Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

A CASE REPORT ABOUT CORRECTION OF IMPLANT POSITION AT HORIZONTAL PLANE AFTER CORTICOTOMY

피질골 절단술을 이용한 수평면에서의 임플란트의 위치 교정에 대한 치험례

  • Choi, Bin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Oh, Hae-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kil, Yong-Gab (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Jwa-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
  • 최빈 (춘천성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 오해수 (춘천성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김진철 (춘천성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 길용갑 (춘천성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김경수 (춘천성심병원 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 김좌영 (한림대 성심병원 구강악안면외과)
  • Published : 2007.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Preface: Dental implant is important method that may solve the mastication, occlusion, esthetic, temporomandibular joint, and psychologic problem in oral and maxillofacial surgery. It is ideal that all of the implant are well positioned by adequate technique. By the way it‘s not always possible because of some anatomic, physiologic factor. In this case, If the implant can be moved to adequate position, it may be possible more esthetically and implanted patients more satisfied, but the majority of Implantists and orthodontists have thought that it is not possible. However, Implant, in fact, can be moved. and thus we can overcome the limit of implantation more. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of implant movement after corticotomy. Case report: Patient missed the upper right first molar. and implantation was done after completion of socket healing. We wait six months for osseointegration. Then, corticotomy was done under local anesthesia and close coil was used for orthodontic force. After traction during 3 weeks, we find the change of implant position at horizontal plane. we can not see the degenerative change on adjacent structure and tracted implant. there is a clinical mobility on upper right second premolar that used for anchorage but it subside spontaneously at the timing of prosthetic restoration without additional treatment. Discussion: As we could have some knowledge with this experiment, we report the case of implant movement after corticotomy and suggest a method about more esthetic implant treatment with a review of literature.

Keywords

References

  1. Laster Z, Rachmiel A, Jensen OT : Alveolar Width Distraction Osteogenesis for Early Implant Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 1724, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.001
  2. Neyt LF, De Clercq C, Abeloos JV et al : Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with a combination of sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 1397, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90636-4
  3. Sclar AG : Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 90, 2004
  4. Reitan K : Biomechanical principles and reactions. In Graber TM, Swain BF, editors : Orthodontics, current principles and techniques, St Louis, Mosby, 1985, p.11
  5. Rygh P, Moxham BJ, Berkovitz BKB : The effects of external forces on the periodontal ligament-the response to horizontal loads. In Berkovitz BKB, Moxham BJ, Newman HN, editors : The periodontal ligamen in health and disease. Oxford, Pergamon Press 1982, p.269
  6. Block MS, Akin R, Chang A et al : Skeletal and dental movements after anterior maxillary advancement using implant-supported distraction osteogenesis in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 1433, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90645-5
  7. Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH : Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 : 391, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.014
  8. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW : Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 : 18, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
  9. Kato S, Kato M : Intrusion of molars with implants as anchorage: a report of two cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 8 : 100, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00005.x
  10. Chen F, Terada K, Hanada K et al : Anchorage effect of osseointegrated vs nonosseointegrated palatal implants. Angle Orthod 76 : 660, 2006
  11. Gedrange T, Boening K, Harzer W : Orthodontic implants as anchorage appliances for unilateral mesialization: a case report. Quintessence Int 37 : 485, 2006
  12. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J : Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implant subjected to static load. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 : 1, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001001.x
  13. Wehrbein H, Diedrich P : Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load-an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 4 : 76, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040203.x
  14. Zechner W, Bernhart T, Zauza K et al : Multidimensional osteodistraction for correction of implant malposition in edentulous segments. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 531, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120515.x
  15. Hu J, Li J, Wang D et al : Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 : 185, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2001.0193
  16. Misch CE : Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Human Mandible : Implication for Dental Implant Treatment Planning and Surgical Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 : 700, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90437-8
  17. Peterson LJ, Indresano AT, Marciani RD et al : Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1st ed Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company, 1992, p.919
  18. Garcia-Garcia A, Somoza-Martin M : Bone distraction versus dynamic guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 724, 2005
  19. Peterson LJ, Indresano AT, Marciani RD et al : Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1st ed Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company, 1992, p.9