한국어류학회지 (Korean Journal of Ichthyology)

  • 제19권4호
  • /
  • Pages.274-285
  • /
  • 2007
  • /
  • 1225-8598(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3371(eISSN)
한국어류학회 (The Ichthyological Society of Korea)
권호 표지

DNA 생물정보를 이용한 한국산 자리돔과 어류의 분류 및 분자계통학적 위치

Species Identification and Molecular Phylogenetic Position of Korean Damselfishes (Pomacentridae: Chrominae) Based on DNA Bioinformation

  • Koh, Jeong Rack (Fisheries Resources Restoration Development and Management Center, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute (NFRDI)) ;
  • Park, Yung Chul (Research Institute of EcoScience, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2007.10.01
  • 심사 : 2007.11.28
  • 발행 : 2007.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

자리돔과(Teleostei: Pomacentridae) 어류는 열대 및 아열대 해역에 널리 분포하고 있으며 특히 산호해역의 해양생물 군락을 이루는 주요구성 어류이다. 현재 우리나라에는 본과에 5종이 분포하는 것으로 알려져 있는데 본 논문에서는 genus Chromis와 Dascyllus 2속을 대상으로 분자계통학적 위치를 규명하는데 그 목적이 있다. 분자계통분석에서 일본산 D. aruanus는 계통도상에서 폴리네시아산 D. aruanus와 함께 유집되었고, 우리나라의 Chromis fumea는 호주의 C. nitida와 함께 유집되었으며, 두 종간의 유전적 거리를 표시하는 P 값은 0.047로 상대적으로 매우 낮았다. 우리나라의 C. notatus는 뉴칼레도니아산 C. flavomaculata와 함께 유집되었는데, 특히 제주의 D. melanurus와 인도-태평양의 D. melanurus 사이에는 유전자 염기서열의 차이가 전혀 관찰되지 않았다. 그러나 이 두 지역의 D. melanurs와 인도네시아의 D. melanurus간에는 한개의 염기서열 차이가 있었다. 일본산 Dascyllus aruanus의 염기서열은 폴리네시아산 Dascyllus aruanus와 2개의 염기서열 차이가 있었고, 한국산 Chromis fumea와 C. notatus 사이에는 다소 많은 수의 염기서열 차이가 있었다. 본 논문에서 도입한 미토콘드리아 cytochrome DNA의 염기서열 정보 및 분석은 이 유전자가 종 수준에서 뿐만 아니라 지역집단의 구분 및 확인을 위한 DNA 바코드로서 이용될 수 있음을 보여준다.

The subfamily Chrominae of damselfishes (Teleostei: Pomacentridae) includes the genus Chromis and Dascyllus. They are found throughout the tropical oceans and form a major component of coral reef communities. There are 5 species of the Chrominae currently recognized in Korea. This study was conducted to infer phylogenetic position of two Korean Chromis species and one Dascyllus species within general category of their each genus in worldwide level. This study also includes one species of Japanese Dascyllus. In the phylogenetic analysis, the Japanese D. aruanus grouped with D. aruanus previously reported from French Polynesia. Korean Chromis fumea grouped with Australian C. nitida and the p-distance value between the two species is relatively very low (0.047). Korean C. notatus grouped together with C. flavomaculata (New Caledonia). In the sequence analysis of some Korean and Japanese damselfishes, there was no sequence variation between D. melanurus (Jeju, Korea) and D. melanurus (Indo-Pacific), but the sequences of the two populations were different in only one nucleotide sites from that of D. melanurus in Indonesian Archipelago. The sequences of Dascyllus aruanus (Japan) were different in two nucleotide sites from it in French Polynesia. There were high difference between the sequences of two Korean species, Chromis fumea and Korean C. notatus. The variations among mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences indicate that the gene sequence could be used as DNA barcode for identification of local populations of D. aruaus and D. melanurus as well as species level.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : NFRDI (National Fisheries Research and Development Institute)

참고문헌

  1. Kim, I.S., Y. Choi, C.L. Lee, Y.J. Lee and B.J. Kim. 2005. Illustrated book of Korean fishes. Kyo Hak Pub. Co., Seoul. pp. 615 (In Korean)
  2. llen, G.R. 1975. Damselfishes of the South Seas. T. F. H. Publications, Neptune City, NJ
  3. Allen, G.R. 1991. Damselfishes of the World. Mergus Publishers, Germany.
  4. Bernardi, G. and N.L. Crane. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the Humbug Damselfishes (Dascyllus, Pomacentridae) inferred from mtDNA sequences. J. Fish Biol., 54 :1210-1217 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb02049.x
  5. Elliott, J.K., S.C. Lougheed, B. Bateman, L.K. McPhee and P.T. Boag. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for the evolution of specialization in anemonefishes. Proc. R. Soc., Lond., 266 : 677-685
  6. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol., 17 :368-376 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734359
  7. Godwin, J. 1995. Phylogenetic and habitat influences on the mating system structure in the humbug damselfishes (Dascyllus, Pomacentridae). Bull. Marine Sci., 57 : 637-652
  8. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino and T. Yano. 1985. Dating the humanape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol., 22 : 160-174 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02101694
  9. Hobson, E.S. 1974. Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona. Hawaii Fish Bull., 72 : 915-1031
  10. Huelsenbeck, J.P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES. Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17 : 754-755 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
  11. Jang-Liaw, N.H., K.L. Tang, C.F. Hui and K.T. Shao. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of 48 species of damselfishes (Perciformes: Pomacentridae) using 12S mtDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 25 : 445-454 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00278-6
  12. Johns, G.C and G.N. Somero. 2004. Evolutionary Convergence in Adaptation of Proteins to Temperature: A4-Lactate Dehydrogenases of Pacific Damselfishes (Chromis spp.) Mol. Biol. Evol., 21 : 314-320 https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh021
  13. Johnson, G.D. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: progress and problems. Bull. Mar. Sci., 52 : 3-28
  14. Jukes, T.H. and C.R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HM ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York: Academic Press, 21-132
  15. Kaufman, L.S. and K.F. Liem. 1982. Fishes of the suborder Labroidei (Pisces: Perciformes): phylogeny, ecology, and evolutionary significance. Breviora, 472 : 1-19
  16. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol., 16 : 111-120 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  17. Koh, J.R., J.G. Myung and Y.U. Kim. 1997. Morphological study on the fishes of the Family Pomacentridae. I. A taxonomical revision of the Family Pomacentridae (Pisces; Perciformes) from Korea. Korean J. Syst. Zoo., 13 :173-192
  18. Larson, B.M.H. 2007. DNA barcoding: the social frontier. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5 : 8-437 https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[w8:DADSII]2.0.CO;2
  19. Nelson, J.S. 1994. Fishes of the World, third ed. Wiley, New York.
  20. Palumbi, S.R. 1996. Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK ed. Molecular Systematics. MA: Sinauer Associates, 205-247
  21. Park, Y.C., K. Maekawa, T. Matsumoto, R. Santoni and J.C. Choe. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the Korean woodroaches Cryptocercus spp. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 30 : 450-464 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00220-3
  22. Quenouille, B., E. Bermingham and S. Planes. 2004. Molecular systematics of the damselfishes (Teleostei: Pomacentridae): Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 31 : 66-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00278-1
  23. Randall, J.E. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of the West Indies. Stud. Trop. Oceanog., 5 : 655-847
  24. Planes, S., F. Bonhomme and R. Galzin. 1993. Genetic structure of Dascyllus aruanus populations in French Polynesia. Marine Biol., 117 : 665-674 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349779
  25. Rosen, D.E. and C. Patterson. 1990. On Muller's and Cuvier's concepts of pharyngognath and labyrinth fishes and the classification of percomorph fishes, with an atlas of percomporph dorsal gill arches. Am. Mus. Nov., 2983 : 1-57
  26. Posada, D. and K.A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14 : 817-818 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
  27. Rambaut, A. 1996. Se-Al: Sequence Alignment Editor. Available at http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/
  28. Randall, H.A. and G.R. Allen. 1977. A revision of the damselfish genus Dascyllus (Pomacentridae) with description of a new species. Res. Austral. Mus., 31 : 349-385 https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.31.1977.217
  29. Randall, J.E. and H.A. Randall. 2001, Dascyllus auripinnis, a New Pomacentrid Fish from Atolls of the Central Pacific Ocean. Zool. Stud., 40 : 61-67
  30. Stiassny, M.L.J. and J.S. Jensen. 1987. Labroid interrelationships revisited: morphological complexity, key innovations, and the study of comparative diversity. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 151 : 269-319
  31. Streelman, J.T. and S.A. Karl. 1997. Reconstructing labroid evolution with singlecopy nuclear DNA. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 264 : 1011-1020
  32. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
  33. Tang, K.L. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among damselfishes (Teleostei: Pomacentridae) as determined by mitochondrial DNA data. Copeia, 3 : 591-601
  34. Tompson, J.D., T.J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin and D.G. Higgins. 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res., 25 : 4879-4882
  35. Yang, Z., N. Goldman and A. Friday. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximumlikelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol., 11 :316-324