Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지

Robust Design Methodology under Design Constraints

기술적 설계제약을 고려한 강건설계법

  • Kim, Kyung-Mo (School of Advanced Materials and Systems Engineering Kumoh National University of Technology)
  • 김경모 (금오공과대학교 신소재시스템공학부(산업시스템공학))
  • Published : 2007.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A multi-attribute robust design methodology is presented. This method can be applied where there are various technical constraints in design variables, multiple potentially conflicting design attributes, and uncontrollable noise variables. Two forms of technical constraints, soft and hard constraints, are considered in robust design settings. Specifically, this work presents procedures for integrating two types of design constraints seamlessly on the multiple design attributes, which is achieved through a development of multi-attribute utility formulation. The effectiveness of the overall procedures is tested with the aid of an I-Beam design problem, and results of sensitivity analysis are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Ames, A. E., Mattucci, N., MacDonald, S., Szonyi, G. and Hawkins, D. M. (1997), 'Quality Loss Functions for Optimization Across Multiple Response Surfaces', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 29, pp. 339-346 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1997.11979775
  2. Del Castillo, E. and Montgomery, D. C. (1993), 'A Nonlinear Programming Solution to the Dual Response Problem', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 25, pp. 199-204 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1993.11979454
  3. Del Castillo, E., Montgomery, D. C. and McCarville, D. R. (1996), 'Modified Desirability Functions for Multiple Response Optimization', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 28, pp. 337-345 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1996.11979684
  4. Derringer, G. and Suich, R. (1980), 'Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, pp, 214-219 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
  5. Fichitali, J., Van De Voort, F. R. and Khuri, A. I. (1990) , 'Multiresponse Optimization of Acid Casein Production', Journal of Food Process Engineering, Vol. 12, pp. 247-258 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.1990.tb00053.x
  6. Fischer, G. W. (1979), 'Utility Models for Multiple Objective Decisions : Do They Accurately Represent Human Preferences?', Decision Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 451-479 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00037.x
  7. Gold, S. and Krishnamurty, S (1997), 'Trade -offs in Robust Engineering Design', Proceedings of ASME-DETC'97, Sacramento, CA, pp. 1-8
  8. Harrington, E. C., Jr. (1965), 'The D -esirability Function', Industrial Quality Control, Vol. 21, pp. 494-498
  9. Hazerlrigg, G. A. (1996), 'Systems E -ngineering : A New Framework for Engineering Design' , American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dynamic System and Control Division, Vol. 60, pp. 39-46
  10. Iyer, H. V. and Krishnamurty, S. (1998), 'A Preference-Based Robust Design Metric', Proceedings of 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, DETC98/DAC-5625
  11. Keeney, R' L. and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives : Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc., NY
  12. Khuri, A. I. and Conlon, M. (1981), 'Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression Functions' , Technometrics, Vol. 23, pp, 363-375 https://doi.org/10.2307/1268226
  13. Lind, E. E., Goldin, J. and Hickman, J. B. (1960), 'Fitting Yield and Cost Response Surfaces', Chem. Eng. Prog., Vol. 56, pp. 62-68
  14. Messac, A. (1996), 'Physical Program -ming : Effective Optimization for Computational Design', AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, pp, 149-158 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13035
  15. Mira-Quesada, G. and Del Castillo, E. (2004). 'Two Approaches for Improving the Dual Response Method in Robust Parameter Design' , Journal of Quality Technology. Vol. 36. pp, 154-168 https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2004.11980262
  16. Olson. D. L. and Moshkovich, H. M. (1995), 'Consistency and Accuracy in Decision Aids : Experiments with Four Multiattribute Systems' , Decision Sciences, Vol. 26, No.6, pp. 723-748 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01573.x
  17. Otto, K. N. and Antonsson, E. K. (1991), 'Trade-Off Strategies in Engineering Design' , Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3, pp. 87-103 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581342
  18. Phadke, M S. (989), Quality Engin -eering Using Robust Design, Prentice Hall, NJ
  19. Thurston, D. L. (1991), 'A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes' , Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 3, pp. 105-122 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581343
  20. Yang, J. B. and Sen P. (1996), 'Preference Modeling by Estimating Local Utility Functions for Multiobjective Optimization' , European Journal of Operational Research, pp. 115-138