Recognition of a Housewife for Rearing-related Supports of a Husband and its Relationship with Mental Health -Comparison between Korea and Japan -

남편의 육아지원에 대한 부인의 인지와 정신적 건강과의 관련성 - 한국과 일본의 비교 -

  • Park, Chun-Man (Department of Public Health, Keimyung University) ;
  • Okada, Setsuko (School of Health and Social welfare, Woosong University)
  • Published : 2007.10.30

Abstract

To commonly apply the ${\ulcorner}$Measurement parameter for housewives for rearing-related supports of a husband${\lrcorner}$ in Korea and Japan, the current study conducted to confirm the relationship between recognition of a housewife for rearing-related supports of a husband and mental health after reviewing the appropriateness of the parameter. For the statistical analysis, 829 married Korean women in D city and 1,302 Japanese women in S city having children before entering a school were subjected for the study. For reviewing the appropriateness of the parameter, the simultaneous factor analysis that adopted the structural equation modeling was used. As the result of the analysis, 10 categories of factor structural model comprising the ${\ulcorner}$Recognition of a housewife for rearing-related supports of a husband${\lrcorner}$ resulted with the secondary model which sets of ${\ulcorner}$Recognition for emotional support${\lrcorner}$, ${\ulcorner}$Recognition for instrumental support${\lrcorner}$ and ${\ulcorner}$Recognition for information support${\lrcorner}$ as the primary factor and ${\ulcorner}$Recognition of a housewife for rearing-related supports of a husband${\lrcorner}$ as the secondary factor, and the model was found to be appropriate for the data in Korea and Japan. The result is considered to prove the constructs validity of ${\ulcorner}$Recognition of a housewife for rearing-related supports of a husband${\lrcorner}$ parameter. In addition, the relationship between ${\ulcorner}$Recognition of a housewife for rearing-related supports of a husband${\lrcorner}$ and mental health(GHQ) was reviewed by using multiple indicator model, and found the similarity of Korean and Japanese data. The scores measured by using the above parameter resulted to show high relationship with educational level of housewife, family configuration, and number of children.

Keywords

References

  1. 관계부처합동. 저출산$\cdot$고령사회기본계획시안. 서울: 관계부처합동, 2006
  2. 김승권. 한국 가족의 변화와 대응방안. 서울: 한국보건사회연구원, 2000
  3. 김승권, 조애저, 이삼식, 김유경, 송인주. 2000년 전국 출산력 및 가족보건실태조사 보고. 서울: 한국보건사회연구원, 2006
  4. 통계청. 장래의 인구추계. 서울: 통계청, 2007
  5. 한국보건사회연구원. 한국의 보건복지백서. 서울:한국보건사회연구원, 2002
  6. 国立女性教育会館. 家庭教育に関する国際比較調査. 東京: 日本女性学習財団, 2006
  7. 岡田節子, 朴千萬, 嚴基郁, 中嶋和夫. 育兒に起因する母親のバーンアウト. 靜岡縣立大學短期大學部硏究紀要, 2002;15:179-187
  8. 網野武博. 多樣化する子育て支援のニーズとその對應. 周産期醫學, 1993;23(6):857-860
  9. 狩野裕. グラフィカル多變量解析─目で見る共分散構造分析. 東京: 現代數學社, 1997
  10. 田中宏二, 難波茂美. 育兒ストレスにおけるソーシャル․サポート硏究の槪觀. 岡山大學敎育學部硏究集錄 1997;104:177-185
  11. 中嶋和夫, 桑田寬子, 林仁實, 岡田節子, 朴千萬, 齋藤友介, 間三千夫. 父親の育兒サポートに關する母親の認知. 厚生の指標, 2000;47(15):1-8
  12. 中嶋和夫, 齋藤友介, 岡田節子. 母親の育兒負擔感に關する尺度化. 厚生の指標, 1999;46(3):11-18
  13. 川井尙. 育兒における父親の役割. 小兒保健硏究, 1992;51(6):671-678
  14. 厚生勞働省. 平成13年度版厚生勞働白書: 生涯にわたり個人の自立を支援する厚生勞働行政. 東京: ぎょうせい, 2001
  15. 厚生省. 平成10年度版厚生白書: 子どもを産み育てることに '夢' を持てる社會を. 東京: ぎょうせい, 1998
  16. 厚生統計協會. 國民福祉の動向. 東京: 厚生統計協會, 2003
  17. Anderson PA, Teleen SL. The relationship between social support and maternal behaviors and attitudes: A metaanalytic review. Am J Community Psychol, 1992;20(6):753-774 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01312606
  18. Arbuckle JL. Amos user's guide version3.6. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation, 1997
  19. Folkman S. Personal control and stress and coping processes: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984;46(4):839-852 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.839
  20. Gjerdingen DK, Olmsted MP, Garner DM. The effects of social support on women's health during pregancy, labor and delivery, and the postpartum period. Family Medicine Special Articles, 1991;23(5):370-375
  21. Goldenberg DP and Hiller VF: A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 1979;9:139-145 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644
  22. Hopkins J, Marucus M, Cambell B. Postpartum depression: A critical review. Psychol Bull, 1984;95(3): 498-515 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.498
  23. House JS, Robbins C, Metzner HL. The association of social relationships and activities with mortality. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982;116: 123-140 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113387
  24. Joreskog KG. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometorika, 1971;36(4):409-426 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366
  25. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transaction theory and research on emotions as coping, Eur J Pers, 1987;1:141-169 https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304
  26. Lazarus RS, Smith CA. Knowledge and appraisal in the cognition-emotion relationship. Cog Emo, 1988;2:281-300 https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938808412701
  27. Yung YF, Bentler PM. Bootstrap-corrected ADF test statistics. Br J Math Stat Psychol, 1994;47:63-84 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1994.tb01025.x