
  22. Weinberg, LA.. 'Force distribution in splinted anterior teeth.' Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 10:484-94, 1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(57)90007-5
  23. Weinberg, LA.. 'Force distribution in splinted posterior teeth.' Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 10:1268-76, 1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80025-5
  24. Rho, JY. Ashman, RB. Tumer, CH.. 'Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements.' J Biomech 26: 111-9, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D