DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Digital Games Based on Historical Material and its Design Components - With History Based Games of 5 Countries

역사소재 기반 디지털게임의 발전과정 및 기획요소 연구 - 동.서양 5개국의 역사소재 게임을 중심으로

  • Moon, Man-Ki (The Graduate School of Advanced Imaging Science, Multimedia & Film. Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Yong (The Graduate School of Advanced Imaging Science, Multimedia & Film. Chung-Ang University)
  • 문만기 (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원) ;
  • 김태용 (중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원)
  • Published : 2007.09.29

Abstract

When culture took large part in industrial area, every country has tried to utilize own cultural contents for educational or commercial purpose and the various cultures and histories are recognized as a main concept or subject so that a number of scholars who study history increase. In video game field, special characteristics of interface that audiences participate in the game to complete story-telling is considered as efficient material for learning process. As observed above, it is important to analyze the games that every country makes and export to the world in which the video games is understood as a play of human in general. This Paper has firstly analyzed the most favorite historical games developed in Korea, the USA, Japan, Taiwan and Germany from 1980 to 2005 and secondly, compared that wars and historical origin appears in game scenario, a world view and background story and finally after point out the preferable era and genre of the countries then propose the promising way of design for historical video games. In the process of analysis of a view and heroes in historical games, we compared the real persons, the real historical events and novel in which 11.8% only employed the real persons in 8 out of 68 games. Also the real history and background story are appeared in 37 games which is 54.4% of them. We discovered that the main material that is popular for each country is the historical backing rather than real persons where the favorite historical background is chosen at which they are proud of; 3-Throne era with strong ancient Gogurye for Korea, the 1st and 2nd World Wars and the Independence War for the USA, the tide of war around Middle age for Japan, ancient history of Europe for Germany. The favorite age for video games is Ancient times with 37 games for 54.4%, Middle Age with 7 games fer 10.3%, the prehistoric age with 5 games for 7.35%, remote age with 1 for 1.47%, while current historical games favor Ancient or Modern Age.

References

  1. Douglas, Baron Isherwood, The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption, New York: W.W. Northon and Co,1978
  2. Rodman, Margaret C. and Jean- Marc Philibert. 'Rethinking Consumption: some Problems Concerning The Practice of Objects in the Third World,' paper presented at the Canadian Ethnological Society Meetings, University of Toronto, 11 May 1985
  3. William, L. 'Things Come Alive: Economy and Technology as Modes of Social Representation in Modem Society,' paper presented at Table Ronde Internationale sur les Representations, Montreal, October, 1983
  4. William, L. Stephen Kline, and Sut Jhally, Social Communication in Advertising, New York: Methuen, 1986
  5. Marc Prensky. Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill, 2001, p.394
  6. Romiszowski, A. & Mason, R. Computer-mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen(Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.1996
  7. Gagne, R, The conditions of Learning (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1985), 1990
  8. Pike. B & Busse, C. 101 More Games for Trainers(Minneapolis: Lakewood Books),1995, p.63
  9. Brown, E. Conversation in cyberspace: A study of online learning, Open Learning vol.18 (3),2003, pp. 245 - 259 https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051032000131017
  10. Perkins. D. N. Technology meets constructivism. Educational Technology, May,1991a, pp18-23
  11. Perkins. D. N. Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 31(5),1991b, pp.18-23
  12. Prensky, M. Digital game-based learning, McGraw-Hill, USA,2001
  13. Snodgrass, A. Hermeneutics and the Application of Design Rules, Gadamer, Action and Reason, Department of Architecture and Design Science, University of Sydney, 1991
  14. Huizinga, J. Homo Ludens-Astudy of the play Element in Culture, The Beacon Press, Boston,1938
  15. Callois, R. Les Jeux et les Hommers. Paris: Gallimard, 1958
  16. Bolter, Jay David. Writing Space: The Computer in the History of Literacy. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989
  17. Colby, Kenneth Mark, and J. P. Gilberte. 'Programming a Computer Model of Neurosis.' Journal of Mathematical Psychology vol.1, 1964, pp.405-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(64)90012-4
  18. Colby, Kenneth Mark. Artifical Paranoia: A Computer Simulation of Paranoid Process. New York: Pergamon Press,1975
  19. Dyer, Gillia, Advertising as Communication, New York: Methuen, 1982
  20. McCraken, Grant. 'Anthropology and the Study of Advertising: A Critical Review of Selected Literature', Working Paper pp.84-103 in the University of Guelph, Department of Consumer Studies, Working Paper Series,1980
  21. Sherry, John F. Jr. 'Gift-Giving in Anthropological Perspective,' Journal of Consumer Research, vol.10(2September), 1983, pp.157-168 https://doi.org/10.1086/208956
  22. Sherry, 'Advertising as a Cultural System,' paper presented at the 1985 American Marketing Association Educators' Conference, Phoenix, Arizona,1985
  23. Williamson, Judith. Decoding Advertising, New York: Marion Boyars, 1978
  24. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of thought and action: A social congnitive theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ,1986
  25. Bandura, A . Self-efficacy: the foundation of agency, Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness, 2000, pp.17-33
  26. Bandura, A . Social cognitive theory of mass communication, Media Psychology vol.3, 2001, pp. 265-299 https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher Psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. Jhon-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman(Eds,). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978
  28. Vygotsky, L. S , The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch(Ed), The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology (pp.144-188). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe,1981
  29. Vygotsky, L.S Thonght and langnage. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. (Original work pnblished 1934), 1962, 1986
  30. Cobb,P., & Yackel,E. Constructivist, emergent, and sociocnltnral perspectives in the context of developmental research. Edncational Psychologist, vol.31,1996, pp.175-190 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3103&4_3
  31. Muray, Janet H. 'The Pedagogy of Cyberspace: Teaching a Conrse in Reading and Writing Interactive Fiction.' In Contextnal Media, Edward Barrett, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994
  32. Dewey. J. Experience and Edncation. New York: Collier Books,(1963/1938)
  33. Dewey. J. How we Think (Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Company).1993
  34. Piaget, J. play, Dreams and Imitation on Childhood. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1962, 2001;Petty&Cacioppo, 1986
  35. Piaget, J , Structnralism, transed. by C. Maschler. New York: Basic Books, Inc,1970
  36. Campos, M. A constructivist method for the analysis of networked cognitive commnnication and the assessment of collaborative learning and knowledge bnilding, JALN 8(2), 2004 (Retrieved February 20, 2005, from http:// www. sloan-c.org /pnblications/ jaln/v8n2/index.asp)
  37. Harasim, L. Online edncation. In L. Harasim, Online Edncation(ed.), 1990, pp.137-183.NY: Praeger
  38. Lebowitz, Michael. 'Story-Telling as Planning and Learning.' vol.14,1985, pp.483-502 https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(85)90015-4
  39. McComb, M. Angmenting a gronp discnssion conrse with compnter-mediated commnnication in a small college setting. Interpersonal Compnting and Technology Jonrual,vol.1(3), 1993
  40. Baranowski,T. & Cnllen,K. et al., Are cnrrent health behavioral change model helpfnl in gniding prevention of weight gain effort?, Obesity Research Snpplement, 2003, pp.23-43
  41. Vattimo, G. The transparent society. Translated by D. Webb, Cambrige: Polity. 1989
  42. Arnheim, R. Visnal Thinking, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969, p.140
  43. Cohen, L. Manion and K. Morrison, et al., Research methods in edncation (5th ed.), Rontledge Falmer, London,2000
  44. Burns, R. B. Introdnction to research methods (2nd ed), Longman Cheshire, Melbonrne.1994
  45. Jonassen, D .H.(1995). Snpporting commnnities of learning with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Edncational technology, vol.35(4), pp.60-63
  46. Jonassen, D. H,(1997) Instructional design models for well-structnred and Ill-structnred Problem-solving learning ontcomes. Edncational technology: Research of Development, vol.45(1), pp.65-94 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
  47. Dick, W. Better instructional design theory: process improvement or reengin eering? Edncational Technology, September- October, 1997,pp.47-50
  48. Driscoll, M.P. Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,1994
  49. Abrams, P. Historical Sociology (london,1982)
  50. Kennedy ,D. 'Imperial History and Post-Colonial Theory' Jonmal of Imperial and Commonwealtb History, vol. 24, 1996, pp.345-363 https://doi.org/10.1080/03086539608582983
  51. Alex Callinicos, Theories and Narrtives, 박형신/박선권 옮김, '이론과 서사', 일신사, 1997
  52. David Cannadine, What is History Now?, 문화사회학회 공역, '굿바이 E.H.카'. 푸른역사,2006
  53. 문만기, 디지털 콘텐츠 제작과정에서 한국, 미국,일본의 원소스멀티유스(One-Source Multi-Use)적용방식 비교 연구,인문콘텐츠학회, vol. 8 pp. 239-258, 2006