Journal of Environmental Science International (한국환경과학회지)

The Korean Environmental Sciences Society (한국환경과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Contents and Leaf Characteristics of Illicium anisatum under Different Shading Treatments

비음처리에 따른 붓순나무의 광합성, 엽록소 함량 및 엽 특성

  • 손석규 (국립산림과학원 난대산림연구소) ;
  • 한진규 (국립산림과학원 유전자원부) ;
  • 김찬수 (국립산림과학원 난대산림연구소) ;
  • 황석인 (국립산림과학원 난대산림연구소) ;
  • 정진현 (국립산림과학원 난대산림연구소) ;
  • 이성기 (국립산림과학원 난대산림연구소)
  • Published : 2007.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Illicium anisatum was bred under four different light intensity. Those condition were full sunlight(PPFD $1600{\mu} mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$), 30% treatment(PPFD $400{\mu} mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$), 50% treatment(PPFD $250{\mu} mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$) and 70% treatment(PPFD $100{\mu} mol\;m^{-2}s^{-1}$), respectively. Chlorophyll a and b were increased according to decrease of light intensity. Thirty percent and 50% treatment had not significant different in chlorophyll a and b. Thirty percent treatment was shown the best photosynthetic activity through invested photosynthetic rate, intercellular $CO_2$ concentration and water use efficiency. Photosynthetic activity trend of 50% treatment was similar to 30% treatment. Seventy percent treatment was shown the best photosynthetic activity at low light intensity but that was decreased to lower value than 30% and 50% treatment under high intensity. Control, bred full sunlight, was shown the worst photosynthetic activity at measured all light intensity. That result could imply that was caused by photo-inhibition because of long term exposed of shade tolerant plant at high light intensity. Leaf characteristics had not significant different in leaf length, width and area but leaf dry weight had similar trend to photosynthetic activity.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim P. G., Lee E. J, 2001, Ecophysiolosy of photosynthesis 2 : Adaptation of photosynthetic apparatus to changing environment, Kor. Jr. of Agric. and For. Meteor. 3(3), 171-176
  2. Terashima I., Hikosaka K., 1995,. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis, Plant, Cell and Env., 18, 1111-1128 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00623.x
  3. Makino A., Sato T., Nakano H., Mae T., 1997, Leaf photosynthesis, plant growth and nitrogen allocation in rice under different irradiances, Planta, 203, 390-398 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050205
  4. Rosenqvist E., Wingsle G., Ogren E., 1991, Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact willow leaves in response to moderate changes in light and temperature. Physiologia Plantarum., 83, 390-396 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb00110.x
  5. Valladares F., Pearcy R. W., 1997, Interactions between water stress, sun-shade acclimation, heat tolerance and photoinhibition in the sclerophyll Heteromeles arbutijolia: Plant, Cell and Env., 20, 24-36
  6. Jo M. H., 1989, Coloured woody plants of Korea, Academybook, 152-300
  7. Je S. M., Son S. G., Woo S. Y., Byun K. O., Kim C. S., 2006, Photosynthesis and chlorophyll contents of Chloranthus glaber under different shading treatments, Kor. Jr. of Agric, and For. Meteor., 8(2), 54-60
  8. Barnes J. D., Balaguer L., Manrique E., Elvira S., Davison A W., 1992, A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophyll a and b in lichen and higher plants, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 32(2), 88-100
  9. Ashraf M., Arfan M., Shahbaz M., Ahmad M., Iamil A., 2002, Gas exchange characteristics and water relations in some elite skra cultivates under water deficit, Photosynthetica, 40(4), 615-620 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024368522742
  10. Valladares F., Wright S. J., Lasso E., Kitajirna K., Pearcy R. W., 2000, Plastic phenotypic response to light of 16 congeneric shrubs from a Panamanian rainforest, Ecol., 81, 1925-1936 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1925:PPRTLO]2.0.CO;2
  11. Thomas T., Lei R. T., Kitao M., Koike T., 1996, Functional relationship between chlorophyll content and leaf reflectance, and lightcapturing efficiency of Japanese forest species, Physiologia Plantarum., 96, 411-418 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00452.x
  12. Verhoeven A. S., Swanberg A, Thao M., Whiteman J., 2005, Seasonal changes in leaf antioxidant systems and xanthophylls cycle characteristics in Taxus x media growing in sun and shade environments, Physiologia Plantarum., 123, 482-434
  13. Hansen U., Fiedler B., Rank B., 2002, Variation of pigment composition and antioxidative systems along the canopy light gradient in a mixed beech/oak forest: a comparative study on deciduous tree species differing in shade tolerance, Tree, 16, 354-364 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-002-0163-9
  14. Valladares F., Chico J. M, Aranda I., Balaguer L., Dizengremel P., Manrique E., Dreyer E., 2002, The greater seedling high-light tolerance of Quercus robur over Fagus sylvatica is linkes to a greater physiological plasticity, Tree 16, 395-403
  15. Evans J. R., 1994, Developmental constrains on photosynthesis: effects of light and nutrition, In : Baker N. R. ed. Photosynthesis and the environment, Kluwer Acadimic Press, Dordrecht, pp. 281 -304
  16. Hakala M., Tuominen I., Keranen M., Tyystja rvi T., Tyystjarvi E., 2005, Evidence for the role of the oxygenevolving manganese complex in photoinhibition of photosystem, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1706, 68-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.09.001
  17. Lu Q., Wen X., Lu C., Zhang Q., Kuang T., 2003, Photoinhibition and photoprotection in senescent leaves of field-grown wheat plants, Plant Physl. and Bioch., 41, 749-754 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00098-6
  18. Marini R. P., Barden J. A., 1982, Light penetration on overcast and clear days, and specific leaf weight in apple trees as affected by summer of dormant pruning, Soc. Hort. Sci. Am. J., 107, 39-43
  19. Salisbury F. B., Ross C. W., 1992, Plant physiology, 4th ed., Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, USA, p. 257