A Study on Traits and Relation Type of Old and New with Design strategy of Conversion Design

신.구요소의 관계유형 분석에 의한 컨버전디자인의 전략과 그 특성

  • 노정은 (건국대학교 건축전문대학원 실내건축설계학과) ;
  • 박찬일 (건국대학교 건축전문대학원 실내건축설계학과)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

Regeneration of old buildings is one of the most imperative responses to the 21th century issue of sustainable urban architectural environment. In particular, creative circulation of generation which conversion means highlights the conversion as a new design method. In this study, by examining buildings built over the last decade, the mutual relationship between old elements of existing buildings and new elements of newly required functions was analyzed and types of relationships such as 'alien insertion', 'mediate intervention', 'endogenous expansional enveloping', 'contrastive confliction' and 'over-layering' were defined. In addition, design strategies including the paradoxical curio, fore-grounding and unification were derived from each relationship. Finally, according to the relation type and design strategy, this study suggests several features of conversion design; (1) maximization of symbolism using unfamiliarities - emphasizing futuristic or contextual symbol with intentional contrasts by preserving the work or using contemporary addition; (2) time confusion using neutral space - meeting the need by harmonizing and cooperating existing elements and new elements; (3) mutual emphasizing by individualization - revealing differences between old and new for an aesthetical tension; (4) synchronism by constructional combination - making the one unity of different layers; (5) expansion by enveloping - experience of visual reverse and creation of extra space by roofing above building groups. The reconversion should be continuously researched in the future since conversion is a sustainable design method for the future of architecture.

Keywords

References

  1. Christian Schittich, Building in Existing Fabric, Birkhauser for Architecture, 2003
  2. Kenneth Powell, Architecture Reborn, Calmann & king Ltd. 1999
  3. James Douglas, Building Adaptation, Butterworth Heinmann, 2003
  4. Dorothy A. Henehan, R. Dodge Woodson and Stephen Culbert, Building Change-of-Use, Mc Graw Hill, 2004
  5. Vinny Lee, Recycled Spaces, Soma, 2000
  6. Pierre Thiebaut, Old Buildings Looking for New Use, 2007
  7. Donald Friedman and nathaniel Oppenheimer, The Design of Renovations, 1997
  8. Nora Richter Greer, Architecture Transformed, Rockport Publishers, LTD. 1998
  9. Sherban Cantacuzino, Rearchitecture, Abbeville Press, 1989
  10. 길성호, 수용미학과 현대건축, 시공사, 2003
  11. 이정국.진경돈, 건축의 의미와 장소성, 2000
  12. M. 칼리니스쿠, 모더니티의 다섯얼굴, 시각과 언어, 1998
  13. David R. Dibner & Amy Dibner-Dunlap, 하재명 역, 건축 증개축 디자인, 태림문화사, 1995
  14. 베르나르드 루펜 외 4인, 건축디자인과 분석, 도서출판 국제, 2000
  15. 김인.박수진 편, 도시해석, 주식회사 푸른길, 2006
  16. 국토연구원, 현대 공간이론의 사상가들. 한울 아카데미, 2005
  17. 김병윤.진경돈 편, 현대건축과 생물학의 대화, 시공사, 2000
  18. 김병윤.진경돈 편, 현대건축과 기호학과의 대화, 시공사, 2003
  19. 천의령, 1980년대 중기 이후 현대건축의 관계성의 변화에 대한 연구, 서울대 박사 논문, 1998
  20. 이상흠, 역사적 건축물의 리노베이션에 나타나는 새로운 속성들에 관 한 연구, 서울대 석사논문, 2006
  21. 전한나, 현대공간 재생의 개념확장과 표현요소로써 디자인 의미연구, 서울대 석사논문, 2007
  22. 최무혁, 건축물의 용도변경을 고려한 재활용 디자인에 관한 연구, 한국 과학재단, 1994
  23. 이재인, 건축물 분류에 관한 연구, 홍대석론, 2001
  24. 김태우, 맥락적 측면에서 역사적 건축물에 현대건축 방법을 도입하기 위한 연구, 연세대 석사논문, 1999