DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Methoxyfenozide and Bentazone in Plant with HPLC by pH-Adjusted Liquid-liquid Partition Cleanup

pH조절 분배추출에 의한 식물체 중 Methoxyfenozide와 Bentazone의 HPLC 분석

  • Lo, Seog-Cho (Division of Bio-Environmental Science, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Hwang, Cheol-Hwan (Division of Bio-Environmental Science, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Yoo, Ki-Yong (Division of Bio-Environmental Science, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Han, Seong-Soo (Division of Bio-Environmental Science, Wonkwang University)
  • 노석초 (원광대학교 생명환경학부) ;
  • 황철환 (원광대학교 생명환경학부) ;
  • 유기용 (원광대학교 생명환경학부) ;
  • 한성수 (원광대학교 생명환경학부)
  • Published : 2007.09.30

Abstract

This study was performed to enhance the cleanup efficiency of methoxyfenozide and bentazone by pH adjustment in the course of liquid-liquid partition and to develop an optimum analytical conditions using HPLC coupled with DAD for two matrices, brown rice and rice straw. Preparation procedure of brown rice sample was "extraction${\rightarrow}$coagulation${\rightarrow}$liquid-liquid partition$\rightarrow$-florisil C.C", and this procedure was samely applied to two compounds. In rice straw, preparation procedure of methoxyfenozide sample was "extraction$\rightarrow$-alkalization$\rightarrow$liquid-liquid extraction$\rightarrow$coagulation$\rightarrow$florisil C.C", and in the case of bentazone, "extraction$\rightarrow$alkalization$\rightarrow$liquid-liquid partition$\rightarrow$acidification$\rightarrow$liquid-liquid extraction$\rightarrow$florisil C.C". All these purified samples were redissolved in the mobile phases, acetonitile : 20 mM sodium acetate (75:25, v/v) for methoxyfenozide and acetonitrile : 75 mM sodium acetate, pH 6.0 (40:60, v/v) for bentazone. Recoveries of methoxyfenozide analysis in brown rice and rice straw were 83.5-97.4 and 86.4-97.3%, and detection limits were 0.02 and 0.04 mg/kg, respectively. Recoveries of bentazone in brown rice and rice straw were 86.8-101.9 and 88.3-94.5% and detection limits were 0.005 and 0.01 mg/kg, respectively. This methods seem to be usefully applied to the residue analysis of two compounds in the view of producing stable analytical condition and fair reproducibility.

이 연구는 액액분배과정 중 pH 조절에 의한 diacylhyazine계의 곤충생장조정(IGR)계 살충제 methoxyfenozide와 benzothiadiazinone계의 제초제 bentazone의 분배효율을 향상시키기 위하여 수행하였다. 현미시료는 두 약제 모두 "추출$\rightarrow$응고법$\rightarrow$분배추출$\rightarrow$florisil column chromatography"의 동일한 과정을 거쳤다. 볏짚시료에 있어서 methoxyfenozide는 "추출$\rightarrow$1 M-NaOH 용액에 의한 알칼리화$\rightarrow$분배추출$\rightarrow$응고법$\rightarrow$florisil column chromatography"의 과정을 거친 후 용리액인 acetonitrile : 20 mM sodium acetate(75:25, v/v)로 정용, HPLC로 분석하였다. Bentazone의 경우는 "추출$\rightarrow$1 M-NaOH 용액 첨가에 의한 알칼리화$\rightarrow$유기용매 세척$\rightarrow$12 M-HCl 의한 산성화$\rightarrow$분배추출$\rightarrow$florisil column chromatography"의 과정을 거쳤으며, acetonitrile : 75 mM sodium acetate(pH 6.0) (40:60, v/v)로 정용, HPLC로 분석 하였다. Methoxyfenozide의 회수율은 현미 83.5-97.4%, 볏짚 86.4-97.3%였으며, 분석법의 검출한계는 현미 0.02 mg/kg 볏짚 0.04 mg/kg이었다. Bentazone의 회수율은 현미 86.8-101.9 %, 볏짚 88.3-94.5%였으며, 분석법의 검출한계는 현미 0.005 mg/kg, 볏짚 0.01 mg/kg이었다. 본 연구결과에서 얻은 위 방법은 재현성 있는 안정적 분석조건을 제공한다는 점에서 두 약제의 잔류분석에 유용하게 적용될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tomlin, C. D. S. (2000) The pesticide manual 12th edition, The British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, United Kingdom, p. 624
  2. Smagghe, G., Carton, B., Wesemael, W., Ishaaya, I. and Tirry, L. (1999) Ecdysone agonists -Mechanism of action and application on spodoptera species, Pesti. Sci. 55, 386-389 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9063(199903)55:3<386::AID-PS922>3.0.CO;2-5
  3. Korea Crop Protection Council (2005) Pesticides application manual, Seoul, Korea, pp. 366-670
  4. Tomlin, C. D. S. (2000) The pesticide manual 12th edition, The British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, United Kingdom p. 80
  5. Kim, K. U. (1998) Principles of weed science, Kyungpook university press, Korea, p. 221
  6. Choi, B. K., Hercules, D. M and Gusev, A. I. (2001) Effect of liquid chromatography separation of complex matrices on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry signal suppression, J. Chromato. A. 907, 337-342 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01052-9
  7. Hall, G. L., Engebretson, J., Hengel, M. J. and Shibamoto, T. (2004) Analysis of methoxyfenozide residues in fruits, vegetables, and mint by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry(LCMS/MS), J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 672-676 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030591n
  8. Kim, S. 5., Lee, S. M., Koo, M. Y., Park, D. S. and Hur, J. H. (2003) Residual analysis and safety uses of methoxyfenozide and etofenprox in pastures, J. Agri. Sci. 14, 59-66
  9. Wu, S., Stein, R., Desai, T. B., Hofmann, C. K. and Burnett, T. F. (1998) Rohm and Haas Technical Report No. 34-98-71; Residue analytical method for parent RH-2485 in soil, Philadelphia, USA, p. 1-17
  10. Research group for pesticide residue analysis method (1995) Recent pesticide analysis method, Chuohoki publishers, Tokyo, Japan, p. 68-70
  11. Vink, M and van der Poll, J. M (1996) Gas chromatographic determination of acid herbicides in surface water samples with electron-capture detection and mass spectrometric confirmation, J. Chromato. A. 733, 361-366 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00997-3
  12. Balinova, A. (1996) Ion-pairing mechanism in the solid-phase extraction and reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatographic determination of acidic herbicides in water, J. Chromato. A. 728, 319-324 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)01139-0
  13. Fontanals, N., Calia, M, Marce, R. M. and Borrull, F. (2004) Solid-phase extraction of polar compounds with a hydrophilic copolymeric sorbent, J. Chromato. A. 1030, 63-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.076
  14. Lee, P. W, Aizawa, H, Barefoot, A C. and Murphy, J. J. (2003) Handbook of residue analytical methods for agrochemicals, Wiley, Delaware, USA, p.773
  15. Aguilar, c., Ferrer,I., Borrull, F., Marce, R. M. and Barcelo, D. (1999) Monitering of pesticides in river water based on samples previously stored in polymeric cartridges followed by on-line solidphase extraction-liquid chromatography-diode array detection and confirmation by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Analytica Chimica Acta. 386, 237-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00033-1
  16. Hogendoorn, E. A, Westhuis, K, Dijkman, E., Heusinkveld, H. A. G., den Boer, A c, Evers, E. A.I.M. and Baumann, R. A (1999) Semi-permeable surface analytical reversed-phase column for the improved trace analysis of acidic pesticides in water with coupled-column reversed-phase liquid chromatography with UV detection determination of bromoxynil and bentazone in surface water, J. Chromato. A. 858, 45-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00799-2
  17. Choi, J. C, Lee, Y. J., Kim, S. H, Choi, S. Y., Choi, H J., Jeong, S. W, Park, H J. and Kim W S. (2005) Multiresidue analytical method of pesticides in rice by HPLC, J. Environ. Sci. 14 (4), 445-449 https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2005.14.4.445
  18. Dollan, J. W. (2002) Mobile-phase buffers, Part II-buffers selection and capacity, LCGC NORTH AMERICA. 20 (12), 1114-1118
  19. Dollan, J. W. (2003) Mobile-phase buffers, Part III-preparation of buffers, LCGC NORTH AMERICA. 21(1), 28-32
  20. Tekel, J., Hudecova, T. and Pecnikova, K. (2001) Isolation and purification techniques for pesticide residue analyses in samples of plant or animal origin, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 213, 350-258
  21. Neue, U. D. (2002) HPLC troubleshooting guide. Waters. USA p. 20
  22. Horwitz, W. (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC international 17th edition. AOAC international, Gaithersburg, USA, p. 43-44
  23. Choi, D. M, Jeong, J. Y, Chang, M. I., Im, M. H, Park, K S. and Hong M. K (2005) Determination of tetracycline antibiotics in food, Anal. Sci & Tech. 18(3) : 250-256
  24. Pest management regulatory agency (2004) Regulatory note; REG2004-08, Canada, pp. 1-8
  25. Rural development administration & Korea crop protection association (2003) Text book for pesticide registration experiment, Korea, pp. 173-176